AMD RYZEN Builders Thread

Page 167 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Space Tyrant

Member
Feb 14, 2017
149
115
116
Yep as long as I leave VID at stock everything works. I'm also only adjusting P0 frequency.
Ok, almost the exact situation as mine. However, I did raise the clock on P1 from 2800 to 3200, simply because the unchangeable 1.05 voltage left a lot of wasted headroom.
 

Space Tyrant

Member
Feb 14, 2017
149
115
116
Isn't the point of P1 to downclock and reduce power/wear on the CPU?
Yes, but if you can't lower the voltage, why not make the most of it? Raising the clock doesn't incur the costs of raising the voltage -- and it increases the situations where P0 isn't needed. So, having a higher P1 (without a high voltage) decreases the use of (the high-voltage) P0 and therefore reduces power/heat/wear on the CPU overall.
 
Reactions: Malogeek

Malogeek

Golden Member
Mar 5, 2017
1,390
778
136
yaktribe.org
Yes, but if you can't lower the voltage, why not make the most of it? Raising the clock doesn't incur the costs of raising the voltage -- and it increases the situations where P0 isn't needed. So, having a higher P1 (without a high voltage) decreases the use of (the high-voltage) P0 and therefore reduces power/heat/wear on the CPU overall.
Good point, makes sense. Thankfully the ZenStates program allows me to change the voltage as well.
 
Reactions: Drazick

IRobot23

Senior member
Jul 3, 2017
601
183
76
I got it.
C6H has a scratch... what to do? RMA? I need PC now...

DDR4 running at rated 3466MHz, samsund E-die 2x4 GB (20nm)

Will post more when I will have time.
 

funks

Golden Member
Nov 9, 2000
1,402
44
91
Ashes of Singularity - Escalation (v2.3 latest) - when SMT mode is enabled in the BIOS, the DX12 benchmark crashes to the desktop (after running for a bit), DX11 mode is unaffected. If I disable SMT mode on the BIOS, the DX12 benchmark completes just fine without issues.

System Configuration:

Motherboard: Asrock Taichi X370 (with V2.4 UEFI) - also happened on my Gigabyte AB350-GAMING 3. CPU: RYZEN 1700X Memory: 32GB DDR4 (2133 MT/s) GPU: EVGA GTX1080TI (also happens on GTX1070 FE) Driver: 384.76 OS: Windows 10 x64 (OS BUILD 15063.413) - running AMD Chipset 17.10 drivers and the Ryzen Balanced Power Plan

Steps to Reproduce:

1) Execute Ashes of Singularity - Escalation
2) In Video Settings, make sure it's using DX12 mode then Restart
3) Try running the built-in benchmark using "GPU Focus" Scenario. Make sure it says DX12 model, and that 16 logical processors are listed in the CPU section.
4) Run benchmark.

Expected Behavior:

Benchmark Completes

Actual Behavior:

Application Crashes to Desktop consistently when SMT is enabled.

Additional Observations:

Cleanly installed windows, ran Intel Burn Test, Memtest86, Prime95 stress test for 8 hours without any issues. Tried both Gigabyte AB350 Gaming 3, and my current board (after clean reinstall) but the problem keeps occurring when SMT mode is enabled.

Any ideas?
 
Last edited:

Despoiler

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2007
1,967
772
136
For P-State overclocking you only adjust the frequency on P0.

To adjust the voltage do not change the VID. Use the "normal" voltage offsets. Each board is different in what they call it, but you should have an "override" which will run the full voltage value all the time. Use this option to find your max stable overclock voltage. You should also have an "adaptive" option. Once you've found your max stable OC voltage with override you change the adaptive value to the override offset value.
 
Reactions: Drazick

Gideon

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2007
1,769
4,122
136
The rig itself will be:
  • CPU: Ryzen 1700X
  • Cooling: Noctua NH-U12S SE-AM4
  • Mobo: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK
  • GPU: Recycled MSI 970 GTX (was hoping to replace it with vega, will see ...)
  • Mem: DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) 3200MHz CL16 1.35V (CMK16GX4M2B3200C16R)
  • SSD: SAMSUNG 960 EVO NVMe M.2 500GB
  • PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2 650W, 80 PLUS Platinum
  • Case: Fractal Design Define S
Well, I set up the rig on saturday, only to find out that my video card was dead. Only got it replaced today with a temporary 770GTX.

Other than the ludicrous post-time of the mobo, it works very well. Memory OC was tons easier than I was afraid of. Got 2933 MHz with the ancient bios, as soon as I enabled the XMP profile. Once I updated to AGESA 1.0.0.6 the XMP profile 2 just worked and gave me the rated 3200 MHz on auto! (didn't even try profile 1, no need )

On the CPU side, I played around but finally settled on 3800 MHz with everything on auto (with cool-and-quite enabled), as this is the most hassle-free and works well on pretty much stock voltage.

Withe the new BIOS it goes as low as 0.680v on idle. Normal benchmarks get it to 1.360v while Prime95 (large FFT torture test) goes up to 1.376v. The temps are ~65°C on full load in bencmarks (unless running a power-virus like Prime small FFT test, where it can go over 80°) In gaming workloads (Witcher III so far), they are about ~45°C.

I might manage to undervolt it a bit better manually, but already this seems quite ok for a 1700X, right?

I'm very very impressed with the CPU so far! Though the ecosystem itself is still a bit rough ... for instance, a buddy of mine got his Tomahawk and 1700X at the same time as i did and bricked his mobo just by updating the BIOS from windows (yes, it might be stupid in hindsight, but it has always worked in my experience). Luckily I learned from his mistakes and updated successfully with a pen-drive

Some quick benchmarks:

Out of the box (3.4ghz, mem @ 2133mhz, etc ...)
  • Blender (RYZEN workflow): 0:28:24
  • Cinebench: 1439
  • Cpu-z (ST): 375
  • Cpu-z (MT): 4191
After minor tweaking (3.8Ghz, mem @ 3200mhz):
  • Blender (RYZEN workflow): 0:24:45
  • Cinebench: 1621 (average with BG stuff running, best run 1695)
  • Cpu-z (ST): 439
  • Cpu-z (MT): 4742
  • AIDA64 trial: mem-read 47.1 GB/s, latency 77.9ns
Here is the CPU-Z validation link
AIDA64 trial screenshot (not sure why it claims it.s 1.0.0.4a)

Now I only wish I had a decent Video Card (and curse all the miners!)
 

ScottAD

Senior member
Jan 10, 2007
735
77
91
Well, I set up the rig on saturday, only to find out that my video card was dead. Only got it replaced today with a temporary 770GTX.

Other than the ludicrous post-time of the mobo, it works very well. Memory OC was tons easier than I was afraid of. Got 2933 MHz with the ancient bios, as soon as I enabled the XMP profile. Once I updated to AGESA 1.0.0.6 the XMP profile 2 just worked and gave me the rated 3200 MHz on auto! (didn't even try profile 1, no need )

On the CPU side, I played around but finally settled on 3800 MHz with everything on auto (with cool-and-quite enabled), as this is the most hassle-free and works well on pretty much stock voltage.

Withe the new BIOS it goes as low as 0.680v on idle. Normal benchmarks get it to 1.360v while Prime95 (large FFT torture test) goes up to 1.376v. The temps are ~65°C on full load in bencmarks (unless running a power-virus like Prime small FFT test, where it can go over 80°) In gaming workloads (Witcher III so far), they are about ~45°C.

I might manage to undervolt it a bit better manually, but already this seems quite ok for a 1700X, right?

I'm very very impressed with the CPU so far! Though the ecosystem itself is still a bit rough ... for instance, a buddy of mine got his Tomahawk and 1700X at the same time as i did and bricked his mobo just by updating the BIOS from windows (yes, it might be stupid in hindsight, but it has always worked in my experience). Luckily I learned from his mistakes and updated successfully with a pen-drive

Some quick benchmarks:

Out of the box (3.4ghz, mem @ 2133mhz, etc ...)
  • Blender (RYZEN workflow): 0:28:24
  • Cinebench: 1439
  • Cpu-z (ST): 375
  • Cpu-z (MT): 4191
After minor tweaking (3.8Ghz, mem @ 3200mhz):
  • Blender (RYZEN workflow): 0:24:45
  • Cinebench: 1621 (average with BG stuff running, best run 1695)
  • Cpu-z (ST): 439
  • Cpu-z (MT): 4742
  • AIDA64 trial: mem-read 47.1 GB/s, latency 77.9ns
Here is the CPU-Z validation link
AIDA64 trial screenshot (not sure why it claims it.s 1.0.0.4a)

Now I only wish I had a decent Video Card (and curse all the miners!)

Use the Beta BIOS, post times are nonexistent then.

https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=283344.0
 

Gideon

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2007
1,769
4,122
136
Yes, i was looking at HWINFO as well, but couldn't find any VRM temp info there, so I guess the tomahawk doesn't report it

This is a screenshot while running Prime95 (large FFT, max power-consumption) test for about 30 minutes . All the MB info in HWiNFO is listed on the right side, but no VRM info (I can also send the csv dump, if it helps).



I currently set the voltage in BIOS to 1.3375v and LLC to Mode2 (20%). This lowered the voltage a bit in Prime95. During this 30 minute power test the Core voltage alternated between 1.352v - 1.360v and the temps didn't exceed 80 degrees. In Blender, Cinebench, and non-power Prime tests it doesn't go above 1.344v.

The only slight concern i have (vs Auto voltage) is that now my idle is a bit on the high side, being around 1.328v during average desktop use. That shouldn't be anything catastrophic as AMD only warns against going over 1.35v 24/7, but still i would like it to be lower. Therefore, I'm currently playing around with the Windows Power plans to get the <1v idle back.
 
Reactions: Drazick

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,027
11,606
136
Weird that it reports no VRM data. Looking at other posts regarding this board, it appears that others have had the same issue. Apparently most have taken to checking the reported motherboard temp as being as close to the VRM temp as they can get without a heat gun. Your mobo temp is really high, so watch out! Actually CPU temps seem pretty high too. Power draw doesn't look too bad though, only 199W peak.
 
Reactions: Drazick and Gideon

Gideon

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2007
1,769
4,122
136
Weird that it reports no VRM data. Looking at other posts regarding this board, it appears that others have had the same issue. Apparently most have taken to checking the reported motherboard temp as being as close to the VRM temp as they can get without a heat gun. Your mobo temp is really high, so watch out! Actually CPU temps seem pretty high too. Power draw doesn't look too bad though, only 199W peak.
That's a good catch, thank you! Will probably lower the OC for now, as it's not really needed yet. At stock, the MOBO temp after ~30 minutes of Prime is 85° and system power draw 147W peak, (though ryzen master only reports 69° on CPU die). I can see that the VRMs get reaaally hot very quickly.

I wish I knew all this when choosing the motherboard .Would have probably tried X370 Taichi and it's P-State OC or something, but nice to know regardless!
 
Reactions: Drazick
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |