Hello!
I found nothing about subj, so decided to open a separate thread. According to manufacturer of 9.7" Onda V989 (Allwinner A80T, 2048x1536 resolution, RAM 2GB) it gets 48,102 on AnTuTu. I understand AnTuTu is not GFXBench T-Rex HD or Manhattan, but nevertheless would like to understand - how can it be?
According to manufacturer Allwinner A80 (I don't know the difference between A80 and A80T) has 4 x Cortex-A7 + 4 x Cortex-A15 CPU (big.LITTLE, but all the eight cores of A80 can work at the same time) and PowerVR G6230 GPU.
In Galaxy S4 (Exynos 5 Octa) we have the same 4 x Cortex-A7 + 4 x Cortex-A15 CPU (big.LITTLE) and in iPhone 5S Apple A7 we have PowerVR G6430 which is more powerful than PowerVR G6230.
Exynos 5 Octa cache: Cortex-A15 has 32KB + 32KB (L1) and 1MB (L2); Cortex-A7 has 32KB + 32KB (L1 cache) and 512KB (L2 cache).
Apple A7 cache: 64KB + 64KB (L1), 1MB (L2), 4MB (L3).
Allwinner A80T cache: 2MB + 512KB (L2). L1 - ?
Cortex-A7 estimated core performance is 1.9 DMIPS/Mhz, while Cortex A15 has 3.5 DMIPS/Mhz.
Galaxy S4 scores 28,018, iPhone 5S scores about 30,000.
What do you think - what is the main reason for Onda V989 getting 48,102 - simultaneous work of Allwinner A80T cores, it's cache or what else?
There is also very impressive performance of 9.7" Pad P1 on AnTuTu - 40,046 (Rockchip RK3288, 2048х1536 resolution, RAM 2GB). Rockchip RK3288 has 4 х Cortex-A17 CPU and Mali-T764 GPU. As I can't compare Mali-T764 with other GPUs, it's performance doesn't seem strange to me. But still I would like to know your opinion about Rockchip RK3288.
I found nothing about subj, so decided to open a separate thread. According to manufacturer of 9.7" Onda V989 (Allwinner A80T, 2048x1536 resolution, RAM 2GB) it gets 48,102 on AnTuTu. I understand AnTuTu is not GFXBench T-Rex HD or Manhattan, but nevertheless would like to understand - how can it be?
According to manufacturer Allwinner A80 (I don't know the difference between A80 and A80T) has 4 x Cortex-A7 + 4 x Cortex-A15 CPU (big.LITTLE, but all the eight cores of A80 can work at the same time) and PowerVR G6230 GPU.
In Galaxy S4 (Exynos 5 Octa) we have the same 4 x Cortex-A7 + 4 x Cortex-A15 CPU (big.LITTLE) and in iPhone 5S Apple A7 we have PowerVR G6430 which is more powerful than PowerVR G6230.
Exynos 5 Octa cache: Cortex-A15 has 32KB + 32KB (L1) and 1MB (L2); Cortex-A7 has 32KB + 32KB (L1 cache) and 512KB (L2 cache).
Apple A7 cache: 64KB + 64KB (L1), 1MB (L2), 4MB (L3).
Allwinner A80T cache: 2MB + 512KB (L2). L1 - ?
Cortex-A7 estimated core performance is 1.9 DMIPS/Mhz, while Cortex A15 has 3.5 DMIPS/Mhz.
Galaxy S4 scores 28,018, iPhone 5S scores about 30,000.
What do you think - what is the main reason for Onda V989 getting 48,102 - simultaneous work of Allwinner A80T cores, it's cache or what else?
There is also very impressive performance of 9.7" Pad P1 on AnTuTu - 40,046 (Rockchip RK3288, 2048х1536 resolution, RAM 2GB). Rockchip RK3288 has 4 х Cortex-A17 CPU and Mali-T764 GPU. As I can't compare Mali-T764 with other GPUs, it's performance doesn't seem strange to me. But still I would like to know your opinion about Rockchip RK3288.