The Stilt
Golden Member
- Dec 5, 2015
- 1,709
- 3,057
- 106
Is any of it wrong? D:
No idea if any of it is either wrong or accurate.
I asked just for the sake of argument.
Is any of it wrong? D:
Should I make sure I'm off on 2/28 so I can hit microcenter when they open to score a ryzen to resell?
That joke went over your head I see.
Add an I after the first D
Prepare for iPhones lines bro..iPhone lines.
I've heard otherwise, but I'm not sure if it is depending on the region.
Anyway, the alledged leaks we've seen so far are not done on review parts.
The review parts are supposed to have retail markings on them.
PR (QS) is still ZD, but those are not sent to the reviewers.
it is fake, see l1 and l2 cachesIt seems that chinese firm has it. No ES code: http://imgur.com/a/yM9l4
R5 1400X (4c/8t 65W) rated 4GHz by windows. Included a screen with lightly loaded CPU and mean clock of 4.52GHz (XFR in action i presume)
it is fake, see l1 and l2 caches
4x64 (Zen has 32 d/i each, right?) = 256 L1it is fake, see l1 and l2 caches
The only wrong number is L2 cache.it is fake, see l1 and l2 caches
What happens if AMD have sandbagged their ES and QS chips and on retail chip they unleash the hammer again?
256KB of IL1. There are other 128KB of DL1.The only wrong number is L2 cache.
Zen has 256 KB L1, 2 MB L2, 8 MB L3.
Skylake: 128 KB L1, 1 MB L2, 8 MB L3.
I think renamed skylake.Ha, i didn't notice it... Can't be windows problem?
For example, here:256KB of IL1. There are other 128KB of DL1.
I am confused. Other screens that are around, with ES?
Prepare for iPhones lines bro..iPhone lines.
Then OEMs and component makers are screwed because they couldn't validate with production silicon.