http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37637227&postcount=2301
Ultimately the thread is about Carrizo, not about Intel s shenanigans to hide their power numbers and get the things explained by sales forces.
As said ad nauseam provide official numbers, in the waiting mines are the relevant ones.
26% improvement in CB 11.5 and 13.6% in CB R15, the comparisons you re using are not relevant a all, if you want relevant ones check here :
http://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-HP-Pavilion-17-g054ng-Notebook.147334.0.html
Look at the scores of the i3s in respect of Carrizo in both version of the bench, they are behind in the former and ahead in the latter, thing is that you wont see such scam with Povray successive versions..
If the slide below is genuine there will be one but only in 12 months.
Please, stop cluttering this topic with argumentation no one follows and which strays away from more original and useful talks: Carrizo implemented in actual products (which we can buy).
I really have the idea that you're talking about AMD as a horse everyone sees dead (or injured) but you can't accept it, only defending it and trying to drag competitors down, you expect it to become alive and kicking. You're making a joke of yourself.