Well no matter what you think...at least on that picture all the GPU clocks are quite a bit higher. (136 Mhz on the top model is quiiiiite a bump)
The top range also has a higher max CPU clock.
That's why I'm saying that this picture must be faulty as hell...even if they fix up some things...then why ruin the gains again by lowering the Mhz once again? ESPECIALLY if you have a 95W TDP...which is something that especially the Athlons don't even get close.
If this picture is 100% accurate...then AMD just lost the little bit of common sense they had left. xD
Dont know the technical reason of thoses choices, could be that thoses chips, set apart the higher clocked ones, are dedicated to OEMs, i noticed that Asus sell quite a few AMD based home DTs and all use only 65W Richlands or Kaveris, 95W is definitly an enthusiast class TDP range that is well above TDPs of mainstream home or office PCs.