zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,803
- 29,553
- 146
I love Google translate.
Thought this was great:
Friendship turn to turn the boat to say
Until I saw this:
Oh want to squatting 629 Asus, your uncle .....
Friendship turn to turn the boat to say
Oh want to squatting 629 Asus, your uncle .....
Thanks I just spit my coffee at a red light lolI love Google translate.
Thought this was great:
Until I saw this:
Thanks I just spit my coffee at a red light lol
Bumper to bumper traffic haven't moved in five minutes. People stop on green and go on red ugh.dude, are you reading forums while driving?
Yeah, I would even say that most people that understand this stuff AND have a card certainly work/write for a site/paper and are under NDA.
Edit: But if your are looking for a leak that talks about it, here you are :
https://semiaccurate.com/forums/showpost.php?p=266518&postcount=2022
Not saying its legit!
I wouldnt jump the gun...Those two, the discard accelerator and the instruction prefetch solve AMD's biggest problems from its competitor, overtesselation etc tricks AND black box code that runs poorly on AMD from GameWorks. Can't wait to see Gameworks titles benchmarks on Polaris to find out. Awesome features by the way that bruteforce their way through Nvidias tactics and are usefull in gaming.
Bumper to bumper traffic haven't moved in five minutes. People stop on green and go on red ugh.
Those two, the discard accelerator and the instruction prefetch solve AMD's biggest problems from its competitor, overtesselation etc tricks AND black box code that runs poorly on AMD from GameWorks. Can't wait to see Gameworks titles benchmarks on Polaris to find out. Awesome features by the way that bruteforce their way through Nvidias tactics and are usefull in gaming.
We have received a tip from a reader claiming he was able to run an Ethereum hashrate test on the upcoming AMD Radeon RX 480 GPUs providing us with a photo proof that we are publishing here. Do note that for the moment we cannot confirm this result for sure, but it does seems legit enough for us to consider it as a highly possible. Unfortunately the hashrate that is apparently achieved at stock frequencies is a bit disappointing at just around 24 MHS for Ethereum Dagger-Hashimoto mining with about 100W, we are also told that with a memory overclock 26-28 MHS are possible with about 120W of power usage. If these results turn out to be true the Radeon RX 480 would not be that great for mining Ethereum as we suspected recently. On the other hand the RX 470 could end up being a much more interesting choice for low power Ethereum mining if it manages to achieve the same hashrate, but at a better price when it hits the markets sometime next month. Guess we’ll have to wait a bit more to see confirmations if this is the actual hashrate for RX 480 mining Ethereum, but with the 256-bit memory bus these results unfortunately are on track with the pessimistic expectations we already had instead of the optimistic version…
They solve nothing because we know nothing about those feature. Also if a game throws visible pixel sized polygons at the screen no culling accelerator would help, especially given the fact that even DX11 allows to cull patches straight in the shader already.
Possible Ethereum Hashrate for the New AMD Radeon RX 480
http:// c r y p t o m i n i n g - b l o g . c o m
Agreed 100%.That's great news.
What clocks is your card running?
Most likely we will see more trustful leaks coming out as all media got their sample and drivers this wk.
It will prove what I been saying for quite long time... performance overall lower than 390X.
It depends on clock on aib versions. If 1400/1500 is common here its as fast if not faster than 390x for the cards that is actually sold for the 1080 res. Like the 980ti situation.Most likely we will see more trustful leaks coming out as all media got their sample and drivers this wk.
It will prove what I been saying for quite long time... performance overall lower than 390X.
- 3DMark 11 Performance
Graphics Score: 17729
- 3DMark 11 Extreme
Graphics Score: 4235
- 3DMark Fire Strike
Performance Graphics Score: 12352
Ultra Graphics Score: 2658
As a reference:
*Sapphire Radeon R9 390X GPU Score: 18566
* Geforce GTX 1070:
https://world.taobao.com/item/534158461406.htm
Most likely we will see more trustful leaks coming out as all media got their sample and drivers this wk! I'm tired of 3Dmark points.
It will prove what I been saying for quite long time... performance overall lower than 390X.
Great 3D11p score.
FS Ultra score is bad, hope it gets better with new drivers.
Ok. So mostly all 480 cards sold will be aprox 10% faster than the 390x next to it for 3dmark.If the 3DMark results above reflect gaming performance you're correct. Radeon R9 390X is:
- 4.7% faster in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU*
- 6.1% faster in 3DMark 11 Extreme GPU
- 4.8-6.3% faster in 3DMark Fire Strike Performance GPU**
- 4.5-10.1% faster in 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra GPU**
*KitGuru (VCZ result for R9 390X is lower than their R9 390 result)
**Videocardz/TweakTown