- Aug 14, 2000
- 22,709
- 3,000
- 126
I think the product is below average/subpar but not terrible. The $269 price-point does help a little, even with the 8GB VRAM.
Last edited:
AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT
AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT / Die Taktraten unter Lastwww.computerbase.de
7600 loves Callisto and COD MW 2... 20% faster. But most are barely faster than the 6650 XT. F1 22 it was even slower by a tad.
Me either! If anything I'm really glad I didn't wait any longer. This generation of cards is CRAP!!!For some reason I don't regret buying a 6800XT in january.
Can we finally stop pretending that RDNA3 architecture is not a dud? What are we seeing here that can't be replicated with an optimized 6650xt on 6nm?
Can we finally stop pretending that RDNA3 architecture is not a dud? What are we seeing here that can't be replicated with an optimized 6650xt on 6nm?
Can we finally stop pretending that RDNA3 architecture is not a dud? What are we seeing here that can't be replicated with an optimized 6650xt on 6nm?
Anyone can link to the RX 6700 10gb review? Can't find any
It is much better than 6650XT that's for sure... But also given how in this benchmark it's still decently slower than the 6700xt in similar proportion to the raster difference I am more inclined to believe something weird happened with the 6650XT there more than that there are dramatic improvements with the 7600.I can only thing of RT performance, especially in heavy RT workloads like CP77, otherwise this is a meh, simple no perf increse directly from mArchitecture
AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT
AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT / Die Taktraten unter Lastwww-computerbase-de.translate.goog
N33 is on 6nm too. Never had high hopes for it. It pretty much is a N23 refresh even in conception. But as you say if RDNA3 wasn't a dud maybe they could have had 10% better performance instead of near equality.Can we finally stop pretending that RDNA3 architecture is not a dud? What are we seeing here that can't be replicated with an optimized 6650xt on 6nm?
I don't think it's THAT bad of a product, but it doesn't seem to move the lower-end price/performance needle much if any, due to lack of generational improvement over it's predecessors.Another horrible product.... Not quite as bad as 4060 Ti but pretty bad still.
Maybe because aside from the RDNA3 changes, this almost is exactly that: a port of the Navi23 to 6nm. IF - and it is a very big IF - AMD were interested in a high volume part, then this part could be it. Yes, 8GB in 2023 isn't great but if they were to reduce the MSRP closer to $200 it could sell really well.Can we finally stop pretending that RDNA3 architecture is not a dud? What are we seeing here that can't be replicated with an optimized 6650xt on 6nm?
$200 would be a much better price. As it is, the ARC A750 8GB for $199 might just eat AMD's low-end lunch.Yes, 8GB in 2023 isn't great but if they were to reduce the MSRP closer to $200 it could sell really well.
Maybe because aside from the RDNA3 changes, this almost is exactly that: a port of the Navi23 to 6nm. IF - and it is a very big IF - AMD were interested in a high volume part, then this part could be it. Yes, 8GB in 2023 isn't great but if they were to reduce the MSRP closer to $200 it could sell really well.
I still think that the go chiplet crazy strategy was far too risky. A 6nm monolith Navi32 able to perform closer to 6800 with 12GB or better still 16GB at maybe $350 would have sold very well IMO.