They talked about Piledriver before Bulldozer's release as well.
Yeah they did...:sneaky:Not the same way they did with Steamroller before Vishera.
It's still Piledriver, just like Trintiy is Piledriver. Piledriver is done and awaiting production; meanwhile it's not at all unusual for AMD to spend Hot Chips talking about stuff that's a year+ out.I agree to some degree that Vishera is Piledriver, but it's Piledriver+ with some improvements and added cache
Strange that you felt the need to make a post about this non-topic half an hour after making the same point in that OBR thread.
This is completely illogical.
If AMD's ready to go public with their Steamroller details, why shouldn't they? Just because you have an apparent selfish need for Vishera to launch prior to talking about Steamroller does not mean that everybody else that is curious about Steamroller, like myself, should have to wait to hear about it.
Piledriver's already out in the form of Trinity APUs. But no, a very small percentage of the desktop market is somehow more important than AMD's mainstream products. You seem to be suffering from entitlement issues.
It's still Piledriver, just like Trintiy is Piledriver. Piledriver is done and awaiting production; meanwhile it's not at all unusual for AMD to spend Hot Chips talking about stuff that's a year+ out.
Since you apparently didn't read it last time:
= Just To Piss Of Homeles.-JTPOH
Piledriver with cache is still Piledriver. You're expecting AMD to make a big deal out of a product based on the same architecture as an existing product; no one does that. For the CPU guys the big announcements are the architectures and the first wave of products based on them, not the individual products that follow.It is not the same. They aren't the exact same design, they won't have the same performance. It boggles the mind how people truly think this. If it was the same, they'd call it Trinity, but they call it Vishera, because it's different enough to require it's own name.
Maybe AMD is excited that steamroller will be as fast as phenom 2 finally.
Piledriver with cache is still Piledriver. You're expecting AMD to make a big deal out of a product based on the same architecture as an existing product; no one does that. For the CPU guys the big announcements are the architectures and the first wave of products based on them, not the individual products that follow.
It's not as strange as you might think. Good investigation work btw.
Baited and hooked, rofl! ()
= Just To Piss Of Homeles.
this thread was doomed from the start