It's refreshing to see actual facts being posted but no matter how many times I provided evidence to this, it's been ignored for more than 10 years.
Max OC runs at 73C
The minute dust starts building up in the reference card, you'll reach 84-85C in no time and what will happen are reduced boost bins or higher noise levels
Another point that keeps getting ignored on these forums is how little performance separates the 1080 FE against an after-market 1070 -- just
12% at 1440p.
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/952-30/recapitulatif-performances.html
We cannot use the argument that 1080 FE can be overclocked since then noise levels skyrocket compared to an after-market MSI Gaming, Palit, Gigabyte G1 level card, negating any benefits of a blower exhausting the heat out of the case. Since an after-market 1080 will still run cooler and quieter, the 1080 FE has no performance advantages whatsoever.
Gigabyte G1 costs $429 and the $699 1080 FE would be only
~12% faster in real life and people are recommending the OP to keep the FE? No objectivity left on the forums it seems :thumbsdown: Like I get it if you are OK wasting nearly $300, go right ahead but why encourage others to do the same?
We aren't even discussing $699 GTX1080 cards that boost to almost 2Ghz right out of the factory, have double ball bearing fans and come with a
4 year warranty. If someone is spending $700 USD, wouldn't they want the best or close to the best 1080 -- that means:
- as quiet as possible at idle and load
- as fast as possible out of the box
- as cherry-picked chip as possible
In all of those metrics there are plenty of $700 1080 cards that wipe the floor with the 1080 FE.
The biggest issue is finding an AIB 1080, not whether or not it's worth replacing the 1080 FE for an AIB one.
Getting an AIB 1080 such as the Gigabyte XTreme also means no need to waste another $100-150 on water-cooling. Why waste more money water-cooling a 1080 card when the AIB will run cool enough and overclock just as good? Just to say you have water cooling?