http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-polaris-10-mainstream-gpu,31879.html
this is the direct link. i hope it works
In terms of VR, they better have the same or better features than Nvidia. Else that part is way gone. And power efficiency needs to be really good.
That's just the refresh rate of the monitor. Doesn't mean the game is running at 144 fps.No effin way! They even printed 144hz on the label! Wasn't the 1080 running this thing at 1080 with about 200fps?!
Who is this Thrax person anyway? Is he a member of this forum? Maybe we could get more tidbits out of him...
OOOoohhHH, then why did they delete his post on twitter? Is that espionage?
Well, it's 1440p OpenGL vs 1080p Vulkan, but regardless, there's little we can learn from that picture except that AMD hasn't got a Vulkan build and of course the name.No effin way! They even printed 144hz on the label! Wasn't the 1080 running this thing at 1080 with about 200fps?!
No effin way! They even printed 144hz on the label! Wasn't the 1080 running this thing at 1080 with about 200fps?!
Well, it's 1440p OpenGL vs 1080p Vulkan, but regardless, there's little we can learn from that picture except that AMD hasn't got a Vulkan build and of course the name.
You do realize that tech demo was for freesync, showing off a curved 144Hz display, none of which exists today on the market.
The refresh rate has nothing to do with frames rates, it was about the display.
Ohhh, I did know that. So the game shipped on OpenGL I take? Why would NVidia use the Vulkan build for their demo?
Nevermind then. Though it would make sense if the GPU would be able to handle the display's hz in their own demo show. What brand is it btw?
BlitzWulf, what did the tweet say?
And why do the press get to go hands on with this for a month before launch? What would be the point of that? I say soft-launch that thing next week!
You do realize that tech demo was for freesync, showing off a curved 144Hz display, none of which exists today on the market.
The refresh rate has nothing to do with frames rates, it was about the display.
That is standard procedure really the press needs time with these products before release so that their viewers can see their favorite journo's,reviewer's,youtuber's etc. opinion of a product before they buy it.
But an entire MONTH?! All we really need from these reviewers are benchmarks and numbers.
just by reading this forum extensively for the last 2 years, yes, it is true, 100%.
One month is a reasonable amount of time for every media website to be on even ground when the cards are actually released and on the market (June 29th!).
That panel is Lenovo's.Does show who made the panel. The actual "monitor" is most likely unbranded. AMD often develops products to show off technology, or to work with partners. They have developed several laptop dev platforms. They are use for testing, demoing to the press, and working with partners.