AMD posted another monster quarter with strong Q2 guidance. More to follow.
A: DC market - people want more optimized for workloads. We see that in Milan and Milan-X. It's natural for these to sit side by side. With Genoa, we see adoption - lots of excitement and demand. Genoa will sit beside Milan for a time, it's not immediate.
A: Bergamo will be more specific to certain large hyperscalers, for better perf/$ and perf/W solution. AMD can invest more in these customized and optimized solutions.
A: Not sure we see a plateau. 2H expects server to grow, good visibility there, console also growth seasonality. Typical PC is growth in 2H, but we're modelling lower. Xilinx also trends upwards as supply comes online.
I wonder what the total comes to if TSMC's revenue from AMD is added in.
CPU line used mountain names. APUs used painter's names."Granite Ridge", "Strix Point"
Why is AMD abandoning the painters names?!
I wonder what the total comes to if TSMC's revenue from AMD is added in.
That would be terrible for AMD, nobody wants an aging arch, not even for budget systems. They could keep selling their current lineup for entry prices but I doubt that would be financially viable since they would be competing with the second hand market.What I mean, is after more CPU's convert to 5nm and below, 7nm will get cheaper, and the lower end chips can be made to use that resource, and it will get cheaper in time.
They would need 100% of tsmc output to get 50/50 with intel current output, not just of the cutting edge nodes, but total output of tsmc.Yes, but by then maybe marketshare will be 50/50 with Intel (2-3 years ?? or more) and the heat will be on. Even if they have to go elsewhere. They will need cheap CPUs then. Now they are just rolling in dough.
AMD made 786 millions this quarter and that includes all GPU sales and all console sales...it's not CPUs alone.Now they are just rolling in dough.
Edit: I see it has been announced in the call.
Yeah, even server Radeon Instinct won't be included. Will be really interesting to see what kind of numbers that grouping results in. Steam Deck was mentioned in the call as part of semi custom along Sony and Microsoft, so that likely included in gaming as well.So now the consoles will be linked to "Gaming", which will obscure desktop Radeon sales but not much else.
Do you troll every reply I make ? Or are you just a stupid troll ?That would be terrible for AMD, nobody wants an aging arch, not even for budget systems. They could keep selling their current lineup for entry prices but I doubt that would be financially viable since they would be competing with the second hand market.
They would need 100% of tsmc output to get 50/50 with intel current output, not just of the cutting edge nodes, but total output of tsmc.
I'm sure intel IDM 2 is waiting for them open handed if they want to expand.
AMD made 786 millions this quarter and that includes all GPU sales and all console sales...it's not CPUs alone.
Cost of sales has increases the same amount as revenue has and on top of that r&d and marketing has increased.
Well, lets just say that for the next year or so, AMD will do nothing but gain marketshare
What an ignorant take... Do you live in a skyscraper so high, you don't see the rest of the world, only your 2 blocks of perfect life or what?(....) nobody wants an aging arch, not even for budget systems. They could keep selling their current lineup for entry prices but I doubt that would be financially viable since they would be competing with the second hand market.
That will change in time. Right now, concentrating on the high end, mostly server, allows them to make a LOT of money and gain marketshare and mindshare. The lower end will come as MFG costs drop, and they will when things stabilize.
Ok, let me rephrase that, nobody is going to pay new technology prices for older technology.What an ignorant take... Do you live in a skyscraper so high, you don't see the rest of the world, only your 2 blocks of perfect life or what?
They would need 100% of tsmc output to get 50/50 with intel current output, not just of the cutting edge nodes, but total output of tsmc.That would be terrible for AMD, nobody wants an aging arch, not even for budget systems. They could keep selling their current lineup for entry prices but I doubt that would be financially viable since they would be competing with the second hand market.
They would need 100% of tsmc output to get 50/50 with intel current output, not just of the cutting edge nodes, but total output of tsmc.
I'm sure intel IDM 2 is waiting for them open handed if they want to expand.
AMD made 786 millions this quarter and that includes all GPU sales and all console sales...it's not CPUs alone.
Cost of sales has increases the same amount as revenue has and on top of that r&d and marketing has increased.