Really?Why wouldn't I believe the video? Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
Logic with people is very very weak.Of course that video is real.So you are saying he photoshopped whole benchmark in real time?
Why he is only forum warrior, then? With that skills he could be working in any movie industry including porn.
I suppose he photoshopped whole recording of video from benchmarking the GPU .
Sane people might question why they didn't demo this Geforce GTX 1070 killer as a single GPU in their presentation, had to throw Crossfire and their favourite game instead.
Will you also quote price gouging from retailers like you did to Pascal or AMD's MSRP will be chosen instead, even if zero cards are available for this price at launch?
Seems too good to be true. AMD isn't going to sell a card for ~$230 that's only 20% off of a 1070, especially when that would make a full die Polaris 10 around equal performance for ~$100 less at the moment.
You can argue about AMD wanting to grow the VR market and all kinds of other stuff, but they're still a business and at that performance level it's leaving too much money on the table.
Its real
AotS is a DX12 benchmark, AMD engineers talked about a new command processor, which is supposed to improve CU utilization under legacy loads. So I would expect different results from previous gcn architectures.Unless amd downplayed rx480 perf in aots, the numbers don't add up. In aots, we're clearly seeing dx12 perf below 390x, and closer to 390, but slightly above 980, and now in dx11 we're seeing it way above 390x and way above 980.
Maybe it's just that there were driver issues at that point? Otherwise that means polaris dx12 vs 11 is worse than nvidia?
Really?
Logic with people is very very weak.Of course that video is real.
Are you serious?
If the video is real, then why would he have to photoshop anything?
Are you serious?
If the video is real, then why would he have to photoshop anything?
While Radeon Technologies Group was conceptualizing Polaris, they kept their ear to the ground and learned what their community wanted right now, but also what their community desired 2 years from now. Hook says this resulted in five key takeaways:
1: Prestige. “They wanted the prestige of a $700 graphics card, but they didn’t want to have to pay for it,” Hook begins.
2: VR that just works. “They wanted the ability to have a great VR experience today or two years from now without worrying about upgrading power supplies and digging into their PC. They wanted to buy a headset at some point and just have it work.”
3: Respect their investment. “They wanted us to pay respect to the dollars they were giving us and do things in the architecture or transistors or APIs or ASync Compute, that provided a measure of ‘futureproofness.’ They wanted to be reassured that even if they’re only spending $200 they’d feel secure in their investment for a couple years.”
4: More overclocking control. “We brainstormed what kind of voltage control could be given to them to create a better experience.
Interesting
5: Better drivers. “We feel we’ve made a great first step there, and we’re only going to be putting a heavier foot on the gas this year and next year to make those drivers better and better.”
I had a visceral reaction, but then again I'm from Eastern Europe: that red revolution was actually about 1% of the population having full control over the rest, exactly the opposite of what they were claiming.What do you think of AMD's new marketing campaign Comrades ?
Who knows what the future holds. Instead of gimpworks or something such, they came with a new API which is moving things forward for us in gaming. So if they think of something, you may as well see it becoming real. AMD/ RTG has been quite good like that.I am still wondering if all they have for VR is a good price. With so much emphasis on VR I'd expect them to actually invest in it with some cool new features.
I am still wondering if all they have for VR is a good price. With so much emphasis on VR I'd expect them to actually invest in it with some cool new features.
What do you think of AMD's new marketing campaign Comrades ?
Weren't they already miles ahead of nvidia in terms of VR performance? Nvidia's new VR features just made their GPU's not suck at VR which wasn't an AMD problem in the first place.
I had a visceral reaction, but then again I'm from Eastern Europe: that red revolution was actually about 1% of the population having full control over the rest, exactly the opposite of what they were claiming.
I don't like it, even as a joke.