flopper
Senior member
- Dec 16, 2005
- 739
- 19
- 76
I just do not understand why AMD needed different settings on ATOS for 480 CF..
They use the same.
the game change weather which explains the discrepancy.
I just do not understand why AMD needed different settings on ATOS for 480 CF..
I just do not understand why AMD needed different settings on ATOS for 480 CF. People say that nvidia is not fair and do not post negative about AMD. Some people are felling right about AMD move for lowering settings on 480 CF to show benchmark of ATOS.
They say it's up to 2.8 and they could compare it with their previous offering, which makes matters worse. Then there is the data showing the 980 at being quite capable at this department:2.8 improvement with amd tech behind it.
how is that bragging?
Any hope this will impact 1070 pricing? D:
C7 in every single benchmark was 8 GB Model.
There is also C10 version of Polaris GPU. The question is: what is it, and will we see it live?
Surely this has HDMI 2.0, right? I see no mention of it, but I have to think it is included this time around.
http://www.amd.com/en-us/innovations/software-technologies/radeon-polaris
HDMI® 2.0b just as Pascal.
http://www.amd.com/en-us/innovations/software-technologies/radeon-polaris
HDMI® 2.0b just as Pascal.
We already got the 3Dmark numbers if true. And GP106 is 192bit, 6GB 90-100W 249-279$ from what the leaks show so far.
Where would the 1070 slot in? Polaris looks just shy of the 1080, you'd think the 1070 would be somewhere in the same area, but AMD has a supposedly huge price advantage ($199 vs $379).
The Polaris you are looking at (that is close to 1080) is crossfired cards...
Doesn't Polaris support HDMI 2.0a as well?
That makes sense.
Maybe C10 is supposed to be the 480X or 490?
EDIT: Wait Glo, this article: https://www.techpowerup.com/223043/amd-radeon-rx-480-clock-speeds-revealed-clocked-above-1-2-ghz
Doesn't this mean its the C7 and C4 is something else then? Now kinda confused.
Rumoured pricing for 8GB model is $229.
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-10-launch/
http://darlyshome.com/?p=38315
Comparing dual Radeon RX 480 to single Geforce GTX 1080. Similar performance in AotS D12. So no single GPU contender to compete with GP104, otherwise they would have compared Radeon RX 480 8GB ($250?) to Geforce GTX 1070 instead.
Also 150W? That's the same TDP as the Geforce GTX 1070.
The "67DF:C4" must be a 470X? 970 level performance for under 200 bucks is going to sell.
So I have to ask...as someone who hasn't been following hardware developments closely for, honestly, the last there years, where do the GTX 1070/1080 and the Polaris fit into the conversation, based on what we know? Someone earlier itt suggested that Nvidia would own the high-end, AMD would own the midrange, and there'd be little direct competition between the two. Does that seem to be accurate? Regarding what Firebird said above, about the Polaris benchmarks including Crossfired cards, does that mean Polaris wouldn't be comparable to the 1070, even at the $299 vs $379 price point? And I'm aware that neither of these have actually launched yet, so any answers can't really be final.
Sorry for the noob-ish questions, been out of the loop for a very long time...
So I have to ask...as someone who hasn't been following hardware developments closely for, honestly, the last there years, where do the GTX 1070/1080 and the Polaris fit into the conversation, based on what we know? Someone earlier itt suggested that Nvidia would own the high-end, AMD would own the midrange, and there'd be little direct competition between the two. Does that seem to be accurate? Regarding what Firebird said above, about the Polaris benchmarks including Crossfired cards, does that mean Polaris wouldn't be comparable to the 1070, even at the $299 vs $379 price point? And I'm aware that neither of these have actually launched yet, so any answers can't really be final.
Sorry for the noob-ish questions, been out of the loop for a very long time...