Peter Watts
Member
- Jan 11, 2018
- 60
- 15
- 41
I think the whole discussion started when someone suggested that single channel 8gig is perfectly fine for a system with a dGPU but if you had 8 gig dual channel with the APU (2200-2400) It wouldn't be sufficient. Now people are saying if you want to run all kinds of background apps and have 10's of tabs open with God knows what else going on it won't be enough.First of all, explain me if your maximum memory usage is e.g. 4GB why there would be any performance difference between systems with 8, 16 or 32GB of RAM?
Given that all of the configurations are otherwise identical?
Remember the "oil crisis"? You might not have been around or aware back then. But FWIW we were supposed to have run out of oil years ago. Fake news was not a Trump invention.Do you have information which shows that the major DRAM manufacturers are running their fabs below the full capacity?
Because otherwise there wouldn't be anything which would indicate illegal price fixings between the manufacturers.
There is no point in investing more into additional manufacturing capacity for processes which are already being phased out. Instead the manufacturers will invest into new processes which already are or will be coming online shortly.
I have the same experience, it keeping crashing on win7 no matter what...Ok, back into the Windows 7 situation.
I tried a win7 image that worked fine with Ryzen 1000 series (Ryzen 5 1600X on Gigabyte GA-AB350 Gaming 3)
I flashed the BIOS to F20, then booted into windows once BEFORE a processor swap.
SATA mode still set to AHCI. SSD connected to a SATA coming off the chipset. SATA driver set to AMD SATA
Swapped the 1600x for a 2200g. Restart.
Windows 7 crashed.
Restarted and crashed again.
Kept crashing every single time.
Changed the drive to a SATA port coming off the CPU. Same results, crash.
Tried that on my own PC, Asus Prime X370 Pro, put a 2400G in that PC.
Same result
Crash after crash.
So, something is different with these APUs.
Error code 0x000000A5 "BIOS is not fully ACPI compliant"
To make it even more frustrating, my own windows 10 install (16299.248) crashed twice before making it into windows.
Once in windows, installing the RV drivers showed in adrenalin installer as 17.7!
Its impossible to get proof for this issue, one way or the other.
But let me ask you something, why Vega was delayed this much?
Why Amd has for the first time expended a year whiout a high end dgpu? You are sure it had nothing to do with ps4 pro and its "4k gaming" ? because im not so sure.
Look the original contract with Sony and MS was signed when AMD was in a very bad shape, we cant know exactly what it includes, AMD could had accepted petty much everything, and you had to admit what happened to Vega was strange AMD had nothing to counter 1070 and 1080 for a long, long time, right at the moment the PS4 PRO with 4K was coming out...
And now this whole deal with Intel, the KBL-G, to me it looks like an attempt to work around something.
Maybe it will be like Vega, and that APU you are talking about will launch, once is not a threat to consoles profit.
How many of those issues are AMD-specific and not due to the MSI motherboard itself? In one of the comments the question is asked-I have the same experience, it keeping crashing on win7 no matter what...
Looks like the chip suffer from considerable more teething problems, even on win10: bsod, file corruption,some board having bios issues, immature drivers, looks like typical AMD new product launch....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_te-ksbGXE
To which they answer-I didn't quite get it why Raven Ridge would cause BSODs with WLAN drivers? Where is the logical connection between these components?
It's the MSI B350I motherboard that's responsible for that, in part, at least.
I have the same experience, it keeping crashing on win7 no matter what...
Looks like the chip suffer from considerable more teething problems, even on win10: bsod, file corruption,some board having bios issues, immature drivers, looks like typical AMD new product launch....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_te-ksbGXE
FWIW, the RR / Vega 8/11 APU drivers, ONLY work with Windows 10 1709. The RX VEGA drivers for Windows 7, apparently cause crashes and BSODs when used with the APU.
And mobo vendor BIOS / UEFI immaturity is really, sadly, nothing new to AMD product launches, because the mobo vendors have traditionally devoted less engineering resources to their AMD platforms. Hopefully with the success of the Zen-family CPUs and APUs, this will change.
What happens for Win7 when you do a completely fresh install with slipstreamed xHCI + NVM drivers, ie, not use any "image"? That ACPI error message does sound a little weird and suggests some deeper changes than just adding APU support. Also, what happens if you try booting into "Safe Mode"?Windows 7 crashed. Restarted and crashed again. Kept crashing every single time. Changed the drive to a SATA port coming off the CPU. Same results, crash. Tried that on my own PC, Asus Prime X370 Pro, put a 2400G in that PC. Same result. Crash after crash. So, something is different with these APUs. Error code 0x000000A5 "BIOS is not fully ACPI compliant"
I'd have expected the same thing with booting APU's for the first time as what you get with inserting a dGPU without loading the driver (it'll boot fine, you can use in it "VESA compatibility mode", but there wouldn't be any 2D/3D acceleration until you installed the driver then rebooted). You're right that for it to crash before loading any drivers is obviously not a case of loading the "wrong" ones.I have the same experience, it keeping crashing on win7 no matter what...
No, it has nothing to do with RX Vega drivers on win 7 because you will not load CPU on windows 7, before you even try instal gpu drivers... Technically there is not reason why you couldn't use RR on win 7 if Ryzen CPU working normally.
Performance in games won't be affected whether you have 8 GB of total RAM vs 16 GB.
Remember the "oil crisis"? You might not have been around or aware back then. But FWIW we were supposed to have run out of oil years ago. Fake news was not a Trump invention.
What happens for Win7 when you do a completely fresh install with slipstreamed xHCI + NVM drivers, ie, not use any "image"? That ACPI error message does sound a little weird and suggests some deeper changes than just adding APU support. Also, what happens if you try booting into "Safe Mode"?
What happens for Win7 when you do a completely fresh install with slipstreamed xHCI + NVM drivers, ie, not use any "image"? That ACPI error message does sound a little weird and suggests some deeper changes than just adding APU support. Also, what happens if you try booting into "Safe Mode"?
I'd have expected the same thing with booting APU's for the first time as what you get with inserting a dGPU without loading the driver (it'll boot fine, you can use in it "VESA compatibility mode", but there wouldn't be any 2D/3D acceleration until you installed the driver then rebooted). You're right that for it to crash before loading any drivers is obviously not a case of loading the "wrong" ones.
Have either of you two tried, eg, Linux Mint? (You don't have to install Linux to HDD, just see if it boots as a "LiveCD"?)
Given that it's occured on multiple boards & brands (Asus, Gigabyte, MSI, etc), at this point I don't know what else to suggest other than insert a dGPU, try disabling the iGPU in the BIOS then see if the 2200G / 2400G's installs W7 fresh (not boot to a previous image) as a pure CPU. If even that doesn't work, then there's definitely something else going on regarding the BIOS updates required for these chips vs the fact all the other Ryzen CPU's (1300X / 1500X, etc), worked perfectly fine in Windows 7 on the same boards with earlier BIOS versions.It could be ACPI related issue, because right before it crashed,there was for a half second blue screen with note "this system is not ACPI compliant , please contact your vendor to update your bios setting"
0x00000A5
At this point I'm sure it wouldn't work due to Linux Mint being on the 4.13.x kernel, while you will need 4.15.x for Raven Ridge to work. The latest Manjaro Linux ISOs might work. The best thing to do is wait until the 4.16.x kernels and Mesa 18.x have been released first before trying Linux.Have either of you two tried, eg, Linux Mint? (You don't have to install Linux to HDD, just see if it boots as a "LiveCD"?)
Off topic, but so wrong on every level. I *was* around back then, and nobody said we "ran out of oil". OPEC cut production and decreased exports for political/economic reasons. As for "fake news" Trump may not have invented it, but he most definitely perfected the tactic of using the term to discredit legitimate information. (End of my comments on this.)Remember the "oil crisis"? You might not have been around or aware back then. But FWIW we were supposed to have run out of oil years ago. Fake news was not a Trump invention.
There was the Political oil crisis of the 1970s and the later fear mongering predicted oil crisis by extreme environmentalists claiming that we were at, or past peak oil, and that soon oil would be scarce, meaning now.Off topic, but so wrong on every level. I *was* around back then, and nobody said we "ran out of oil". OPEC cut production and decreased exports for political/economic reasons. As for "fake news" Trump may not have invented it, but he most definitely perfected the tactic of using the term to discredit legitimate information. (End of my comments on this.)
Description:
Supports Windows® 7/10 for
7th-Gen AMD A-Series Processors
AMD Ryzen™ Desktop Processor
AMD X370 Chipset
AMD B350 Chipset
AMD A320 Chipset
Windows® 10 only for
AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ Processor
AMD Ryzen™ Desktop Processor with Radeon™ Vega Graphics
AMD X399 Chipset
Package Includes:
AMD Chipset Drivers
AMD Ryzen™ Balanced Power Plan
Because Semi-Custom business is to some degree separate from Graphics, CPU and GPU businesses in AMD.
It USES AMD technology, and IP, for custom purposes: Consoles, Intel request. But it will never stop and never will impact AMD business, in any way, than by sucking Engineers, and their time and effort from GPU and CPU divisions. This is only impact Semi-Custom business front can have on AMD own CPU and GPU business.
But in the end its still a contract between Sony and AMD, not sure why you belive the contract cant "ask" something out of AMD just because the semi custom unit is another division.
Also its Sony!! They do exactly this stuff with the software houses, not allowing them to release the game for PC, some time as time exclusive, in others forever! Or do you belive some of the software houses dont want to make money out of the PC market?
I expect the worse out of Sony, and back on the moment AMD could have accepted anything.