Does not detect overclock, duh. Presumable it is 4.4Ghz.
Btw, Ryzen looks just fine here, but hey, for some if it is not faster than Skylake, it is literally new bulldozer.
It is reported qual sample SKU, man, i have literally linked it to ya.
Does not detect overclock, duh. Presumable it is 4.4Ghz.Haswell @ 3.20Ghz beats Skylake @ 4.00Ghz in Single Thread performance. Sounds legit.
It is reported qual sample SKU, man, i have literally linked it to ya.I also literally pointed that out a few minutes ago in this thread. That Engineering Sample photo only shows up recently, and is only referenced in posts about Ryzen pricing yet none of the SKUs start with ZD.
What's your point, in that benchmark apparently not even an i7 6700K @ 4Ghz can beat it either. This whole benchmark is FUD and entirely suspect.
It is reported qual sample SKU, man, i have literally linked it to ya.
6700k has worse IPC than your G3258 in your own link. LITERALLY BULLDOZER.The 6700K at least has better IPC.
You call that negative light? As someone else has laid out in math, it is the very same performance we have been expecting since The Stilt kickstarted the 1Ghz hypothesis.Every single time a dubious Zen benchmark pops up that portrays it in a negative light, all the hard core intel fans pop up and start talking about it.
You call that negative light? As someone else has laid out in math, it is the very same performance we have been expecting since The Stilt kickstarted the 1Ghz hypothesis.
Well, only thing you need to do now is to find another AMD ES that was diffused in the US and made in China. Because obviously they would not fake that, or would they?Exactly, it's out there, wouldn't be the last time a faked benchmark used wildly spread ID.
My i5-6400 has lower score than this i3, i bet you. Does not make it a slower CPUI was referring to it having a lower score than an i3.
Which uses the same high-performance, same IPC Haswell cores as an i7.The 6700K at least has better IPC. Ryzen IPC is lower than 4th Gen i3. And passmark is not FUD. I've been watching the baselines every day. There are over 50 new baselines coming in every day that outscore Ryzen.
Btw, a 5820K is only 1% slower than Ryzen in multithreaded.
The 6700K at least has better IPC. Ryzen IPC is lower than 4th Gen i3. And passmark is not FUD. I've been watching the baselines every day. There are over 50 new baselines coming in every day that outscore Ryzen.
Btw, a 5820K is only 1% slower than Ryzen in multithreaded.
Well, only thing you need to do now is to find another AMD ES that was diffused in the US and made in China. Because obviously they would not fake that, or would they?
My i5-6400 has lower score than this i3, i bet you. Does not make it a slower CPU
Thought it was 500?There are over 50 new baselines coming in every day that outscore Ryzen.
raghu to prove that Ryzen is just as amazing as he expected? Just kidding, but i'll just say that it would be posted by the only reasonable guy in the most of the forum.If this were SA, you know who would be posting it.
I didn't say Passmark is FUD, I use Passmark... just the benchmark posted is suspicious.
Well, only thing you need to do now is to find another AMD ES that was diffused in the US and made in China. Because obviously they would not fake that, or would they?
The 6700K at least has better IPC. Ryzen IPC is lower than 4th Gen i3. And passmark is not FUD. I've been watching the baselines every day. There are over 50 new baselines coming in every day that outscore Ryzen.
Btw, a 5820K is only 1% slower than Ryzen in multithreaded.
You have suggested the picture is fake as well [i.e. a Bristol Ridge ES].Who said anything about faking the hardware... I was talking about taking the ID string that's going around and faking a benchmark with it.
First thing we have had on it's performance in weeks? And it is precisely what we have come to expect already.but I love all the people coming out of the woodwork suddenly
Thought it was 500?
I'll take Useless facts for 200, Alex.I'm just highlighting the fact that a lot of people are uploading higher scoring baselines every day.
You have suggested the picture is fake as well [i.e. a Bristol Ridge ES].
First thing we have had on it's performance in weeks? And it is precisely what we have come to expect already.
I didn't say Passmark is FUD, I use Passmark... just the benchmark posted is suspicious.
You and all of us here know that evaluating the results as "slower than i3" and "losing to 3-year old $50 CPU" is misleading. It's a single-thread test, it shows single-thread performance. Your "3-year old $50 CPU" also beats a 1-year old $350 CPU from Intel. Stop trying to push this bull over on us, you've been here long enough that you know the pertinent facts about CPU architecture and single-thread performance that are important in evaluating these results.The 6700K at least has better IPC. Ryzen IPC is lower than 4th Gen i3. And passmark is not FUD. I've been watching the baselines every day. There are over 50 new baselines coming in every day that outscore Ryzen.
Btw, a 5820K is only 1% slower than Ryzen in multithreaded.
I
6950X outscores Ryzen by 30% in multithreaded. A complete stomp.
You get to compare the Pentium single-thread performance to Ryzen single-thread performance and say misleading things about it, but when it's turned around, now it's about multi-thread. What the heck?6950X outscores Ryzen by 30% in multithreaded. A complete stomp.