AMD Radeon HD 9970 Specifications Leaked – Twice as fast as GTX 780 (ChipLoco rumor)

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Black Octagon

Golden Member
Dec 10, 2012
1,410
2
81
Actually I have NOT read any reliable confirmation that the announcement on 23 September is even intended to go for the single card crown, let alone the single GPU crown
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
Can't wait for this AMD big die GPU monster to release and seeing the benchmarks pour in
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
How many APUs will be used to get 499 place from Top500? 7000000000 APUs? :sneaky:

You have to consider the price difference. In large clusters CPU's have to be there regardless. If that CPU contains a GPU in it with half decent performance, but no added cost, that is a huge advantage for AMD. Tesla cards are expensive, and are an additional cost over the CPU's.
 

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,475
136
Actually I have NOT read any reliable confirmation that the announcement on 23 September is even intended to go for the single card crown, let alone the single GPU crown

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...h-gpu-codenamed-hawaii-in-hawaii-sept-25.aspx

"We just got confirmation that AMD will be announcing their latest GPU codenamed Hawaii. The event will be scheduled during the week of September 23rd, and there will be a live streamed public event on the 25th that will introduce AMD's new flagship GPU to the world."

"AMD is clearly gunning to compete with Nvidia's GeForce GTX Titan and we'll see if AMD can deliver us a single GPU solution that can compete with Nvidia's own $1000 GPU."

http://semiaccurate.com/2013/08/07/amd-to-launch-hawaii-in-hawaii/

"It looks like new GPUs are coming this fall with AMD’s Hawaii now set for late September. This one is going to change the market mainly because there is no competition for it this year."

"Hawaii and the Volcanic Islands family is coming this fall and a late September public show likely means an October silicon launch. This is a massively updated GPU vs the minor tweaks in the last round. Given the timing, Hawaii is unquestionably a 28nm part so no shrink related performance bump but the architectural changes should more than make up for that. It is unlikely to be an incremental advance."

"Update 8/7/13 @ 4pm: AMD has clarified that it is the Hawaii/Volcanic Islands tech day in September, not the launch. The launch will officially happen in Q4 some time"


http://techreport.com/news/25258/report-amd-hawaii-graphics-cards-to-mass-ship-in-october

"DigiTimes specifically refers to Hawaii as a next-gen high-end GPU, so there's little room for misinterpretation on that front.

Kicking off shipments in early October, a week or so after the press event, wouldn't be unusual."

http://videocardz.com/45523/retail-amd-radeon-r9-9000-series-arrive-mid-october

"The AMD Radeon 9k series are just around the corner. Few weeks ago we told you that the new series will launch in October. Since then we did not have any proof. That’s until now. Most of you probably know that Hawaii GPU will be shown by AMD in late September. Of course this will only be the official announcement. The new retail models will hit the shelves in mid October according to our latest information."

You can take the information with how much ever salt you want. :biggrin: But few things are clear.

1. 28nm flagship AMD GPU launching .
2. significant improvement over Tahiti. GK110 competitor.
3. Sep 25th press event. mid October retail launch.

If people don't want to believe any of this thats fine.its only 40 days to launch. all doubts will be settled by Oct 15th :thumbsup:
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...h-gpu-codenamed-hawaii-in-hawaii-sept-25.aspx

"We just got confirmation that AMD will be announcing their latest GPU codenamed Hawaii. The event will be scheduled during the week of September 23rd, and there will be a live streamed public event on the 25th that will introduce AMD's new flagship GPU to the world."

"AMD is clearly gunning to compete with Nvidia's GeForce GTX Titan and we'll see if AMD can deliver us a single GPU solution that can compete with Nvidia's own $1000 GPU."

http://semiaccurate.com/2013/08/07/amd-to-launch-hawaii-in-hawaii/

"It looks like new GPUs are coming this fall with AMD’s Hawaii now set for late September. This one is going to change the market mainly because there is no competition for it this year."

"Hawaii and the Volcanic Islands family is coming this fall and a late September public show likely means an October silicon launch. This is a massively updated GPU vs the minor tweaks in the last round. Given the timing, Hawaii is unquestionably a 28nm part so no shrink related performance bump but the architectural changes should more than make up for that. It is unlikely to be an incremental advance."

"Update 8/7/13 @ 4pm: AMD has clarified that it is the Hawaii/Volcanic Islands tech day in September, not the launch. The launch will officially happen in Q4 some time"


http://techreport.com/news/25258/report-amd-hawaii-graphics-cards-to-mass-ship-in-october

"DigiTimes specifically refers to Hawaii as a next-gen high-end GPU, so there's little room for misinterpretation on that front.

Kicking off shipments in early October, a week or so after the press event, wouldn't be unusual."

http://videocardz.com/45523/retail-amd-radeon-r9-9000-series-arrive-mid-october

"The AMD Radeon 9k series are just around the corner. Few weeks ago we told you that the new series will launch in October. Since then we did not have any proof. That’s until now. Most of you probably know that Hawaii GPU will be shown by AMD in late September. Of course this will only be the official announcement. The new retail models will hit the shelves in mid October according to our latest information."

You can take the information with how much ever salt you want. :biggrin: But few things are clear.

1. 28nm flagship AMD GPU launching .
2. significant improvement over Tahiti. GK110 competitor.
3. Sep 25th press event. mid October retail launch.

If people don't want to believe any of this thats fine.its only 40 days to launch. all doubts will be settled by Oct 15th :thumbsup:

All this text and still doesn't clearly identify a single big GPU from AMD.
Unless you weren't intending to offer this as proof of such. If not, I apologize.

Sure, 28nm is more than plausible and downright likely.
Significant improvement over Tahiti (on what metric? Performance? Compute? Power consumption to performance ratio?) Wide open.
Dates are really irrelevent.

"and we'll see if AMD can deliver us a single GPU solution that can compete with Nvidia's own $1000 GPU."
Even they don't know. hehe.
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
Clicked this thread and it is about as silly as I expected. I'll tune back in a month from now.
 

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,475
136
All this text and still doesn't clearly identify a single big GPU from AMD. Unless you weren't intending to offer this as proof of such. If not, I apologize.

I clearly stated we have to wait 40 days for the facts. :thumbsup: 20 days if you are the press. :biggrin: But you do get an idea of what to expect.

Sure, 28nm is more than plausible and downright likely.
Significant improvement over Tahiti (on what metric? Performance? Compute? Power consumption to performance ratio?) Wide open.
Dates are really irrelevent.

Hawaii will beat Tahiti on every metric. Perf - both gaming and compute, perf/watt and perf/sq mm. Hawaii is based on the next iteration of GCN - GCN 2.0. Hawaii includes

1.) Architectural and efficiency improvements
2.) Process related design improvements.
3.) Power management related improvements.

You can verify all 3 metrics on launch. But I am confident AMD have done it. :thumbsup:
 

SolMiester

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2004
5,331
17
76
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...h-gpu-codenamed-hawaii-in-hawaii-sept-25.aspx

"We just got confirmation that AMD will be announcing their latest GPU codenamed Hawaii. The event will be scheduled during the week of September 23rd, and there will be a live streamed public event on the 25th that will introduce AMD's new flagship GPU to the world."

"AMD is clearly gunning to compete with Nvidia's GeForce GTX Titan and we'll see if AMD can deliver us a single GPU solution that can compete with Nvidia's own $1000 GPU."

http://semiaccurate.com/2013/08/07/amd-to-launch-hawaii-in-hawaii/

"It looks like new GPUs are coming this fall with AMD’s Hawaii now set for late September. This one is going to change the market mainly because there is no competition for it this year."

"Hawaii and the Volcanic Islands family is coming this fall and a late September public show likely means an October silicon launch. This is a massively updated GPU vs the minor tweaks in the last round. Given the timing, Hawaii is unquestionably a 28nm part so no shrink related performance bump but the architectural changes should more than make up for that. It is unlikely to be an incremental advance."

"Update 8/7/13 @ 4pm: AMD has clarified that it is the Hawaii/Volcanic Islands tech day in September, not the launch. The launch will officially happen in Q4 some time"


http://techreport.com/news/25258/report-amd-hawaii-graphics-cards-to-mass-ship-in-october

"DigiTimes specifically refers to Hawaii as a next-gen high-end GPU, so there's little room for misinterpretation on that front.

Kicking off shipments in early October, a week or so after the press event, wouldn't be unusual."

http://videocardz.com/45523/retail-amd-radeon-r9-9000-series-arrive-mid-october

"The AMD Radeon 9k series are just around the corner. Few weeks ago we told you that the new series will launch in October. Since then we did not have any proof. That’s until now. Most of you probably know that Hawaii GPU will be shown by AMD in late September. Of course this will only be the official announcement. The new retail models will hit the shelves in mid October according to our latest information."

You can take the information with how much ever salt you want. :biggrin: But few things are clear.

1. 28nm flagship AMD GPU launching .
2. significant improvement over Tahiti. GK110 competitor.
3. Sep 25th press event. mid October retail launch.

If people don't want to believe any of this thats fine.its only 40 days to launch. all doubts will be settled by Oct 15th :thumbsup:

I dont know if reporter announcements equal AMD announcements when it comes to GPU crowns?
 

SolMiester

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2004
5,331
17
76
I clearly stated we have to wait 40 days for the facts. :thumbsup: 20 days if you are the press. :biggrin: But you do get an idea of what to expect.



Hawaii will beat Tahiti on every metric. Perf - both gaming and compute, perf/watt and perf/sq mm. Hawaii is based on the next iteration of GCN - GCN 2.0. Hawaii includes

1.) Architectural and efficiency improvements
2.) Process related design improvements.
3.) Power management related improvements.

You can verify all 3 metrics on launch. But I am confident AMD have done it. :thumbsup:

Havent AMD lost the Head GPU designer of GCN?, what was his name?, Eric something.....
I truly think some people are expecting too much from this GPU when you have to consider that they lost the guy who built the original architecture, have to compete on same node, and havent built a big die in over 5 yrs...
To me, this all just sounds like the last CPU launch expectations....
 

LegSWAT

Member
Jul 8, 2013
75
0
0
Havent AMD lost the Head GPU designer of GCN?, what was his name?, Eric something.....
I truly think some people are expecting too much from this GPU when you have to consider that they lost the guy who built the original architecture, have to compete on same node, and havent built a big die in over 5 yrs...
To me, this all just sounds like the last CPU launch expectations....

Eric Demers. Actually expectations that Hawai is somewhat on par with a GTX780 or slightly above are anything but far fetched. For a company as ATI/AMD, a 400+ mm² die is no magic either. Keep in mind that current GCN tech would be totally sufficient to match GTX780 levels on a 440-450mm² die when using same transistor densities as Pitcarin or Bonaire.
 

Spyhawk

Junior Member
Oct 25, 2010
11
0
66
Eric Demers was just one dude who oversaw the work done on GCN by many other people. Don't worry. I think their are many more GPU tech savy engineers at AMD who can handle themselves well in regards to gcn 2.0 or any other future gpu archetectures.
 

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,475
136
Havent AMD lost the Head GPU designer of GCN?, what was his name?, Eric something.....
I truly think some people are expecting too much from this GPU when you have to consider that they lost the guy who built the original architecture, have to compete on same node, and havent built a big die in over 5 yrs...
To me, this all just sounds like the last CPU launch expectations....

GTX 780 is 20% faster than HD 7970 Ghz. Titan is 30% faster than HD 7970 Ghz.

http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/grafikkarten/2013/nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-im-test/3/
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...s/61310-nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-review-15.html

AMD has gone big die whether you like it or not. I am sure matching Titan is not a problem for AMD.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
GTX 780 is 20% faster than HD 7970 Ghz. Titan is 30% faster than HD 7970 Ghz.

Using a stock 780 as a point of reference is convenient but hardly relevant for consumers since after-market versions are selling for $20 more and they are 35-36% faster.




Then there is the HOF 780 which demolishes every 780 out of the box -- "...our GALAXY 780 HOF runs at a real-time frequency of 1.1GHz while gaming, in every game! Therefore, a reference 780 runs at 900MHz while gaming, and the GALAXY GTX 780 HOF Edition runs at 1.1GHz while gaming, a whopping 200MHz faster out-of-the-box."

That means the HOF 780 is 20% faster than the stock 780 or 40% faster than a 7970GE for only $40 more over the reference 780.
 

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,475
136
Using a stock 780 as a point of reference is convenient but hardly relevant for consumers since after-market versions are selling for $20 more and they are 35-36% faster.




Then there is the HOF 780 which demolishes every 780 out of the box -- "...our GALAXY 780 HOF runs at a real-time frequency of 1.1GHz while gaming, in every game! Therefore, a reference 780 runs at 900MHz while gaming, and the GALAXY GTX 780 HOF Edition runs at 1.1GHz while gaming, a whopping 200MHz faster out-of-the-box."

That means the HOF 780 is 20% faster than the stock 780 or 40% faster than a 7970GE for only $40 more over the reference 780.

RS for the nth time stop building up the GTX 780 to be much bigger than what it is. for double the price of HD 7970 cards its an underwhelming 30% faster on average. both avg OC vs avg OC and max OC vs OC.

here is a HOF 780(1.3 Ghz) vs HD 7970(1.275 Ghz)

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/08/14/galaxy_geforce_gtx_780_hof_edition_review/3#.UigTWX_3x8E

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/08/14/galaxy_geforce_gtx_780_hof_edition_review/6#.UigM-n_3x8E

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/06/06/msi_n770_lightning_overclocking_review/3#.UigPEH_3x8E

Metro Last Light 2560 x 1600 AAA Very High settings

HOF 780 OC - 65.0 (38% faster)
HD 7970 OC - 47.1

Farcry 3 2560 x 1600 Ultra 2X MSAA

HOF 780 OC - 50.2 (29% faster)
HD 7970 OC - 38.8

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013...rectcu_ii_oc_video_card_review/8#.UigOzH_3x8E

Hitman Absolution 2560 x 1600 4x MSAA

GTX 780 OC (1.23 Ghz) - 64.3
HD 7970(1.1 Ghz) - 51.8

Hitman is more like 15 - 20% at max OC.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013...rectcu_ii_oc_video_card_review/6#.UigQ0H_3x8E

Crysis 3 2560 X 1600 Very High settings SMAA 2TX

GTX 780 OC(1.23 Ghz) - 45.4
HD 7970(1.1 Ghz) - 31.7

In Crysis 3 a HD 7970(1.2 Ghz) would be around 35 fps at same settings. so the difference is 30%.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/08/14/galaxy_geforce_gtx_780_hof_edition_review/4#.UigTxH_3x8E

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/06/06/msi_n770_lightning_overclocking_review/3#.UigPEH_3x8E

Tombraider 2560 x 1600 Highest settiings FXAA Tress FX

GTX 780 OC(1.23 Ghz) - 55.7
HD 7970(1.1 Ghz) - 49.0

14% faster.

avg of 30% difference is probably correct once you add a few more TWIMTBP games. for double the price. not so great. :thumbsdown: Hawaii by mid -october will put things in a different perspective.
 
Last edited:

Arzachel

Senior member
Apr 7, 2011
903
76
91
All this text and still doesn't clearly identify a single big GPU from AMD.
Unless you weren't intending to offer this as proof of such. If not, I apologize.

Sure, 28nm is more than plausible and downright likely.
Significant improvement over Tahiti (on what metric? Performance? Compute? Power consumption to performance ratio?) Wide open.
Dates are really irrelevent.

"and we'll see if AMD can deliver us a single GPU solution that can compete with Nvidia's own $1000 GPU."
Even they don't know. hehe.

So you truly believe that AMD can't and/or won't release a single-GPU card faster than a 7970Ghz?
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
R
avg of 30% difference is probably correct once you add a few more TWIMTBP games. for double the price. not so great. :thumbsdown: Hawaii by mid -october will put things in a different perspective.

Out of the box after-market 780s are 35-36% faster than a 7970GE. That's before taking overclocking into account. You can overclock the 7970 but 780 overclocks another 200mhz too. A lot of the games you linked to run faster on AMD hardware (i.e., 7970GE > 770 in them) but if you start looking at average performance, it's more like the difference between a 1.275Ghz 7970 and 1.3Ghz 780 is 30-35%. Did you suddenly forget that 1.275Ghz is much faster than 7970GE?

If you are going to cherry pick games like Hitman and TR where AMD's cards take full advantage of Compute/GCN optimizations, why not include games where after-market 780/Titan crush the 7970GE? It's only fair if you want a balanced comparison.

52% faster in FC3


54% faster in BF3


49% faster in RTW2
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Total...sts/Total-War-Rome-2-Test-Benchmarks-1086131/

40% faster in SR4


57% faster in XCOM


Add 200mhz more for 780 from overclocking on top of those scores! :biggrin:

9970 would need to match Titan out of the gate and have 25% overclocking headroom to match Galaxy HOF 780/EVGA Classified and similar cards. I don't see how this is possible since NV's chip is much larger, wider and overclocks like a champ.

39% faster in SC:B
 
Last edited:

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,475
136
Out of the box after-market 780s are 35-36% faster than a 7970GE. That's before taking overclocking into account. A lot of the games you linked run faster on AMD hardware (i.e., 7970GE > 770 in them) but if you start looking at average performance, it's more like the difference between a 1.275Ghz 7970 and 1.3Ghz 780 is 30-35%. Did you suddenly forget that 1.275Ghz is much faster than 7970GE?

If you are going to cherry pick games like Hitman and TR where AMD's cards take full advantage of Compute/GCN optimizations, why not include games where after-market 780/Titan crushes the 7970GE? It's only fair.

52% faster in FC3


54% faster in BF3


49% faster in RTW2

RS whatever benchmarks you posted once you compare max OC to max OC and on average the difference is 30%. we can argue for a few % here and there but still you are making up the GTX 780 to be a much bigger card than it is.

funnily enough you too seem to be cherrypicking. BF3 is 30 - 40% faster on Titan wrt HD 7970 Ghz. you show a single review with 50+%

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...Graphics-Card-Review-GK110-Mini/Battlefield-3
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_titan_review,20.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-titan-performance-review,3442-3.html
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2013/02/21/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-6gb-review/3

the other fact is for a person who was constantly talking about perf/$ being frustratingly bad at the high end your complete turnaround to constant glorification of GTX 780 is surprising. 30% perf increase for a 90 - 100% price increase. sorry thats underwhelming.

if we get 35 - 40% more perf than HD 7970 Ghz for 65% more price at say around USD 600 (assuming avg HD 7970 Ghz price of USD 360) thats much more reasonable. my guess is we will see Hawaii do that. you are welcome to disagree. :thumbsup:
 

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,475
136
9970 would need to match Titan out of the gate and have 25% overclocking headroom to match Galaxy HOF 780/EVGA Classified and similar cards. I don't see how this is possible since NV's chip is much larger, wider and overclocks like a champ.

wait a minute. you believe GK110's perf / sq mm is good. I believe its the worst. followed by Tahiti. GK110's gaming perf / sq mm is underwhelming for a 561 sq mm chip. Thats the price Nvidia had to pay for building a compute monster. When compared with GK104 the die size is 90% more. Titan has 75% more shaders than GK104. but still even at same clocks the gap is nowhere close to 50% on average. the reason is perf/cc has gone down due to a smaller front end. GK104 has 1536 cc, 8 SMX, 4 GPC, 4 raster engines. GK110 has 2880 cc, 15 SMX, 5 GPC, 5 raster engines. the ratio is of SMX to GPC to raster engines is 2:1:1 for GK104. for GK110 its 3:1:1. so you have lesser resources to feed the cc.

For AMD the reverse is happening. they are going to increase the front end resources and improve the ratio of CUs to ACE, geometry engines, raster engines compared to Tahiti. perf/sp is going up in Hawaii.

so stop believing that GK110 is a hard chip to beat at perf / sq mm. AMD can definitely match Titan at 480 sq mm with similar OC headroom. :biggrin:
 

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,601
2
81
At the same clocks the 780 is 50% faster than the 680 and it has 50% more units. Thus it scales perfectly. Titan scales a little worse. For 75% more units it's only about 68% faster at the same clocks:
http://ht4u.net/reviews/2013/55_directx11_grafikkarten_im_test/index30.php

That is pretty good, but I guess bandwidth is becoming a limiting factor. That the frontend is a limiting factor seems unplausible since the 780 scales so perfectly and Titan only has 16% more units.
 

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,475
136
At the same clocks the 780 is 50% faster than the 680 and it has 50% more units. Thus it scales perfectly. Titan scales a little worse. For 75% more units it's only about 68% faster at the same clocks:
http://ht4u.net/reviews/2013/55_directx11_grafikkarten_im_test/index30.php

That is pretty good, but I guess bandwidth is becoming a limiting factor. That the frontend is a limiting factor seems unplausible since the 780 scales so perfectly and Titan only has 16% more units.

where did you get your 50% scaling. 30% on average.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/08/14/galaxy_geforce_gtx_780_hof_edition_review/3#.UigtBH_3x8E
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013..._directcu_ii_video_card_review/4#.UigtHX_3x8E

Metro Last Light 2560 x 1600 Very High settings AAA 16xAF

HOF 780(1.3 Ghz) - 65.0 (30% faster)
ASUS GTX 770(1.3 Ghz) - 50.1

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/08/14/galaxy_geforce_gtx_780_hof_edition_review/3#.UihboH_3x8E
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013..._directcu_ii_video_card_review/7#.Uigtd3_3x8E

Farcry3 2560 X 1600 Ultra 2x MSAA

HOF 780(1.3 Ghz) - 50.2 (27% faster)
ASUS GTX 770(1.3 Ghz) - 39.4

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...ews/62594-galaxy-gtx-770-gc-4gb-review-8.html
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...s/63051-evga-gtx-780-classified-review-8.html

Crysis 3 2560 x 1600 Very High FXAA

EVGA GTX 780(1.3 Ghz) - 47.64 (25% faster)
Galaxy GTX 780(1.3 Ghz) - 37.99
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |