AnandThenMan
Diamond Member
- Nov 11, 2004
- 3,949
- 504
- 126
Same, but I've realized I'm gonna have to compromise and get something else in the mean time. Will probably go with an ultra wide 1440, hopefully with FreeSync.I want 32-37" 4K monitor.
Same, but I've realized I'm gonna have to compromise and get something else in the mean time. Will probably go with an ultra wide 1440, hopefully with FreeSync.I want 32-37" 4K monitor.
The Acer is suffering from ghosting, too.
Which review claims that?
Its DP1.2 vesa standard. The scalar companies is onboard.
Every new monitor i half a year will support it. Some will just disable the functionality and slap a gsynch label on and add 100usd to the price. Its simple but good tech. Thank you for the idea nv. Now we move on.
I have no doubt we'll see as 1440p120+ IPS monitor with Freesync, in fact I think ASUS's first 1440p120+ IPS (MG279Q) is likely to support Freesync
the main issue for me is whether or not it also has some sort of strobing feature to compete with the ULMB side of G-Sync, as that is a feature Freesync does not address.
You do know that ULMB and Gsync are functionally exclusive? You can't use ULMB with Gsync. You have to turn Gsync off.
Maybe in a year or so the market will decide, if not at the very least there will be better displays.
Freesync will win the overall market due to widespread DisplayPort 1.2a adoption, but this choice wont be decided by AMD or Nvidia users but by Intel since Broadwell supports 1.2a. I suspect Nvidia will have to adopt some form of open 1.2a support for its mobile GPUs since I doubt the laptop market will be as willing to pay a G-SYNC premium. Whether G-SYNC survives long term as a premium sync alternative with unique features for Nvidia users remains to be seen.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=27799387&postcount=176
Is it really as simple as turning off something at the monitor to eliminate the ghosting?
For its part, AMD says that ghosting is an issue it is hoping to lessen on FreeSync monitors by helping partners pick the right components (Tcon, scalars, etc.) and to drive a “fast evolution” in this area.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=27799387&postcount=176
Is it really as simple as turning off something at the monitor to eliminate the ghosting?
Thanks.
I'll avoid these then. The review also point out what I suspect, 40hz is too high a min where games will and often drop to 30 or even less. Basically, the lower the better, 30 seems the acceptable mark.
Gonna have to wait for better models to upgrade.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=27799387&postcount=176
Is it really as simple as turning off something at the monitor to eliminate the ghosting?
Imagine 4K with 40 or 48FPS minimums...
AMD says different components are needed.
That's all you can do is imagine them since they don't exist. Let's see what the support when they are released.
40 is probably fine for me, a range up to 75+ would be nice. I try to limit my settings to sit at a constant monitor refresh rate, but supporting the occasional drop is the bonus I would see freesync supporting.
I'm glad it's free since there are quite a few things I want in a monitor and I'm certainly not willing to pay $200 for the same experience, especially for a single feature.
The perspective doesnt look good from the first 4 monitors and 3 manufactors.
And its less than 200$. The closest compare we got for now is the Swift vs the BenQ with a 150$ delta. But the BenQ is nowhere near the Swift quality.
Looking at direct comparisons, the Acer XG270HU and BenQ XL2730Z are WQHD 144Hz panels, which pits them against the $759 ASUS ROG Swift that we recently reviewed, giving FreeSync a $160 to $260 advantage.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9097/the-amd-freesync-review/2For those that want higher refresh rates, Acer and BenQ have TN-based 40-144Hz displays. Both are 27” WQHD displays, so it’s quite probable that they’re using the same panel, perhaps even the same panel that we’ve seen in the ASUS ROG Swift.
Less than $200? How about $160-$260 differences.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9097/the-amd-freesync-review/2
I dont see the Acer in your link.
The BenQ:
http://www.amazon.com/BenQ-XL2730Z-...8&qid=1426849021&sr=1-1&keywords=BenQ+XL2730Z
630-707$
The Swift:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00MSOND8C?tag=vglnkc3350-20
724-759$
Thats 100$ or less. And the swift doesnt have ghosting issues and works from 30FPS. While the BenQ suffers from ghosting and requries 40FPS.