Except Fury X uses more power and is slower so i'm not sure what the forbes editor is smoking.
When it comes to flagship cards, raw power is what people want.
Srsly, this is just trolling now.
The article did not say one card "won the race, game over, GTFO other card".
Get your effing 980 Ti to replace the sorry 680 setup and leave us alone.
Looks like someone put together a quadfire setup already...
Looks like someone put together a quadfire setup already...
Tell you what, you gift me $650 via paypal and I'll do just that. I'll take care of tax and shipping costs. Otherwise, I'll keep posting in whichever sub forum peaks my interest, within the guidelines of the forum rules which is what I'm doing here.
Doesn't the radiator need to be above the pump? I see two placed below the cards.
Not as far as I'm concerned:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37491829&postcount=1
The sticky was your first warning. This post is your second, and I don't have $650 for you either.
-- stahlhart
The AMD and Nvidia graphics sub-forums are intended primarily for members who are owners of the respective hardware to seek out and offer peer level technical support, compare and contrast performance and results with other owners, discuss driver updates and installation issues, firmware/cooling modifications, etc.
They are NOT intended for debate, rumor speculation, comparisons between competing brands, or company/business related news. The general Video Cards & Graphics forum is the place for this, as was the case previously. Confine these areas of discussion there, and stop it here immediately.
Consider this your first warning.
so this is the jerk that bought all the fury x's!
Haha, maybe that's the target marke quad fire and red theme cases. I don't think that person will be disappointed by the performance.
In the HardOCP review, they use a 3770K, not a 2011 / 2011 v2.
And no mention of 980 Ti being reference or aftermarket or boost clocks of said card.
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2015/06/24/amd_radeon_r9_fury_x_video_card_review/3#.VYw2RPmjNcY
When it's on a game that runs well, Fury X is near 295x2 performance. When it isn't, it is barely faster than 290X. I wonder what's wrong?
[H] is saying that the Fury X is VRAM bottlenecked on Dying Light at 1440p, yet on 4k, it is close to 980 ti performance.
I'll be interested to see how upcoming drivers change performance.
the guy has 16,000 shaders! 16,000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it is over 9000!
You think that's impressive? Nvidia has an off-the-shelf box that has 8 Quadro M6000 cards for a total of 24,576 shaders.
geez how much does that cost?!?!?
find it sad really no review use Mantle for BF4 except semiaccurate.
I think nvidia does zero fps there.
anyone buying a fury for bf4 will use Mantle.
it offers better latency smoother gameplay and hardocp couldnt measure that for some reason.