With 6 core CCX it will be very simple.
Mmm... 12C/24T.
I will content myself with 8C/16T for the time being. Come on RyZen, deliver on the hype train!
Can someone try forward dating their system and running 3Dmark and see if 3Dmark reads system date. They may be forward dating to bypass some software licences or to avoid detection from something, it would be funny if 3DMark can't pick that up.
Can someone try forward dating their system and running 3Dmark and see if 3Dmark reads system date. They may be forward dating to bypass some software licences or to avoid detection from something, it would be funny if 3DMark can't pick that up.
Can we be a little smug if we resisted buying Broadwell, Skylake, and Kabylake?
Can I be smug, when I am writing this from 7 year old computer?Can we be a little smug if we resisted buying Broadwell, Skylake, and Kabylake?
Mockingbird, that is already posted.
Perhaps you know why the date is wrong, just after midnight on 2/25/17, for Fire Strike?
We don't need translation, we know the specs of 1700X and we have the numbers now. Easy to extrapolate relative performance/clock and positioning Vs intel parts. We had done exactly that on previous pages.I haven't seen translation of the original article posted.
Check IEC's post above. He time-traveled too by simply changing the system date and time.Mockingbird, that is already posted.
Perhaps you know why the date is wrong, just after midnight on 2/25/17, for Fire Strike?
Well, we all went to Google Translate immediately...so we've already seen that, and it's kind of iffy anyway.I haven't seen translation of the original article posted.
We know it can be done, but why? And why that date just after midnight?We don't need translation, we know the specs of 1700X and we have the numbers now. Easy to extrapolate relative performance/clock and positioning Vs intel parts. We had done exactly that on previous pages.
Check IEC's post above. He time-traveled too by simply changing the system date and time.
They would get bashed for lower single threaded performance than Intel X/Y, even if having 1/2 or 2/3 better MT. This factor is probably what is keeping the pricing down.Prices seem to be low for the leaked performance. It looks like AMD could easily go considerably higher on prices.
Do you really think this benchmark was fake?We know it can be done, but why? And why that date just after midnight?
Why obscure the family info on CPU-Z? When it already says what chip it is?
3DXpoint is kinda leaning me towards Intel
ST performance, at least in Cinebench R15, seems to be right with Intel though?They would get bashed for lower single threaded performance than Intel X/Y, even if having 1/2 or 2/3 better MT. This factor is probably what is keeping the pricing down.
Also if they limited it to HEDT area of X99, the adressable market would be too low for them to make decent money.
In the JPR GPU reports, they state that 99% of Intel consumer CPUs (sold into PCs, notebooks, as opposed into servers) have integrated GPU. Which means that X99 CPUs are only 1% of Intel sales and thus roughly 1% or less of PC market.
We know it can be done, but why? And why that date just after midnight?
Why obscure the family info on CPU-Z? When it already says what chip it is?
Where did you get that idea?Do you really think this benchmark was fake?
Do you really think this benchmark was fake?
Not on par with the higher-clocked Kaby Lakes, though? (most importantly 7700K and its 4,5 GHz turbo).ST performance, at least in Cinebench R15, seems to be right with Intel though?