I can finally make this thread.
Phoenix is indeed RDNA3. My advice to everyone: treat the old APU rumours as being out of date.
Phoenix is indeed RDNA3. My advice to everyone: treat the old APU rumours as being out of date.
You mean that PHX and PHX2 share the same die, or that all PHX SKUs share the same die, while all PHX2 SKUs share the same die as well (but another one than PHX)? Has this ever seriously been in question?Time to bring this up, Sisoftware leak the 7540U spec, which has also full 16M L3 cache and 6 cores:
Details for Component AMD Ryzen 5 7540U w/ Radeon 740M Graphics
ranker.sisoftware.co.uk
It is clear that all Phoenix include 'PHX2' share same die, they are either full 8Core & 16M L3, or cut down/lesser cores&CUs version of it while still has full 16M L3. What else should be different is the clock.
Phoronix2 is also on 4nm instead of 5nm.PHX2 is not the same die, it has half the L2 cache on GPU side for example (not to mention the obvious CPU complex changes).
It's either PHX2 doesn't exist, or mobile 7000 series don't use any PHX2 die.You mean that PHX and PHX2 share the same die, or that all PHX SKUs share the same die, while all PHX2 SKUs share the same die as well (but another one than PHX)? Has this ever seriously been in question?
He probably meant Phoenix 2. But that typo was pretty funny.??.....
Yes I ment Phoenix2..He probably meant Phoenix 2. But that typo was pretty funny.
Care to explain, why?It's either PHX2 doesn't exist, or mobile 7000 series don't use any PHX2 die.
As expected, barely any gains for the iGPU over the 680M.AMD Phoenix Ryzen 7040 APUs Benchmarked, Higher Performance Than Intel At Same Power, Gaming & Efficiency Leadership
The first full review of AMD Ryzen 7040 Phoenix APUs has been revealed and it shows complete efficiency and gaming leadership.wccftech-com.cdn.ampproject.org
I know it's wccf but looks pretty legit. If these numbers are correct, things are looking great for this mobile generation.
12% is barely any gain in your pseudo book..?.As expected, barely any gains for the iGPU over the 680M.
Depends on your outlook. We also get a 5% win sometimes defined as "demolish". Language, what happened to you?12% is barely any gain in your pseudo book..?.
We ll know more soon since NBC said they ll provide an in depth analysis of a 7940.
Clock the 680M at 2.8 GHz. There's your 12%. Zero gains from the architecture change.12% is barely any gain in your pseudo book..?.
We ll know more soon since NBC said they ll provide an in depth analysis of a 7940.
12% is barely any gain in your pseudo book..?.
We ll know more soon since NBC said they ll provide an in depth analysis of a 7940.
Dual issue is not being utilized, so the TFlops are just theoretical for now.12% more performance with more than 100% Flops? (3.4TF vs 8,9TF)
Dual issue is not being utilized, so the TFlops are just theoretical for now.
AMD should have at least taken one game developer onboard to develop the game optimized for RDNA3 to showcase the usage."For now".
Clock the 680M at 2.8 GHz. There's your 12%. Zero gains from the architecture change.
As usual, you make nonsensical, irrelevant arguments.So frequency improvement doesnt count, should the current CPUs be compared to old ones at the latters frequencies..?..
As usual, you make nonsensical, irrelevant arguments.
Clutching at straws.The non sense is to say that there s no gain while there s a 12% gain, frequency is just as relevant as IPC since they use a smaller node and dont increase the thermals, at this rate you should compare a Zen1 to a Zen 4 and point the IPC improvement as only perf improvement.
As usual, you make nonsensical, irrelevant arguments.
As expected, barely any gains for the iGPU over the 680M.