1) No trolling, flaming or personally attacking members. Deftly attacking ideas and backing up arguments with facts is acceptable and encouraged. Attacking other members personally and purposefully causing trouble with no motive other than to upset the crowd is not allowed.
IdontcareWe want to give all our members as much freedom as possible while maintaining an environment that encourages productive discussion. It is our desire to encourage our members to share their knowledge and experiences in order to benefit the rest of the community, while also providing a place for people to come and just hang out.
We also intend to encourage respect and responsibility among members in order to maintain order and civility. Our social forums will have a relaxed atmosphere, but other forums will be expected to remain on-topic and posts should be helpful, relevant and professional.
We ask for respect and common decency towards your fellow forum members.
When are the mods going to stop this b.s.?
When are the mods going to stop this b.s.?
There's no harm in discussing Piledriver. It's interesting to see Keys start a witch hunt rather than contributing something useful.
I will say that I hope AMD can work out the issues in Bulldozer relatively quickly and bring us something decent. I have a feeling that there are a few bugs in the design that they can work out, particularly when it comes to power consumption.
That said, things do not look good for AMD. As others have said, 15% more performance is not enough.
If AMD can reign in the power consumption to be competitive with Intel, they will have an excellent workstation and server processor on their hands, which is their niche anyway.
BTW OP welcome to the AT forums.
Ha! Your drivel made me laugh for once.The one who absolutely feasts on drama and unrest says he doesn't want to see a witch hunt. At least not one that I might start? Yeah ok, I buy that.
I think it might be time for you to be who you really are and not pretend you don't like this type of drama.. AMD is pretty much reaping what they have sown, as a friend of mine has just said to me.
I think it just that the pieces fall into place now and in the near future.
If Pile Driver is 10% faster/better IPC than BD, atleast then AMD will finally beat an i7...
Trailing Bit Manipulation (TBM):
TBM instructions provide instructions implementing individual bit
manipulation operations such as isolating, masking, setting, resetting,
complementing, and operations on trailing zeros and ones.
Ha! Your drivel made me laugh for once.
I will not engage you further lest this shall degenerate into a flame war. :thumbsup::thumbsup:
Extremely good reasoning that was. I registered here because I followed Bulldozer news and discussion here.I was wondering who would be the first to post this reasoning. I really was!
And I'll also sit and truly wonder if you really believe what you just posted. Not publicly of course.
Is it a crime to start a thread on a upcoming product ??????
If bulldozer failed does it mean that Pildriver will also fail....
Is it a crime to be a "new reg"????? If that so ban me and I will never come back on this forum..
16000+ posts does give you license to abuse others..... Every one here was a new registered user once so everyone has right to discuss something which is helpful to the community...
If this thread is not for tech discussion then sorry I am in a wrong place...... If anyone don't like this thread... Ignore it....
Final decision with mods.... If you feel this thread is useless and there is something intresting to discuss delete this thread.......
I can't find much moreCode:Trailing Bit Manipulation (TBM): TBM instructions provide instructions implementing individual bit manipulation operations such as isolating, masking, setting, resetting, complementing, and operations on trailing zeros and ones.
But the Vishera CPUs will most likely have a lower clock that the Zambezi CPUs
As the Trinity APUs have a lower clock than the Llano APUs while scoring similarlyish(That is a feat)
Implying they increased instruction throughput somehow
Like I said , This topic is a bad idea. Hyping an AMD product right now on this forum or any other outsided of zoners isn't wise at this time .
You have a very interesting writing form . I have seen that befor.
Like I said , This topic is a bad idea. Hyping an AMD product right now on this forum or any other outsided of zoners isn't wise at this time .
You have a very interesting writing form . I have seen that befor.
Did AMD really expect GloFlo's 32nm process to allow a 5.2/6.0 GHz speed? If they had gotten it to the point where it equaled the 1100T (4.1/4.8GHz) in per core performance, would that be considered a win? I am talking end performance here which is IPC plus clock speed. Will process maturity allow 4.1/4.8GHz in six months? Its "only" another 0.5 GHz.