Seems like I suggested that above (instead of just buying a Mugen V). Naturally you can't use the Mugen HSFs you have already (without buying an adapter). But you can use the stock, unmodified. Buying yet another Mugen V might not be in your best interest either, which is what I was trying to point out. I wasn't telling you that your motherboard was going to blow up. I am telling you that even the 3700x may throttle to stay within it's TDP rating, or not if it has a bigger cooler on it. AMD is playing fast and loose with TDP ratings this gen, or so it appears. Just like Intel has been doing for awhile.
Let me be clear: none of these boards are going to damage themselves, and it's highly unlikely that they'll damage CPUs running "stock". All they do when the VRMs and/or CPU overheat is throttle. That's it.
Yes I do. You don't want to pay more than $300 for a board, and I've already acknowledged that, which is why the Ace is a bad buy. You like the layout of the Carbon, so I suggested the Ace . . . until I saw the horrid price. Sort of leaves you in a pickle.
What I'm trying to tell you is, get a 6-layer board if you can, or be prepared to make some compromises if you can't.
It was a hell of a board for its time. I remember running stupid-high HTT speeds on it. Pity Abit isn't making boards anymore. I even miss Chaintech . . . a little.
It isn't even about overclocking. It's about stock operation. Look at the 9900k: it's a 95W TDP CPU, right? Put a rinky-dink Intel cooler rated for a 95W CPU and sure enough, the 9900k will heat up and throttle back, pulling probably 95W in the process (+/- some trivial %). Put a bigger cooler on it and it will run right up there to 160W or more. Stock. Many people (including myself) made a big deal about it when the 9900k launched. I'd be remiss if I actually thought AMD should get away with something similar on Matisse. Personally I do not mind that stock configurations can do that. I think it'll be fun watching how far my 3900x can go on a 140a current limit out-of-the-box. But it's going to shock a lot of Day 1 builders who do not have a chance to read reviews before buying. It may take reviewers awhile to sort out everything too. AnandTech had to review the 9900k twice (essentially).
Anyone who does not particularly like that behavior can just disable CPB in the UEFI. Or they can modify P-states but that's complicated, and nowhere near stock.
edit: I must add that a Brasilian site has posted an early R5 3600 review. Credit goes to
@DiogoDX :
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/speculation-ryzen-3000-series.2558009/post-39863728
Here the R5 3600 is staying within its thermal envelope. Temps are spiky. I'm not sure what are the implications of that. That's in contrast to the German 3700x review that showed it drawing more power than a stock 2700x. The plot thickens. To me this makes building a Matisse system more interesting, but for others, it's probably frustrating.