AMD Polaris Thread: Radeon RX 480, RX 470 & RX 460 launching June 29th

Page 170 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

R0H1T

Platinum Member
Jan 12, 2013
2,582
162
106
By the time VR matters/matures, with enough supporting titles and improved, better priced VR hardware, we'll probably already be on Volta, Navi. I doubt many people will factor in VR performance when looking at lower-mid range Polaris.
Why do you think VR is geared mainly towards gamers? If anything the applications in academia, medical & even general entertainment is an order of magnitude that of the gaming industry & they're the first ones on the VR bandwagon, scientists & researchers especially.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
AIB partners are reporting to me this morning that with extremely good custom air coolers the 480 GPUs are seeing from 1480MHz to 1600MHz clocks, but tell me it is a "lottery draw" on GPUs.

That makes no sense. If someone put fan on RX 480 ref to 100% and still can't OC, it's not a thermal issue.

Esp if AIB cards can do up to 1.6Ghz. If that's true, it screams artificial gimping from AMD. Bios restrictions on clocks or a very low power/voltage limit on the ref card to artificially create more expensive AIB variants for a higher segment.
 

antihelten

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2012
1,764
274
126
That makes no sense. If someone put fan on RX 480 ref to 100% and still can't OC, it's not a thermal issue.

Esp if AIB cards can do up to 1.6Ghz. If that's true, it screams artificial gimping from AMD. Bios restrictions on clocks or a very low power/voltage limit on the ref card to artificially create more expensive AIB variants for a higher segment.

It may not be artificial as such, and possibly just a question of reviewers not adjusting the fan speed.

The youtube review tried overclocking and had the temperature shoot up to 91 degrees and any higher and it would crash. It is possible that increasing the fan speed could keep the temperature down and thus leave more headroom for overclocking (with AIB cards already running cool enough that this isn't necessary).

Calm down, folks. He admitted to using old drivers.

Not really, he just said that he didn't use 16.6.1 or 16.2.2, and that the drivers were press only. Whether or not they are old is up in the air.
 
Last edited:

MTDEW

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 1999
4,284
37
91
That makes no sense. If someone put fan on RX 480 ref to 100% and still can't OC, it's not a thermal issue.

Esp if AIB cards can do up to 1.6Ghz. If that's true, it screams artificial gimping from AMD. Bios restrictions on clocks or a very low power/voltage limit on the ref card to artificially create more expensive AIB variants for a higher segment.
Or it's artificially/intentionally being done to the reference versions simply to keep the temps in check for the reference versions at a quiet fan speed/curve.
They certainly cannot afford another 290(x) temp/throttling/loud reference cooler disaster in the press.
I know if I was AMD that would be the LAST thing I'd want.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
Or it's artificially/intentionally being done to the reference versions simply to keep the temps in check for the reference versions at a quiet fan speed/curve.
They certainly cannot afford another 290(x) temp/throttling/loud reference cooler disaster in the press.
I know if I was AMD that would be the LAST thing I'd want.

That's a good point.

Well, I already ordered 2x RX 480 8GB. I'll test the thermals myself on OC, and can always put water AIO on it for further experimentation.
 

antihelten

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2012
1,764
274
126
It may not be artificial as such, and possibly just a question of reviewers not adjusting the fan speed.

The youtube review tried overclocking and had the temperature shoot up to 91 degrees and any higher and it would crash. It is possible that increasing the fan speed could keep the temperature down and thus leave more headroom for overclocking (with AIB cards already running cool enough that this isn't necessary).

Just read through some of the reviewers comments on youtube, and he mentions that he did in fact fiddle around with the fan, so cooling shouldn't be the issue here.
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
It's a $200 TO $240 CARD FOR GOODNESS SAKE! AMD packed a lot of performance in a card for that price range.

Let us all calm down and wait for all of the reviews to start rolling in.

I think AMD's real goal is to produce a large scale market share card that is affordable. So far it looks like AMD is in the ballpark with the RX480.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Hey Rus, isn't Vega 10 the big chip (meant for Fury) and Vega 11 the smaller one (meant for RX 490) ?

Kaduri noted that the naming convention is related to the timeline, not size of the chip. If Vega 10 and 11 come true, the 10 version launches first. It should be a smaller and slower chip than the 11 version. The concerning part is if Vega 10 is meant to be a 1070/1080 competitor, then when is Vega 11 launching? If Vega 11 is also 6-9 months behind GP102, then that would be bad news. One can hope that if AMD is 6-9 months behind with high-end cards that they will either try to beat NV outright or at least shake up the price/performance in a way R9 290 did.

---

32 ROPs and lack of GDDD5X only reinforce the mainstream/performance targeting aspects of RX480. Since this is an R9 380/X replacement, I wouldn't start freaking out about a failed "Fiji" style chip. HardOCP has no clue what they are talking about. If AMD was designing an R9 390/390X replacement, it wouldn't be 232mm2 and have only 256-bit bus and 32 ROPs. It can't be more obvious that HardOCP is just wrong, and yet we see people repeating over and over how RX 480 is a failed 390/390X "successor".

Also, I remember so many people wishing for Polaris 10 to be as fast as a Fury/X/980Ti and I warned against setting unrealistic expectations. Low end/mainstream chip = low end/mainstream price. The hype got out of control.

The concern here is if NV matches or beats 480, AMD will most likely have a gap in the entire $300-700 range until Q1 2017. I expect to read A LOT of biased/NV PR posts about how Polaris for GPUs is AMD's Bulldozer for CPUs (i.e., AMD is officially out of high-end/performance space). AMD's desire to launch Bottom-Up this time seems to have confused most of the Internet and even some review sites...
 

agfkfhahddhdn

Senior member
Dec 14, 2003
318
2
81
So, if it had 64 ROPs would it still be 232mm² and $200? Is there a better combination at that size/price?

Probably not, and smaller die size = less materials = cheaper to produce. The idea behind Polaris seems to be to squeeze as much out of as little as possible so you can sell a normally low-margin, high-volume product for a much larger margin, but still at a high-volume price point. If they can do that, it appears they'll be able to, they'll both recapture market share and take a big step toward returning to profitability.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
It's a $200 TO $240 CARD FOR GOODNESS SAKE! AMD packed a lot of performance in a card for that price range.

Let us all calm down and wait for all of the reviews to start rolling in.

I think AMD's real goal is to produce a large scale market share card that is affordable. So far it looks like AMD is in the ballpark with the RX480.

The voice of reason! Too many believe AMD's Polaris 10 is a Hawaii successor. As a result of this flawed assumption, they believe that AMD is either entirely sacrificing performance gains for next gen in favor of perf/watt and/or they think AMD's engineers failed completely and Polaris 10 was "originally" intended to compete with 1070/1080.
 

Head1985

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2014
1,866
699
136
So, if it had 64 ROPs would it still be 232mm² and $200? Is there a better combination at that size/price?

We still dont know transitor count.But 2048SP and 64Rops will be like 15-20% faster than 2304SP and 32Rops and probably more at 1440P(25% my guess).

That SKu will be like 250-260mm2 MAX.
Dont see why that SKU should not be priced at 250USD.
 
Last edited:
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
I expect to read A LOT of biased/NV PR posts about how Polaris for GPUs is AMD's Bulldozer for CPUs (i.e., AMD is officially out of high-end/performance space). AMD's desire to launch Bottom-Up this time seems to have confused most of the Internet and even some review sites...

What? What about the 750Ti, NV launched Maxwell bottom first... nobody made an issue out of it?

RX 490 is coming before the end of the year.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |