Thats what I thought I remember doing on my Taichi X370 board. But on this (Phantom Gaming ITX)it still says Speed 2133 next to the XMP and Profile (where I select 3200 or even 2933) and either restarting back into the bios or from reporting in Windows it shows up as 2133 (or 1066 depending on tool).On my ASRock AB350M Pro4, the UEFI was a bit weird at first, you had to set XMP, and then ALSO select a "Profile" (or manually set DRAM clock).
I figured it would be simple if we had a couple people with newer Asrock boards, figure someone may have had same confusion as I am and figured it out. For now posting from work so I can't take any screenshots (assuming you are right and there is a way).Most modern uEFI's have screenshot capabilities. Would be nice if users with bios questions would take advantage of the feature.
I figured it would be simple if we had a couple people with newer Asrock boards, figure someone may have had same confusion as I am and figured it out. For now posting from work so I can't take any screenshots (assuming you are right and there is a way).
Ok, cool! I just picked up a Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L. It's up and running. My CPU temp is much cooler (10c) - Idles around 40c because I have the doors shut, with little AC. I forgot to mention, I took back the 120mm case fans. Those corsair ones are terribly loud, and obnoxious.I have 2 3900x's both on 240mm coolermaster AIO's
I have had email alerts on BH Photo (I think thats it) Amazon for the 3900x, and newegg since its been OOS. I just got an in stock message from Amazon, and looked, and its for $900 !!! What do they think I am crazy ?
The ASRock x470 has an update, and my ASUS x470 prime pro has an update (both to Agesa 1.0.0.3 AB) but no update for the X370.A bunch of new BIOS's dropped today for Asrock 3XX and 4XX MB's.
https://www.asrock.com/support/index.asp?cat=BIOS
Use the 5.61, its out there somewhere, somebody linked me to it.I've been checking back on my board's BIOS section regularly, though this current BIOS is not too shabby.
The previous BIOS (5.10) was AGESA 1.0.0.6 but 5.30 reads "Update AMD AGESA Combo-AM4 1.0.0.1" so I'm not sure what to make of that. Looking at the BIOS history it seems once a "Bridge BIOS" is released AGESA code gets rolled back and then incremental updates are released thereafter?
I don't really care I suppose, so long it works.
I had beta bios sent to me, and it was fine. This exact bios, I loaded on my x370 Taichi, and it was fine. With a Ryzen 1600 just to flash bios, but it was fine.This one?
Bit hesitant to use a beta BIOS that support sent directly to some random individual though
OK, I downloaded it for my ASUS and ASRock boards for mt 3900x's. Dor ASRock, I set it to 3600.1800 and I got a bppt and timings were right. Subtimings must be off, since my latency is 80ns. On the ASUS board I ad to swap memory, and manually set the timings to 16,15,15,15,36. I have spent all afternoon on this. I give up.I've been checking back on my board's BIOS section regularly, though this current BIOS is not too shabby.
The previous BIOS (5.10) was AGESA 1.0.0.6 but 5.30 reads "Update AMD AGESA Combo-AM4 1.0.0.1" so I'm not sure what to make of that. Looking at the BIOS history it seems once a "Bridge BIOS" is released AGESA code gets rolled back and then incremental updates are released thereafter?
I don't really care I suppose, so long it works.
Can I see your subtimings in Ryzen Master?
64 ns is exceedingly difficult. The best I have gotten is one-time 64.8 ns, which I have not reproduced since. Sub-70 ns is doable with 3200/CL14 or 3600/CL16, at fclk 1800 or above.
That is highly unlikely. PBO will jack up the power parameters to motherboard limits (and beyond) and the CPU will try to eat whatever it thinks it can digest. Check the PPT, TDC, and EDC numbers in Ryzen Master when PBO is enabled, and have HWinfo run side by side while running Prime95. You will see power consumption differences with and without PBO.So experience wise PBO was on to begin with. Package wise it was wierd and maybe the reporting was off. But it seemed to use less power with PBO on then off. I ran Prime95 to stress the CPU, when PBO was on it ran at 4100 per core for about half a minute then settled down to 3980-4GHz. With it running at 95c on my H100i. With PBO off it settled at 3910 and dipped to 3880 a few times. No throttling. But full package showed up at 95% of 140w limit. I don't remember what the number was with PBO but it wasn't redlining against the 140w. But I think that wasn't reporting it correctly.
3900x. Like I said a misreport. I don't see how I could be thermally limited on PBO and not without but have it using more power. But that was how it was being reported.That is highly unlikely. PBO will jack up the power parameters to motherboard limits (and beyond) and the CPU will try to eat whatever it thinks it can digest. Check the PPT, TDC, and EDC numbers in Ryzen Master when PBO is enabled, and have HWinfo run side by side while running Prime95. You will see power consumption differences with and without PBO.
Edit: Are we talking about 3600/3700, or 3900?
I tried using the Ryzen dram calculator on the ASUS board, but even using "safe" settings, it would not even boot. So I give up
Its 3600 cl15 ram, samsung b-die. I put it in and set the speed to 3600, but aida64 says my memory speed is 51k, and latency, 80 ! Lopri (and others) get 55-56k and 64 or so latency. Thats a big difference. So I use that Ryzen dram calculator, select "calculate safe" and put those timings in. It won't even post. I have to reset CMOS.Is the issue getting it up to speed or just the timings?
When I was playing around with a ASUS CH6 MB to get my 3200MHz CL14 b-die up to 3600MHz I had to increase the dram voltage to 1.44v's. My hurdle was there is another dram voltage setting in the uEFI that I believe was called vboot dram voltage. Once I set it to the same as the dram voltage I was good to go. I believe the setting is located in External Digi+ Power Control section and was located at the very bottom of the options.