AMD Athlon Thunderbird 1 GHz

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

bononos

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2011
3,911
172
106
I was building computers at the time and I'll have to say you're full of it. Were you alive then?

To be fair, the Thunderbirds also ran as hot as they were fast. The palomino xp's took the temps down quite a bit. It was the golden age of AMD.
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,059
413
126
well, I would build another retro gaming PC or something (should be an OK combination with my voodoo 4), I also think the 1GHz k7 can handle basic stuff, like office 2003, a basic file server (not a great idea because of power usage), and maybe even some basic video playback, although I think some programs may require SSE.

or you can verify if this is true:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoXRHexGIok

:biggrin:


180nm is so small, I was overclocking my Pentium MMX (166@250) a few days back, 350nm!
 
Last edited:

WhoBeDaPlaya

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2000
7,413
401
126
Please tell me you were being facetious. Thunderbirds were great processors.
Man, I still remember my undergrad days when I was sponsored by AMD, EPoX and a bunch of HSF vendors (Zalman, etc.) So many chipped/cracked Duron cores, it wasn't funny

On that note, I'll never forget the day when AMD sent over an XP 2000+. Damn near had a geekgasm.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
59
91
Man, I still remember my undergrad days when I was sponsored by AMD, EPoX and a bunch of HSF vendors (Zalman, etc.) So many chipped/cracked Duron cores, it wasn't funny

On that note, I'll never forget the day when AMD sent over an XP 2000+. Damn near had a geekgasm.

That must have been cool in its own right to have been sponsored. That would have been a good time to be sponsored too, new hardware every other month was coming out back then.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,554
10,171
126
On that note, I'll never forget the day when AMD sent over an XP 2000+. Damn near had a geekgasm.
I remember going from a PII-300 @ 450 to an Athlon XP 1800+ (don't remember if there was a CPU in-between those two). I finally got to join "The Gigahertz club". It was glorious. I made some complaints about my KT400 MSI mobo, when I found out that it lacked PCI bus-parking, but it was always a stable rig for me.
 

Compman55

Golden Member
Feb 14, 2010
1,241
0
76
I was building computers at the time and I'll have to say you're full of it. Were you alive then?

To be clear, that is when I stayed up with the times. My friend had 1.4 tualatin PIII with what I beleive to be 256k L2, and an intel motherbaord with an 815 chipset. D815EEA2 model I beleive. It would smoke my 1.4 t-bird using a gigabyte GA-7DXR+ w/ AMD 761 chipset.

Later though I worked up to a AthlonXP t-bred B chip 2600+ on a GA-7VRXP board. It would blow the P4 400/533 FSB cpus out of the water, but once the northwood / prescotts hit 800 FSB, they surpassed and I jumped ship to Intel until athlon 64. Then jumped ship again with Core 2 Duo's. Maybe to stay unless AMD can get as awsome at intel at chipset RAID and SATA 3.
 

pyjujiop

Senior member
Mar 17, 2001
243
0
76
The T-birds were the fastest CPUs of their time. I still remember buying a 1.4 GHz, 266 bus Thunderbird for $149 at a time when it was the fastest CPU in the world. It wasn't a great overclocker--best I could do was to increase the bus speed from 133 to 138 and run it at 1.52 GHz--but then again, it didn't need to be. There were no P3s near its clock speed and the Willamette P4's were the Bulldozer of their time.

The Tualatin P3 actually had 512K of level 2 cache running at full speed, and it came along well after the Thunderbirds' run had ended. It competed with the Palomino cores, which had been out several months by the time Intel came up with the 1.4 Tualatin. But, if you were playing anything on the Quake 2 engine, it would have been faster than a 1.4 T-bird. You would have needed a Pally at about 1.6 to beat it.

I never went back to Intel. I kept the T-bird until right before the Palomino was discontinued. Newegg blew out its stock of XP 1600+ (1.4 GHz) Pallys at $42 each. I bought one and pushed it to 1.81 GHz on air, which was screaming fast for its day. A lot of other people bought them and got similar results--basically, a $125 2200+ for a third of the price.

Deals like that don't happen anymore because AMD isn't competing in the performance segment. I sure wish they'd get their act together.
 

bigboxes

Lifer
Apr 6, 2002
40,346
12,226
146
Thunderbird cores were not good at anything except space heating.

Although after reading your later comment I think that you are misinformed. When it was released it was a beast and cheaper than an Intel.

I had a T-Bird 1.2 GHz and a Soltek Motherboard

I thought it was the best thing ever.

My father, at the time, thought I was nuts for going AMD... Kept bring up my previous K6/2 450 Machine as an example. (Dad had a Pentium 233 MMx at the time I had the K6/2 and they were probably about even if I remember right despite the MHz difference)

The T-Bird eat his P III though

I've actually run AMD Processors my whole life in my desktops other than my 2500k system I recently sold. (had a 1090T, then 1045T, than 940 before that) Not a fan of either, I just generally buy AMD I guess. Or I'm stupid.

I went from a 200MMX to a 1.2Ghz Thunderbird w/768mb of ram and that Win98 box was smokin'! Web pages that used to take forever to load now loaded in 1 second. Combined with a Radeon 64 VIVO it could handle all that was thrown at it. Did the pencil trick on it to unlock it and easily bumped it to 1.4Ghz. That was when Abit was king. I miss Abit.

The T-birds were the fastest CPUs of their time. I still remember buying a 1.4 GHz, 266 bus Thunderbird for $149 at a time when it was the fastest CPU in the world. It wasn't a great overclocker--best I could do was to increase the bus speed from 133 to 138 and run it at 1.52 GHz--but then again, it didn't need to be. There were no P3s near its clock speed and the Willamette P4's were the Bulldozer of their time.

The Tualatin P3 actually had 512K of level 2 cache running at full speed, and it came along well after the Thunderbirds' run had ended. It competed with the Palomino cores, which had been out several months by the time Intel came up with the 1.4 Tualatin. But, if you were playing anything on the Quake 2 engine, it would have been faster than a 1.4 T-bird. You would have needed a Pally at about 1.6 to beat it.

I never went back to Intel. I kept the T-bird until right before the Palomino was discontinued. Newegg blew out its stock of XP 1600+ (1.4 GHz) Pallys at $42 each. I bought one and pushed it to 1.81 GHz on air, which was screaming fast for its day. A lot of other people bought them and got similar results--basically, a $125 2200+ for a third of the price.

Deals like that don't happen anymore because AMD isn't competing in the performance segment. I sure wish they'd get their act together.

I upgraded from the 1.2Ghz T-Bird listed above due to the same Newegg deal on the Palomino around the same price point you listed. If I remember correctly everyone was getting the same stepping that easily o/c'd to 1.8Ghz on air with the AG0IA stepping.
 

Rvenger

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
Apr 6, 2004
6,283
5
81
To be clear, that is when I stayed up with the times. My friend had 1.4 tualatin PIII with what I beleive to be 256k L2, and an intel motherbaord with an 815 chipset. D815EEA2 model I beleive. It would smoke my 1.4 t-bird using a gigabyte GA-7DXR+ w/ AMD 761 chipset.

Later though I worked up to a AthlonXP t-bred B chip 2600+ on a GA-7VRXP board. It would blow the P4 400/533 FSB cpus out of the water, but once the northwood / prescotts hit 800 FSB, they surpassed and I jumped ship to Intel until athlon 64. Then jumped ship again with Core 2 Duo's. Maybe to stay unless AMD can get as awsome at intel at chipset RAID and SATA 3.



Anything AMD blew Pentium 4 out of the water in price/performance. I don't even care if it was the "Extreme Editions". Once you overclocked a Barton it was a beast and it even had much better IPC.
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,059
413
126
Anything AMD blew Pentium 4 out of the water in price/performance. I don't even care if it was the "Extreme Editions". Once you overclocked a Barton it was a beast and it even had much better IPC.

I'm not so sure, Intel also had some good CPUs for OC like the northwood 1.6GHz, or later the P4C 2.4GHz and a few others.

but overall yes, AMD had some amazignly good CPUs for overclocking...
as for the overall performance, Intel could easily sell much higher clocked CPUs, so IPC was not to important, looking back I still think k7/k8 beat Intel, but that's not entirely true.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
59
91
Anything AMD blew Pentium 4 out of the water in price/performance.

I wished that were the case when I bought my P4C 2.4GHz (northwood) I badly wanted an X2, but even the very cheapest X2's at the time were out of my price league. So I had to buy my northwood and OC it to 3.2GHz (which was an easy OC) and just live with being jealous of all my AT friends who had X2's in their rigs.
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,059
413
126
I wished that were the case when I bought my P4C 2.4GHz (northwood) I badly wanted an X2, but even the very cheapest X2's at the time were out of my price league. So I had to buy my northwood and OC it to 3.2GHz (which was an easy OC) and just live with being jealous of all my AT friends who had X2's in their rigs.

the Pentium D 820 came at around the same time as the X2 I think and it was a lot more affordable... oh well, back in 2005 I was probably using a single core (s754) k8 at 2 - 2.4GHz
 

Makaveli

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2002
4,804
1,269
136
ahh the good old days I would keep it.

Great chip in its time even if they ran hot.

Overclocking was alot more interesting back then.
 

nenforcer

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2008
1,767
1
76
Great chip I built an 800MHz version for a friend using a VIA KT400 chipset and it was held back by incompatibilities in trying to run Sound Blaster Live PCI sound cards at the time.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,358
8,447
126
ahh the good old days I would keep it.

Great chip in its time even if they ran hot.

Overclocking was alot more interesting back then.

I doubt they were as hot as we all remember. The hsf units back then were really terrible. Tiny little things with tiny fans blowing straight down. Even today's stock Intel cooler is much bigger.
 

bigboxes

Lifer
Apr 6, 2002
40,346
12,226
146
I doubt they were as hot as we all remember. The hsf units back then were really terrible. Tiny little things with tiny fans blowing straight down. Even today's stock Intel cooler is much bigger.

Well, that's all relative. Compared to what had come before them they did run hotter. Not too long before we had fanless heatsinks. I still have a coupole of Thermaltake socket A coolers. Today, we are just used to these monster tower heatsinks. It would be interesting to see their effect on these older CPUs. Has anyone tried pairing a modern cpu cooler with one of these Thunderbird processors?
 

bigboxes

Lifer
Apr 6, 2002
40,346
12,226
146
Well, it seems I have more than a couple socket A coolers. I have FOUR of them! The first one I purchased was the Thermaltake Volcano 2. It wasn't the world's greatest overclocker, but it was very quiet. Thermaltake was a new company back in 1999. Interesting at all the tech companies that are no longer with us, but Thermaltake is still here.

Thermaltake Volcano 2


Thermaltake had first come out with the Golden Orb for the Intel Pentium processor. So, after Anand reviewed the Super Orb I just had to get it to test out on my Thunderbird CPU!

Thermaltake Super Orb


Thermaltake Super Orb Retail Box


When I moved up to the Palomino I wanted to get a better cooling solution. I tried the Thermaltake Volcano 7+. It had a copper base and cooling fins paired with a 70mm fan. Thing is those thin fins created all sorts of unpleasant noise when air was pushed over them. I hated it. Returned to the stock HSF and still got my Pally to 1.8 (25% o/c).

Thermaltake Volcano 7+


I seemed to remember one other Socket A HSF that I had. Then I remembered that I was still using it (albeit rarely) on newer Abit VA-20 mobo with my last Socket A processor, the 2600+ (Barton). It's there just to play around whenever I want an older test bed. (AGP, Socket A, etc.)

Thermaltake Silent Boost
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,358
8,447
126
Well, it seems I have more than a couple socket A coolers. I have FOUR of them! The first one I purchased was the Thermaltake Volcano 2. It wasn't the world's greatest overclocker, but it was very quiet. Thermaltake was a new company back in 1999. Interesting at all the tech companies that are no longer with us, but Thermaltake is still here.

i had one of these things
http://www.frostytech.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=876

you could hear that delta fan in the next room with the doors closed.


i know i had a tbird, a tbred, and a barton. not sure if i had a palomino or not.
 
Last edited:

john3850

Golden Member
Oct 19, 2002
1,436
21
81
Had a epox that oc good till ps connector on the mb melted together.
Broke out the dremel cut away half of plastic connectors and forced a higher watt ps on it.
I still remember using a windshield defroster repair kit to jump out tiny dots on the cpu.
Those defroster repair kits still come in handy for jumping out traces on circuit boards.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |