AMD RYZEN Builders Thread

Page 157 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Reinvented

Senior member
Oct 5, 2005
489
77
91
I have a couple of cases that I enjoy very much for small builds and large builds. Unfortunately they are the Corsair 350D, and the Corsair 460X RGB. I thoroughly enjoy them really nice closed and compact, even with water cooling.
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
For the near future anyway, I need a Blu-ray burner. I'd like to get rid of needing that at some point.
Get an external case for it now that you're changing cases, and stow the drive away once you stop needing it. Easy. That way you can pull it out occasionally if you need too without any hassle. Waiting just sticks you with an unnecessarily large case with features you don't actually want.
 

UsandThem

Elite Member
May 4, 2000
16,068
7,380
146
For the near future anyway, I need a Blu-ray burner. I'd like to get rid of needing that at some point.

One nice thing about having 5.25" bays (even if you don't have an optical drive) is using it to mount your SSD or hard drives. The R5 has two trays to mount 2.5" drives behind the motherboard, but there is not much air that gets back there (all cases). So my SSDs were running about 10c higher than they normally do. I don't like having my hard drive cages in there because they block airflow, so I bought one of these to mount my drives:

https://smile.amazon.com/ICY-DOCK-B...id=1496414473&sr=1-1&keywords=Quattro+MB344SP

So I have that in one spot, and I still use a DVD drive in the other (I buy a lot of used music CDs to rip onto my PC).

http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/6834/fractal-design-define-r5-mid-tower-chassis-review/index.html
 

EXCellR8

Diamond Member
Sep 1, 2010
3,982
839
136
^used an ICY trio with a case that I had to remove the HDD cage... fits 2x 2.5" drives and one 3.5"

only thing i don't like about it is the front slider thing... but the case has a door that covers all the bays so it's fine
 
Reactions: UsandThem

Insert_Nickname

Diamond Member
May 6, 2012
4,971
1,693
136
One nice thing about having 5.25" bays (even if you don't have an optical drive) is using it to mount your SSD or hard drives.

Exactly. 5.25" bays aren't just for ODDs, as some would have you believe. There are plenty of other applications (hot-swap bays, extra front USB ports, card readers f.x.). They're not critical anymore, but they're still nice to have in some situations.
 
Reactions: UsandThem

Space Tyrant

Member
Feb 14, 2017
149
115
116
Well, part of the problem is, my case is in a cubby in / under a desk. So it doesn't get good airflow. I think that's the real issue, and there's no rear exhaust fan, so not much air movement over the VRMs (which ARE heatsinked, but they still need airflow).

Larry, your situation sound a *lot* like mine.

I'm running a 1600 on the Asrock AB350M Pro4 with the Wrath Spire in the cubby on my desk. I'm not seeing anywhere near the temps you're getting. The highest I saw after 25 minutes of my most stressful benchmark was 62C -- when running at 3.9GHz @ 1.35V.

My guess is that you just need a better source of cool air and need to close off any vents that would short-circuit that.

I started out with higher temps as well, I removed the door from my desk cubby so that it is open from the front. I also took out the push/pull 120mm fans that came with my case (Fractal Design Define C Mini) and installed two 140mm fans to pull air in from the front, the *only* source of cool air in my, uh, case. Those fans are downvolted to turn at 600-670RPM, btw, and are the only case fans installed. During the 62C test, they were spinning at 550, I believe.

I also covered the bottom and top vents in my case to force all air out the back, passing over the cpu and my gpu. The gpu is a 750 TI, but I've also tested with an Asus 970 Strix and only saw a single degree of difference, iirc.
 

NesuD

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,999
106
106
So, a few notes for prospective first-time (or first time in ten years, as me) water cooling builders:

  • Don't go anywhere near a Fractal Define R4. I would like to send a sincere f*ck you to the design team behind that case. "Front 240mm radiator support" my rear end. Sure, if you're willing and able to mangle the front fan mount entirely, and spend 20 minutes fiddling to make the screws connect. And don't get me started with the top mount that I guess could fit either a radiator or a set of fans (even though it is offset!) Great job, Fractal. Yes, I know it's an old design. I timed my purchase perfectly - just a couple of months before the R5 launched. *pats self on back* (Oh, did you say mangled fan mount? Yes. Watch your fingers.
    And that was me being extra careful.
  • If your radiator mount is fiddly, give yourself enough slack in the tubing to move stuff around, for example to set the fans to pull rather than push.
  • Check that the fans spin freely before connecting everything and filling the loop. Saves you a lot of annoying rat-tat-tat noises and a couple of hours of involuntary case modding.

Other than that, I'm very happy with my build. The increase in general speed from the previous CPU is rather remarkable. Haven't been able to run many benchmarks yet, but I expect everything to go smoothly.

I see what happened there. you had a radiator that didn't space the fans for the way the fan placement is configured in the R4. It was a known issue back in the day. I mounted a Kraken x60 in mine. fit perfectly. Just gave it away to a friend and built a new Ryzen using the R5 and a Corsair h110i easy peasy. With the R4 you had to be a lot pickier on the aio you used to get the fans to line up properly.
 

Rifter

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,522
751
126
I would probably recommend that too. Or the Define S (ATX) or C (mATX) if you don't need 5.25" bays. As I've said, the R4 is reportedly quieter. But not by much, and everything else that I have pointed out should be drastically better.

Yeah my Build is in a Define S and it is by far the best and most easy to use case i have built a PC in ever. Love it, FD likely earned me as a customer for life with this case.
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
I see what happened there. you had a radiator that didn't space the fans for the way the fan placement is configured in the R4. It was a known issue back in the day. I mounted a Kraken x60 in mine. fit perfectly. Just gave it away to a friend and built a new Ryzen using the R5 and a Corsair h110i easy peasy. With the R4 you had to be a lot pickier on the aio you used to get the fans to line up properly.
My rad is mounted exactly as Fractal shows it in their explainer video. Now, I find it rather odd to mount a radiator to a somewhat flimsy plastic insert in the first place, but fair enough. Only being able to use six out of eight screws is far worse. But my main issue was clearance for the fans. Apparently, the plastic was slightly warped inwards, and Nidec Gentle Typhoons are rather big fans, getting very close to the edge of the frame, leading to them making contact with the plastic fan grille, especially at higher fan speeds. That's why you don't make a fan grille out of flat plastic in the first place, especially one that you have to screw high-tension screws into a heavy copper radiator through. It's no wonder it warped. I'd call it inevitable. Luckily, cutting it away didn't necessitate further mangling of the fan mount holes I was actually using, at least.

Also, as the fan grille is made for 2 140mm fans, are there any 240mm rads that fit both the 120mm mount holes? I can't quite imagine that.
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
I saw a news post saying that board should be "identical, feature-wise" to the Intel counterpart. I assume that would apply to VRMs too, no? Anyhow, good to see the AM4 lineups fleshing out.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,554
10,171
126
I managed to get a stable 3.80Ghz on my 1600, at 1.3250V (CPU-Z reports 1.360V). I mounted a 120mm fan as an exhaust at the top of the case, so it's only getting up to 88C package temp.

Though, I'm still not certain if it's throttling. The CPU graphs in Task Manager aren't all as "full".

Edit: Ugh. Black-screen, when switching tabs with YouTube videos running.

So now I'm trying 1.3500V.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Drazick

NesuD

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,999
106
106
The R4 only really works with a 240mm rad setup. You can make the smaller rad work with it but the case was never really designed with AIOs in mind. Getting my X60 in there was far more work than it should have been if the case were actually designed for it.
My rad is mounted exactly as Fractal shows it in their explainer video. Now, I find it rather odd to mount a radiator to a somewhat flimsy plastic insert in the first place, but fair enough. Only being able to use six out of eight screws is far worse. But my main issue was clearance for the fans. Apparently, the plastic was slightly warped inwards, and Nidec Gentle Typhoons are rather big fans, getting very close to the edge of the frame, leading to them making contact with the plastic fan grille, especially at higher fan speeds. That's why you don't make a fan grille out of flat plastic in the first place, especially one that you have to screw high-tension screws into a heavy copper radiator through. It's no wonder it warped. I'd call it inevitable. Luckily, cutting it away didn't necessitate further mangling of the fan mount holes I was actually using, at least.

Also, as the fan grille is made for 2 140mm fans, are there any 240mm rads that fit both the 120mm mount holes? I can't quite imagine that.

The R4 only really works with certain 240mm AIOs. You can make the smaller rad work with it but the case was never really designed with AIOs in mind no matter what Fractal Design says. AIOs were just starting to become popular when the R4 first came out. The problem was that the fan spacing in that case was not the same as most AIOs so getting everything to line up cleanly was pretty impossible. Even the spacing for a 240 setup was different than most. The NZXT x60 was one of the few AIOs that had a compatible fan spacing with the R4. Fortunately they cured most of the more serious Rad and fan alignment issues with the R5.
 
Reactions: scannall

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
I managed to get a stable 3.80Ghz on my 1600, at 1.3250V (CPU-Z reports 1.360V). I mounted a 120mm fan as an exhaust at the top of the case, so it's only getting up to 88C package temp.

Though, I'm still not certain if it's throttling. The CPU graphs in Task Manager aren't all as "full".

Edit: Ugh. Black-screen, when switching tabs with YouTube videos running.

So now I'm trying 1.3500V.
1.375 is perfectly safe also. No problem.
 

Reinvented

Senior member
Oct 5, 2005
489
77
91
I managed to get a stable 3.80Ghz on my 1600, at 1.3250V (CPU-Z reports 1.360V). I mounted a 120mm fan as an exhaust at the top of the case, so it's only getting up to 88C package temp.

Though, I'm still not certain if it's throttling. The CPU graphs in Task Manager aren't all as "full".

Edit: Ugh. Black-screen, when switching tabs with YouTube videos running.

So now I'm trying 1.3500V.
What board are you using? Need to make sure you use LLC if it's available too.
 

Azuma Hazuki

Golden Member
Jun 18, 2012
1,532
866
131
I did a build with an R7-1700 inside a Silverstone TJ08-E for a customer recently. That big fan in front and the Spire cooler in back are more than enough to keep things nice and cool in there. Really, I'm amazed and slightly frightened at what this chip does in 65W TDP...
 

Reinvented

Senior member
Oct 5, 2005
489
77
91
I would kinda-sorta expect those kinds of features to be limited to X370. There has to be some differentiation, no?

No, because the B350 and X370 are marketed as Overclocking chipsets. I have it on my MSI B350M Gaming Pro as well as my X370 Taichi.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,031
11,615
136
Now I am running UEFI rev 2.36 on my X370 Taichi + 1800x. I was forced to throw out all my old memory timings since the UEFI configs I saved to USB were declared corrupt. Oh the joy of BETA BIOSes!

I have removed the 3466.bin file from my dropbox account, so the link earlier in the thread is now broken. Sorry! The file is no longer relevant.

Also, my method of using Ryzen Master to set a baseline for DDR4-3200 has also failed. Ryzen Master - the latest version - has stopped playing along so well with my board when it comes to setting memory speed/timings. So I now have to tune by hand. I chose the UEFI defaults for DDR4-2133, altered primaries, and booted it all the way to DDR4-3333 without difficulty (completes y-cruncher 2g without crashing or other undesirable behavior). Here are my timings for DDR4-3333:

Code:
tCL 14
tRCDRD 14
tRCDWR 14
tRP 14
tRAS 28
tRC 50
tRRD_S 4
tRRD_L 6
tFAW 23
tWTR_S 3
tWTR_L 8
tWR 16
tMAW.MAC 0
TrdrdScL 3
TwrwrScL 3
tRFC 312
tRFC2 192
tRFC4 132
tCWL  12
tRTP 8
Trdwr 8
Twrrd 1
TwrwrSc 1
TwrwrSd 6
TwrwrDd 6
TrdrdSc 1
TrdrdSd 4
TrdrdDd 4
tCKE 6
ProcODT Auto

I can edit later with voltages but the main ones are 1.4v vcore LLC level 3, 1.175v SoC LLC level 3, 1.42v vDIMM. Testing DDR4-3466 with these timings under 2.36, but I'm not done with that yet.
 

Reinvented

Senior member
Oct 5, 2005
489
77
91
Now I am running UEFI rev 2.36 on my X370 Taichi + 1800x. I was forced to throw out all my old memory timings since the UEFI configs I saved to USB were declared corrupt. Oh the joy of BETA BIOSes!

I have removed the 3466.bin file from my dropbox account, so the link earlier in the thread is now broken. Sorry! The file is no longer relevant.

Also, my method of using Ryzen Master to set a baseline for DDR4-3200 has also failed. Ryzen Master - the latest version - has stopped playing along so well with my board when it comes to setting memory speed/timings. So I now have to tune by hand. I chose the UEFI defaults for DDR4-2133, altered primaries, and booted it all the way to DDR4-3333 without difficulty (completes y-cruncher 2g without crashing or other undesirable behavior). Here are my timings for DDR4-3333:

Code:
tCL 14
tRCDRD 14
tRCDWR 14
tRP 14
tRAS 28
tRC 50
tRRD_S 4
tRRD_L 6
tFAW 23
tWTR_S 3
tWTR_L 8
tWR 16
tMAW.MAC 0
TrdrdScL 3
TwrwrScL 3
tRFC 312
tRFC2 192
tRFC4 132
tCWL  12
tRTP 8
Trdwr 8
Twrrd 1
TwrwrSc 1
TwrwrSd 6
TwrwrDd 6
TrdrdSc 1
TrdrdSd 4
TrdrdDd 4
tCKE 6
ProcODT Auto

I can edit later with voltages but the main ones are 1.4v vcore LLC level 3, 1.175v SoC LLC level 3, 1.42v vDIMM. Testing DDR4-3466 with these timings under 2.36, but I'm not done with that yet.

Thanks. I suggest not using Ryzen Master as any boards that support bclk, it sorta screws with how it reads the current clock speeds, timings, and even voltages. I need to do some more tweaking and see how my 1700 can be pushed. I'm hoping for another 4 GHz chip at roughly 1.3-ish.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,031
11,615
136
Thanks. I suggest not using Ryzen Master as any boards that support bclk, it sorta screws with how it reads the current clock speeds, timings, and even voltages.

It worked well with earlier UEFI revisions on the X370 Taichi. In fact, it was the only way I could consistently get DDR4-3200 before UEFI rev 2.34. With 2.34 it still worked, but now it just doesn't behave very well. It'll work for one boot, then cause boot looping followed by defaulting to DDR4-2133. It isn't really worth it to use it anymore anyway now with the latest UEFI revs that permit "shotgunning" in the UEFI (setting all timings + speed at once) which used to cause crashing on my board, as well as for some others (chew* reported this awhile back).

On the plus side I got DDR4-3466 to work with the above timings/volts, which is pretty awesome! DDR4-3600 wouldn't even boot though, so . . . more work ahead for that.
 
Reactions: richierich1212
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |