1). People keep forgetting how much better Carrizo is (or could be) compared to mobile Kaveri. Here's some reminders:
http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Kaveri-FX-7600P-Notebook-Processor.117329.0.html
http://www.notebookcheck.org/AMD-A-Series-FX-8800P-Notebook-Processor.147049.0.html
Cosidering the 8800P numbers come from notebookcheck's reviews of Y700 products, those numbers are probably as close to proper as they're going to get for the 8800P. Those are some pretty nice improvements for Carrizo over Mobile Kaveri, with some real whoppers in there, like a ~50% median improvement in 3DMark Vantage or a ~37% median improvement in 3DMark Fire Strike physics.
Going around in circles about whether it caught up with Intel or who is cheating on power consumption is irritating.
2). I would like to know what AMD actively did within the last year to get Carrizo put in so many poorly-configured laptops that won't let it run out of 15W mode at all (or not for long enough like the Y700), have useless dGPUs, no SSDs, too-big or too-small screens, weird RAM configurations, and other stupidity.
Because if it's their fault, all their fault, blah blah blah who's the AMD guy who put these build recommendations in the docs they shipped with reference products?
I will say this much: according to what The Stilt has intimated about his reference unit, there are some limitations on the VRMs, the power brick, and the cooling such Carrizo was definitely not going to go over maybe 70W power consumption; furthermore, if you ran every part of the 8800P at max clocks all the time, it would approach a TDP level of maybe . . . 65W or higher? So there's no way it's gonna run CPU + iGPU at full tilt allll the time.
3). Carrizo is now old hat, so why are we still posting in a preview thread? Bring on Bristol Ridge mobile/Stoney Ridge.