Could some one with a 6700k or 7700k run the cpuz bench and post a picture of it please so I can see where it stands vs. what has been posted? Pretty pretty please?? Thanks!!
6700K at 4GHZ
Could some one with a 6700k or 7700k run the cpuz bench and post a picture of it please so I can see where it stands vs. what has been posted? Pretty pretty please?? Thanks!!
Wouldn't be a problem if AMD simply internally gimped memory performance... Would be pretty easy to do, but they still wouldn't be able to hide their full performance.
Could some one with a 6700k or 7700k run the cpuz bench and post a picture of it please so I can see where it stands vs. what has been posted? Pretty pretty please?? Thanks!!
Thank you very much!! So Skylake and Kabylake wins on single thread performance ever so slightly vs. Ryzen but looses horribly on multi thread performance.. I had just purchased a i7 7700k over the weekend too, now thinking of returning since I haven't opened it yet and instead going with 8c/16t Ryzen R1800x.. I wish there were more Ryzen benchies I could go on so I could make up my mind what to do.
6700K at 4GHZ
Thank you very much!! So Skylake and Kabylake wins on single thread performance ever so slightly vs. Ryzen but looses horribly on multi thread performance.. I had just purchased a i7 7700k over the weekend too, now thinking of returning since I haven't opened it yet and instead going with 8c/16t Ryzen R1800x.. I wish there were more Ryzen benchies I could go on so I could make up my mind what to do.
That CPU-Z bench is really impressive, especially if that's a 65w part.
Ryzen 6/12 3.3 - 3.7Ghz
ST Score: 1888
MT Score: 12544
My 5820K @ 4.25GHz
ST: 1929
MT Score: 11872
Amazing if true. I was planning on buying the cheapest 6/12 Ryzen CPU for my Plex server, but man; this is making me want to replace my Main rig with the 8/16 variant...
I'll run the test at stock speeds when I get the chance. Probably tonight
But thats a 1600 or a 1600X? be carefull with X and their XFR when comparing benchs, specially very short benchs like that one, it could be running way over 4ghz for all we know.
XFR auto-overclocks it over the turbo clocks, we cant really be sure of the frecuency on ST or MT, it could be 4.2 ST, 4 MT, or more.It could be but not really if you factor in multi threading result.
Even at equal clocks for turbo single vs all cores, the scaling is very good. If ST turbo would be higher, the MT result would be inexplainable.
I really really am wanting the 8c/16t 1800x 3.6-4.0ghz model now that I've seen what a 6c/12t can do. The only thing holding me back from returning my 7700k is what if when released the price actually ends up being $800 or $1000 instead of the rumored $450-$500.00. I am hoping to get a CPU/Mobo combo deal for $700-$750 tops since I already have DDR4 ram raring and waiting to go.
But thats a 1600 or a 1600X? be carefull with X and their XFR when comparing benchs, specially very short benchs like that one, it could be running way over 4ghz for all we know.
XFR auto-overclocks it over the turbo clocks, we cant really be sure of the frecuency on ST or MT, it could be 4.2 ST, 4 MT, or more.
XFR auto-overclocks it over the turbo clocks, we cant really be sure of the frecuency on ST or MT, it could be 4.2 ST, 4 MT, or more.
Anyone got a clue how this bench scales with HT?
I really really am wanting the 8c/16t 1800x 3.6-4.0ghz model now that I've seen what a 6c/12t can do. The only thing holding me back from returning my 7700k is what if when released the price actually ends up being $800 or $1000 instead of the rumored $450-$500.00. I am hoping to get a CPU/Mobo combo deal for $700-$750 tops since I already have DDR4 ram raring and waiting to go.
Just with affinity:
I7-3770k @4.1GHz
4C/4T
Single 1774
Multi 6714
4C/8T
Single 1772
Multi 7641
That's not correct per people who are under NDA and can't disclose more.
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/speculation-on-ryzen-overclocking.2499538/#post-38744062
.Even tho those numbers look really promising this entire situation reminds me of the hype AMD was trying to pull with bulldozer. Hope it works out and its not AMD playing games again.[/QUOTE said:Me too.. I know all to well about the AMD hype wagon. They got me with the 939 x2 3600+,AM2 X4 940,AM3+ x4 fx8100,and Fm2+ x4 760k. Was not to happy with any of them. I did however really like the AM3+ FX-8300 and my Am1 5370 rigs. Both were cheapo buys and both overclock like champs..
Anything that isn't massively 256bit AVX1/2/FMA should all fit in that category.The CPU-Z benchmark uses legacy code. The benchmark it runs is compiled with extremely old MSVC 2008, without SSE2 instructions being enabled.
In this type of a workload Zen is extremely strong.
I wonder what will happen on the reviews day, what kind of workloads will be used by certain websites .Anything that isn't massively 256bit AVX1/2/FMA should all fit in that category.