With the latest Asus X370 pro bios I can get my RAM to 2666 now. Pretty nice. Still far aways from 3400. My memory latency is still only 88ns. Why is it so bad still?
With the latest Asus X370 pro bios I can get my RAM to 2666 now. Pretty nice. Still far aways from 3400. My memory latency is still only 88ns. Why is it so bad still?
What timings?
PCGamesHardware has lots of results with single rank vs. dual rank memory:Never thought about the matter before at all, sounds stupid but it is what it is.
Now i assume it's mostly about more open pages with dual rank or 2 DIMMs per channel- better chance for a hit. Guess interleaved accesses can boost perf too, assuming that's being done.
There should be some extra complication for the memory controller with dual rank (or 2 DIMMs per chan) but manageable.
Mentioned AIDA because folks look at BW and latency and often that's it. Here's an example, a review that tests with AIDA and nothing more http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-ryzen-single-rank-versus-dual-rank-ddr4-memory-performance_192960
And in this case, the benchmark fails to expose the real world differences so it becomes useless for this particular purpose.
The perf gaps must be investigated and quantified. HardwareFR gets pretty large differences , more than enough to impact purchasing decisions.
For those that don't speak german, can you summarize ?PCGamesHardware has lots of results with single rank vs. dual rank memory:
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-5-1600X-CPU-265842/Tests/R5-1500X-Review-Mainstream-1225280/3/
For those that don't speak german, can you summarize ?
Are you using Netscape from the 90's?For those that don't speak german, can you summarize ?
Probably the same reason why SSDs with more chips in them perform better than the same models with fewer chips.I think the interesting part is dual rank is aprox 6% better for gaming (min fps) vs single rank at 2667. Double the effect of going from 2667 to 3200 (3.1% better min). If i understand it correctly. Why is that so?
Can we see that in aida64 in bandwith?Probably the same reason why SSDs with more chips in them perform better than the same models with fewer chips.
More parallelized access. Instead of asking 1 chip for X number of bytes, you're asking two chips for X number of bytes likely split between them?
Ryzen Master itself still uses 6 - 7% CPU on its own, which pretty bad IMO.
Seems to report correct temperature on X chips now. I'm seeing about 62C now running Prime95 Small FFT.
Ahh so don't keep it running? I don't. I've got other programs to do far more detailed monitoring and they report the correct temperature.
PRIME B350-PLUS BIOS 0606
Update AGESA to 1.0.0.4a
PRIME B350-PLUS BIOS 0605
Beta BIOS for AGESA 1004A
PRIME B350-PLUS BIOS 0515
1.Improve system stability.
2.Enhance memory compatibility
3.Improve CPU temperature monitor function
Exactly, i ran ryzen master for a few hours then decided it was POS crap software and uninstalled. I can run 10 other monitoring programs at the same time and take up half as much or less CPU time. Whoever wrote this program should be ashamed of themselves.
Firefox from 2017.Are you using Netscape from the 90's?
I think he is asking because Firefox should ask you when you go to the page if you want it translated.Firefox from 2017.
Chrome has a built-in translator, works very well.Firefox from 2017.
Exactly, i ran ryzen master for a few hours then decided it was POS crap software and uninstalled. I can run 10 other monitoring programs at the same time and take up half as much or less CPU time. Whoever wrote this program should be ashamed of themselves.