All you needed to do was to check my video's... This has been there for some time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r5pGUKOh1I
That is DX11 against Mantle at 1080P (both on the Fury X). First you tell me I need 200%, then you tell me I need 1080P, it seems no matter what, you have it that I am doing it wrong, so what next? You make out you know me but really you don't. I have A titan X, A fury X and a 7950 but your personal agenda is getting in the way. Not sure why I replied, as this will get picked apart but I do bring evidence to the table whilst you don't actually bring anything other than rude insults.
Thanks for the kind words everyone else and I thought I did quite well seeing as I had to squeeze all this testing in between doing 12 hour shifts and keeping the wife happy
No, respectful to everyone in this forum you interact with, including members you don't share an opinion with.
I asked you, for the purpose of clarification, to cite the video you are referring to separately, so that individuals reading this thread don't have to dig through fifteen pages to try and figure out what you are talking about. You haven't done that.
Have fun amusing yourself somewhere else.
-- stahlhart
So we've all already forgotten that this was replicated on 290's?
Or are we all agenda pushing here?
Because it's getting pretty old.
The folks driving an agenda are clear as day lately. Say something remotely negative about a brand and they jump on you.
Say something positive about a brand and you're their best friend. Now we're back to the 10% cheating theory. Woof.
An ignorant is just a person that doesnt know any better.
If there is some special way of using it in english in terms of slang that makes it rude. Then I am sorry about that.
The danish wordbook doesnt have any offensive meaning to the word.
The point would be to investigate why/how/when some people are getting reduced quality.
If benchmarks are done with a 10% performance boost they are invalidated.
It's just PC components which none of us should care about other than the integrity of the data, without ulterior motives.
great. where's the investigation into the 290's then?
no posts on that in your history.
ton's of stuff about the 980 tho, how we need to "trust the source" and how we need to "investigate the issue".
Maybe your OP (EDIT: and thread title) should be edited as well, as it seems pretty clear that the initial problem was PEBKAC.
What are you referring to with 290's? I'm not opposed to looking into image quality for any card. Actually to the contrary I'm very interested if there is something wrong with the image quality.
As for the title it falls into the overall topic. What's your problem with it or suggestion? I think it's quite neutral like the issue should be.
...By the way, you don't even have to put the NCP in highest quality to fix gta5, you only have to select 16x AF in the control panel instead of "let the application decide". This may be all gregster needs to do to fix his Bf4 issue, i checked bf4 myself and didn't have his issue so I can't try it myself.
Isn't the issue at hand that AMD's "Use application settings" actually let the game in-game settings take precedence over the vendor controlled settings?
From reading the thread it appears Nvidia's default is "Let application decide", which I read as should do the same, i.e. let the in-game settings decide the IQ.
Apparently that's not the case and it needs to manually be set. How does AF affect performance of games nowadays?
No, it's not the case.
Seriously. This is the only forum still spouting this nonsense.
:wub:
Isn't that what Gregster was finding though that he had to set it manually to 16xAF in Nvidia's tool? I may have misread the thread, but that was my impression...
No, it's not the case.
Seriously. This is the only forum still spouting this nonsense.
What are you referring to with 290's? I'm not opposed to looking into image quality for any card. Actually to the contrary I'm very interested if there is something wrong with the image quality.
As for the title it falls into the overall topic. What's your problem with it or suggestion? I think it's quite neutral like the issue should be.
there is no issue hence some member are trying create an false excuse of Fury X fail launch.
Indeed. Case in point:Well, the thread needs to be kept near the top for the most exposure. True or not. Anandtech is one of the most popular forums on the web, so it makes sense for all the focus to be here.
We still don't know why it required manually overriding settings to get the same image quality.
The whole point is to figure out what's going on. It seems like you can get similar image quality, but most importantly is what can cause the issue to occur where image quality is lacking.
It seems like a relatively easy issue to track down by switching between AMD & NV cards and comparing images.
It might make sense for a mod to edit the first post to note that it has been debunked. Most people won't wade through 16 pages to find that information.
We still don't know why it required manually overriding settings to get the same image quality.
The whole point is to figure out what's going on. It seems like you can get similar image quality, but most importantly is what can cause the issue to occur where image quality is lacking.
It seems like a relatively easy issue to track down by switching between AMD & NV cards and comparing images.
EDIT: This is with default settings in AMD CCC.