http://www.bitsandchips.it/hardware...2-fino-al-2016-niente-ddr4-per-le-apu-desktop
Carrizo possibly is for mobile only.
Carrizo possibly is for mobile only.
Lenovo Intel Shark Bay/Skylake,AMD Carrizo/Carrizo-L platform projects of Compal.
I reckon someone was bored http://www.overclock.net/t/1504122/...-features-fm3-and-20nm-afterall#post_22620345
I reckon someone was bored http://www.overclock.net/t/1504122/...-features-fm3-and-20nm-afterall#post_22620345
Apparently, there is two Carrizo platforms. The "Carrizo" platform and the "Carrizo-L" platform.
I've been searching but I only know that these two exist. I have nothing to tell them apart so far.
The mentions of both platforms side by side with Intel platforms places it with;
Carrizo => Haswell/Broadwell?
Carrizo-L => Skylake
http://tw.linkedin.com/pub/盈如-陳/98/673/b8
Compal does notebook platforms not desktop platforms.Perhaps Carrizo = DDR3 on FM2+, Carrizo-L = DDR4 and integrated southbridge?
So you expect AMD to let Kaveri only live for ~6 months on the market and replace it with a minor bump like Carrizo? What's the point and where is the economic logic in that?Everything I have seen is pointing at a double Carrizo launch though. One this year, August to October, for Desktop.
So you expect AMD to let Kaveri only live for ~6 months on the market and replace it with a minor bump like Carrizo? What's the point and where is the economic logic in that?
If Carrizo has a better perf/watt, it should be replaced if the design is done. It's still being manufactured on the same process node (HPM?), so cost the AMD should be about the same (+ new masks).
Has Carrizo taped out?
High Bandiwdth Memory does not need a new platform. It just needs enough area within the package to fit a HBM Stack or a couple HBM stacks.No HBM will be quite sad. It probably requires new platform.
AMD releases new parts for the desktop platform around every 9 months. If Excavator launches beyond that point. Then, Excavator is not by absolute definition a 15h architecture.So you expect AMD to let Kaveri only live for ~6 months on the market and replace it with a minor bump like Carrizo? What's the point and where is the economic logic in that?
High Bandiwdth Memory does not need a new platform. It just needs enough area within the package to fit a HBM Stack or a couple HBM stacks.AMD releases new parts for the desktop platform around every 9 months. If Excavator launches beyond that point. Then, Excavator is not by absolute definition a 15h architecture.
Trinity -> Richland -> Kaveri
Each transition on the desktop side took only up to 9 months.
While for Llano(1st gen SKUs) -> Trinity(1st gen SKUs)
Took 15 months; 2nd gen Llano SKUs to 1st gen Trinity SKUs only took 9 months.
Trinity and Richland were not the same die. Richland had a couple layers changed, it looks the same but it isn't the same.Trinity to richland were the same die (basically) with better manufacturing and binning.
Of course it needs a new socket. Otherwise what pins would supply the power for it?High Bandiwdth Memory does not need a new platform. It just needs enough area within the package to fit a HBM Stack or a couple HBM stacks.AMD releases new parts for the desktop platform around every 9 months.
The same pins that send power through the Integrated Voltage Regulation.Of course it needs a new socket. Otherwise what pins would supply the power for it?
Of course it needs a new socket. Otherwise what pins would supply the power for it?
Trinity and Richland were not the same die. Richland had a couple layers changed, it looks the same but it isn't the same.
Richland;
- Hybrid Boost (17 Temperature Sensors, to evaluate boosts in both CPU and GPU)
- cTDP on certain platforms
- Reduced BAPM latency (Faster P-State switching)
- Etc
TN-A1 = Base Model - 0 / Stepping - 1
RL-A1 = Base Model - 3 / Stepping - 1
The differences between Trinity and Richland are within 10h-1Fh specification. While Kaveri's and Carrizo's are within separate specifications.
Kaveri - Family 15h Models 30h-3Fh Processors.
Carrizo - Family 15h Models 60h-6Fh Processors.
Where Richland is from the same model tree as Trinity. Carrizo is not from the same model tree as Kaveri.
You can stretch Richland to being the same or near the same as Trinity. The same can not be said between Kaveri and Carrizo.
Trinity to richland were the same die (basically) with better manufacturing and binning. Much like the 4790k is to the 4770k. It is absolutely not a "new" platform.
Not really, the only similarity is that the difference is minor. 4790K has exactly the same silicon as 4770k but has an improved package while Richland is a different silicon stepping then Trinity while retaining the same package.
I'm not sure how AMD and intel define it but trinity and richland have the same stepping, different revisions.
Both are stepping 1.
And no program can currently properly report temps for that CPU! Seriously, WTF AMD...Richland;
- Hybrid Boost (17 Temperature Sensors, to evaluate boosts in both CPU and GPU)
And no program can currently properly report temps for that CPU! Seriously, WTF AMD...