I still don't really get you. Sure, the 2200G has a 30$ higher price point but in both combinations with or without dGPU it is offers so much more power that cheaping out on the CPU to save 30$ would be dumb. With cheap and powerful quadcore CPUs like the 2200G or the i3-8100 recommending an A8-9600 or G4600 seems like bad advice to you customers.
The main selling point for you should be that the 2200G can later (1-4 years) be upgraded with a midrange GPU and it will not hold that GPU back, but the A8-9600 or G4600 would. Also 4 cores will become the minimum requirement for CPU hungry games in the future. Sure you can offer them an A8-9600 or G4600 build if they really can't afford that 30$ - but saving two more months would be the best advice you could give to them. If you have trouble selling AMD CPUs because customers prefer Intel - just tell them about Meltdown.
I dont do sales, i just watch over the competition and build pc configurations, along with other internal stuff.
I need to think it like this: The 2200G build is probably going to cost the exact same money as a A12-9800 build right? the 9700/9800 sales are very very low, old A10-78xx where also not very high either.
Im giving the example of the G4600/4GB/1050 because its the cheaper one, but there is also R3 1200, R5 1400, I3-7100 with the 1050 and with 8 or 4GB of ram, and except for the R5 1400, any of those combinations sells more than the 9700/9800. And i just waiting for the H310 to replace the 7100s.
I just dont see how the 2200G can change that in any way, 1030 level IGP (if that, its going to be very difficult) is just not enoght. And im taking in consideration that people will know of the 2200G igp power (they will not).
I could be good to replace a GT1030 gaming configuration, but i dont have one, i use the 1050 as the more basic entry level GPU for games and i dont think anyone will argue with me that.
The 7300/9500 is the choice for a basic entry level, general use PC, with the Pentium following close by, and the A8-9600 is the choice for a pc to run basic entry level games and it sells quite well. And 9700/9800 are niches. Its really strange, people seems to think if they had to expend more money they rather jump to a 1050, and i dont blame them.
I could get rid of the 9600 and put a 2200G on it, the thing is, im not going to do this, because people is going to buy a 9600 in other place, its the reason of why i was forced intro building 4GB versions of EVERYTHING, i did not wanted to, but the competition did, and they sold well, so i had to do it, and it sells well. So i can do nothing.
BUT. the 2200G and 2400G could be VERY GOOD as R3 1200 / R5 1400 non-gaming build replacement, those "office" configurations have, right now a GT710 on them, i could easily replace the 1200 and 1400 for the APU version and get rid of the GT710. That will greatly help to keep the Ryzen configurations competitive when the H310 w/ 8100 / 8400 drops by.