http://www.sapphiretech.com/productdetial.asp?pid=EAA92399-C759-4F17-ADB7-75A1D2DACD36&lang=engDoes anyone know what type of eMMC support Stoney Ridge has? eMMC 5.0 or eMMC 5.1?
http://www.sapphiretech.com/productdetial.asp?pid=EAA92399-C759-4F17-ADB7-75A1D2DACD36&lang=eng
On board Kingston EMMC64G-E100 64GB eMMC chip //
Kingston A19nm e•MMC™ Flash memory follows the JEDEC e•MMC 5.0 standard and encloses the MLC NAND and e•MMC
controller inside one JEDEC standard package to provide a standard interface to the host CPU.
===
eMMC v5.0 is confirmed if Bristol Ridge-[2core] supports it.
One of my ITX babies is an AMD 860K running at 4Ghz undervolted to hell.
So what I'm wondering about...how much of a difference would I see with a Bristol Ridge CPU running at 4 GHZ?
It's Excavator + DDR4 and new chipset....should I expect more than a 5% difference (avg)? I mean there's some OEM dirt out already...but that stuff was never good for benchmarking ANYTHING (imo)...but maybe it gives a general idea.
I like running my small machines on "low" end AMD CPUs and see how far I can push them in a balanced system. So I'd really love playing with one of them before Zen arrives...but I'm really hard trying to figure out how much of a difference I should expect 4GHZ vs 4GHZ...if it even clocks that high with the 65W envelope...but then again, probably unlocked, anyway.
TL'DR: How much difference would this CPU make to a Kaveri CPU if both are clocked at the same speeds.
As long as you aren't gaming with it, a 4 GHz 845 would be a solid upgrade. What voltage are you using on that 4 GHz 860k?
1.21V @ 4Ghz. Scary how energy efficient this 28nm chip could have actually been....but then again, most boards notoriously overvolt those chips to hell @ like 1.45V @ 3.7-4 Ghz.
AMD AM4 Chipset Specs: B350, A320, XBA300 & A12-9800 APU, X4 950
http://www.gamersnexus.net/news-pc/2593-amd-am4-chipsets-announced-and-new-apu-specs
The above will be joined by an as-yet unnamed 'enthusiast' level chipset.
This is incredibly, its still on 28nm planar.
The new "Enthusiast" chipset will come with ZEN most probably.
It s still relevant for Bristol Ridge if one wants to build a PC with a ton of I/O and at low cost...
3.8 Ghz (4.2 Ghz boost) CPU speed and 1108 Mhz GPU speed @ 65W?
That is pretty darn good for the fact that this is still a 28nm product.
I mean Kaveris' first top dog' on FM2+ was 3.7 Ghz (4Ghz boost) + 720Mhz GPU speed @ 95W.
But at 2400 Mhz the GPU is still going to be bandwidth starved...isn't it? I hope the chips run stable with 3000 Mhz+.
yes it is, i was just pointing out that AMD will launch ZEN with this chipset most probably.
One more slide.
That s likely...
Also in the slide they say up to 17% better ST perf in respect of Kaveri, yet the clocks are about the same..
In one slide they say that they are committed to the AM4 plateform for years, that would be great if they get back to AM3+ longevity wich mean that Zen+ will be compatible, this save costs on both sides, for them and for the consumer.
Obviously those clocks cannot be sustained / had simulatenously at that TDP. Carrizo requires > 45W just for the CPU cores to hold them all constantly at 3.4GHz.
For the GPU you're looking at about the same amount in full load.
Also higher than 2400MHz MEMCLK won't happen unless you raise the BCLK, which is an awful idea on APUs.
Kaveri is not Excavator
I have the impression that you didnt follow AMD these last months, at least not on a technical point of view, why are you stuck on useless extrapolation from Carrizo when it s obvious that it s not the same silicon..?.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10362/amd-7th-generation-apu-bristol-ridge-stoney-ridge-for-notebooks
So much for your "these clocks cant be sustained", looking at this graph you are just spreading fud, be it unwillingly, or at least i hope that it s not willfully..