AMD Q2 Result.

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
Getting off topic, but come on, all the 14nm delays have put a big question mark in Intels mobile plans. Cherry Trail seems a disaster with no cpu performance improvement, and where are all the integrated modems they needed yesterday? Meanwhile, ARM and Apple just keep marching along, bringing out new and faster products, and becoming even more firmly entrenched.
 

Dresdenboy

Golden Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,730
554
136
citavia.blog.de
You can try take the semicustom for AMD in all its quarters and see the result yourself.

Example:
Q2 2014: 613M$ revenue, 97M$ profit.
Q1 2015: 498M$ revenue, 45M$ profit.
Q2 2015: 563M$ revenue, 27M$ profit.
Could be a positive effect of the OEMs leveling the production throughout the year. Even they using Foxconn or others can't scale production by these factors.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
Getting off topic, but come on, all the 14nm delays have put a big question mark in Intels mobile plans. Cherry Trail seems a disaster with no cpu performance improvement, and where are all the integrated modems they needed yesterday? Meanwhile, ARM and Apple just keep marching along, bringing out new and faster products, and becoming even more firmly entrenched.

Cherry Trail was never about CPU performance. But about IGP and BOM.

Did you see Qualcomms result?
 

dark zero

Platinum Member
Jun 2, 2015
2,655
140
106
Getting off topic, but come on, all the 14nm delays have put a big question mark in Intels mobile plans. Cherry Trail seems a disaster with no cpu performance improvement, and where are all the integrated modems they needed yesterday? Meanwhile, ARM and Apple just keep marching along, bringing out new and faster products, and becoming even more firmly entrenched.
Cherry Trail is not seeming to be a dissaster... IS a dissaster... The GPU increases are heavily nerfed by thhe CPU brutal nerf. It makes AMD Mullins looks competent again. Is a total step back from Intel. Seems that Atom uarch is about to fail hard.
They need a STRONG revamp just like Nehalem to SB
 

Sweepr

Diamond Member
May 12, 2006
5,148
1,143
131
Cherry Trail is not seeming to be a dissaster... IS a dissaster... The GPU increases are heavily nerfed by thhe CPU brutal nerf. It makes AMD Mullins looks competent again. Is a total step back from Intel. Seems that Atom uarch is about to fail hard.
They need a STRONG revamp just like Nehalem to SB

http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/1027/images/Surface3Chart-8.jpg
http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/1027/images/Surface3Chart-11.jpg
http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/1027/images/Surface3Chart-5.jpg

There's a Cherry Trail product on the market perfoming similar to AMD's publicity stunt reference platform.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,543
4,327
136


Contra revenued eliminated would be more accurate if you had an once of honnesty, we all know that Baytrail was prefered due to its superior perfs, isnt it...

So Intel comes one year later with a chip that is barely competitive with 28nm Mullins and that s all nirvana in the Intel supporting team..?.

Where are the power measurements, after all it s all about mobile..?.

Edit : Perhaps that you can post them in the relevant thread to keep this one from being constantly derailed...
 
Last edited:

Sweepr

Diamond Member
May 12, 2006
5,148
1,143
131
Contra revenued eliminated would be more accurate if you had an once of honnesty, we all know that Baytrail was prefered due to its superior perfs, isnt it...

So Intel comes one year later with a chip that is barely competitive with 28nm Mullins and that s all nirvana in the Intel supporting team..?.

Where are the power measurements, after all it s all about mobile..?.

Reported.
Anyone can measure Surface 3's power consumption, it's not something forbidden like the Mullins reference platform AMD sent to reviewers to make it look competitive inside a 11.6'' thick chassis that doesn't resemble any typical 7-8'' tablet Bay Trail-T product. They obviously had to hide the outrageous power numbers and put a giant chassis to allow it to sustain Turbo speeds even though they knew it would fail miserably to deliver this kind of performance inside a real small tablet, you know, similar to your Core M accusations. OEMs obviously knew that, hence why it almost didn't make it to the tablet market. Do you really think they couldn't have launched such a product at higher prices if it really outclassed BT-T like that? Surface 3 at $500 is the proof they could. They didn't because Mullins is just smoke and mirrors, like most AMD launches, another PowerPoint slides champion.

Ps: Braswell completely smokes your precious Kabini in perf/watt, even AMD-biased Hardware.fr aknowledges that:
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/imprimer/936/
 
Last edited:

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,543
4,327
136
Reported.
Anyone can measure Surface 3's power consumption, it's not something forbidden like the Mullins reference platform AMD sent to reviewers to make it look competitive inside a 11.6'' thick chassis that doesn't resemble any typical 7-8'' tablet Bay Trail-T product. They obviously had to hide the outrageous power numbers and put a giant chassis to allow it to sustain Turbo speeds even though they knew it would fail miserably to deliver this kind of performance inside a real small tablet, you know, similar to your Core M accusations. OEMs obviously knew that, hence why it almost didn't make it to the market. Do you really think they couldn't have launched such a product at higher prices if it really outclassed BT like that? Surface 3 at $500 is the proof they could.

Ps: Braswell completely smokes your precious Kabini in perf/watt, even AMD-biased Hardware.fr aknowledges that:
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/imprimer/936/

LOL...

You realize that you are denying that Contra revenues are the cause of Mullins being not present in W8 tablets..?..

I stand by my post that whoever say otherwise is intellectualy dishonnest.

As for Hardawre.fr review i did read it, cherry trail smoke nothing, CPU perf/Watt is not improved, quite the contrary, GPU is much improved but TDP is understated by Intel as proved by this review that yield roughly 10W at the SoC level for the higher grade part...

All they did was to reduce frequency by 10-20% because this improve mechanicaly the perf/Watt by the same ratio, that s completely irrelevant as comparison wich must be done at equal frequency and electrical environment...

Edit : As pointed post the infos in your btrail thread, why keeping derailing this one..??.

You are afraid that i wouldnt answer there..?.
 
Last edited:
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126

AMD isnt the competition in this space, it is Apple and ARM. Did you see the sales for the iPhone 6 in Anand's recent article?

But I dont want to derail this into a thread bashing Intel's mobile efforts, there are plenty of amd fans more than willing to do that. Point is, I dont think we should be so critical of AMD's console sales just because they are low margin. At this point, they are all that is keeping them alive.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,543
4,327
136
AMD isnt the competition in this space, it is Apple and ARM. Did you see the sales for the iPhone 6 in Anand's recent article?

AMD are a competitor like any other in the mobile/low power market, that they are targeting only a given segment of the market doesnt render them irrelevant.

They knew from the start that they wouldnt be competitive for 100-200$ MRSP offerings so they targeted the 200-400$ segment with 2C/4C Mullins wich was cut down for the purpose.

Competitivness was rendered moot by the practices you know, i mean with 30 millions subsided chips used in W8 items there was no ground left for any other W8 product, that s an amount of chips that must be at least 3X what AMD has targeted for the whole low power line in one year....

Still, in a dwindling W8 market we have some people arguing that it couldnt have had the slihtest influence for AMD financials and their low power APUs sales.
 

dark zero

Platinum Member
Jun 2, 2015
2,655
140
106

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
Are you comparing the BEST INTEL PRODUCT avaliable against a prototype with outdated drivers? Seriously?

He is comparing an actual, marketable product against a prototype, so if anything the comparison should be beneficial to AMD.
 

monstercameron

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2013
3,818
1
0
Microsoft: just got done killing much of their hardware division off. No way.
Apple: They don't need it, I'd think. They have their ARM stuff already in house.


It doesn't have gpu expertise though afaik, didn't they divest their share in imgtec or was that Intel?
 
Last edited:

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
15,176
5,717
136
I think the suitors are waiting for bankruptcy. With all that debt, AMD as a whole is worthless.

Microsoft: just got done killing much of their hardware division off. No way.
Apple: They don't need it, I'd think. They have their ARM stuff already in house.

Apple would be interested in the GPU IP.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
I think the suitors are waiting for bankruptcy. With all that debt, AMD as a whole is worthless.

Ye, nobody sane will buy AMD as a whole. Obligations, debt, restructuring etc. Just endless pain and a bottomless hole for money.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Ye, nobody sane will buy AMD as a whole. Obligations, debt, restructuring etc. Just endless pain and a bottomless hole for money.

I am thinking maybe they are waiting to loot it in bankruptcy? Right now liabilities are substantial along with contracts with GloFo. Bankruptcy can wipe the contract out and negotiate liabilities down.
 

RampantAndroid

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2004
6,591
3
81
I think the suitors are waiting for bankruptcy. With all that debt, AMD as a whole is worthless.



Apple would be interested in the GPU IP.

While I don't doubt Apple would be interested, I think they'd rather negotiate to get it without getting ALL of AMD. I cannot see Apple buying everything.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
I am thinking maybe they are waiting to loot it in bankruptcy? Right now liabilities are substantial along with contracts with GloFo. Bankruptcy can wipe the contract out and negotiate liabilities down.

If anyone wants anything IP related, everything points to doing so if AMD goes bankrupt. Any workers others with more cash want is already gone.

One thing is sure, nobody wants the whole deal.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |