AMD Ryzen (Summit Ridge) Benchmarks Thread (use new thread)

[IEC]

Sweepr, what's with the thread title?

I'm speechless.

Well, it's obvious the thread was created to control the narrative. Shouldn't be surprising, and it's not the first time.

 

[Sweepr]

No, it should be 40% "+" over excavator.
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/core-i3-6300-mini-review-atenra.2456159/#post-37868274
Aten-ras benchmark so no bias towards intel.
Excavator at 25% higher clocks @4.35Ghz and haswell @3.5Ghz is still ~34% faster.
At least for CB15 zen should be a good bit slower then haswell.

The leaked result puts it about on par with Sandy Bridge performance per clock in CB R15, assuming that's Ryzen and it's running at 3.4 GHz+. Haswell-E is still well ahead, ~1400 points.

http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image//skymtl/CPU/BROADWELL-E/BROADWELL-E-35.jpg

 

[krumme]

I can now see we at present have an "Summit Ridge (zen) Benchmark" thread title.
With no mentioning of the only confirmed bm we have.
I asume that thread title was comming all the way. For my part i have waited for it for months.
I think its a shame we have a new cpu comming and this marketing show is what we get.

 

[TheELF]

Proofs, my friend, proofs. Then we can talk. Right now, without CPU-Z shots its FUD. Nothing more, nothing less.

Well sorry but there was no CPU-Z in the presentations they didn't even show task manager for the render bench while they did for handbrake.
Either take everything as a rumor or take everything as fact there is no picking and choosing.

 

[Glo.]

Well sorry but there was no CPU-Z in the presentations they didn't even show task manager for the render bench while they did for handbrake.
Either take everything as a rumor or take everything as fact there is no picking and choosing.

This logic is just LOL.

Sorry.

 

[PhonakV30]

Post 1 was edited but We Don't have CPU-Z yet? I think this should be "Rumor" not "Leak".
Does "Fake bench" count as Leak ?


Edit : Op Fixed it.Thanks.

 

[krumme]

Well, it's obvious the thread was created to control the narrative. Shouldn't be surprising, and it's not the first time.

Yes and as a proof of that the word "First" at the start of the thread title is now gone.

 

[raghu78]

No you won't.

You are already proclaiming a winner before independent reviews, and blaming other users when leaked results don't match your expectations. Try to be honest before calling out other people.

I did not proclaim anything. that was a statement with regards to that specific benchmark. You interpreted it as it was a statement across all benchmarks on average. I was impressed with the minimum base clock which was contrary to the 3 - 3.2 Ghz clocks many people were claiming would be the base clock. I am open about my support for the underdog. I am also a strong supporter of competition as it benefits the consumer the most. btw I recognize that Intel and Nvidia are dominant market leaders and AMD cannot achieve long term financial success without sustained innovation and excellent execution. What matters to me is that whether Zen is a decent start to a road to recovery for AMD and a return to competition in the CPU market. I don't care if Zen is slower than Skylake / Kabylake which it will most definitely will be. I care that AMD remains in the competitive zone and provides excellent perf/$ and forces Intel to cut prices and release faster products.

 

[Redentor]

LOL

https://twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/810862715233255424

 

[kraatus77]

Honestly 4/8t results won't be that good. i believe those results are from probably 2.8-3.0ghz zen 8/16t.

anyway, i always thought zen would be around IVB for st. and that would be good enough for many if power consumption is better and prices are lower for 8c. because you can always upgrade later to zen+.

 

[unseenmorbidity]

You are spot on. If anything shows AMD products in a poor light you can bet he will be the first to post it. It does not matter if its CPU or GPU or any other product. The next few weeks and months will see a lot more of such rubbish. I am just going to wait for the actual product reviews.

Isn't he the one that posted that total troll Zen ~ i7 980 thread?

Ohh wait, this is the troll thread... lol

 

[sirmo]

If I had to pick which benchmarks Zen was going to win or lose, I'd take real programs over synthetics. It can lose every synthetic for all I care.

 

[Sweepr]

No. Cinebench is a good Benchmark for a general view which reflected an average, also it scales nicely over many cores, which favours CPUs with many cores, even AMD used this in the past. Cinebench gave a good overview in the past. Poor CPUs like Bulldozer did poorly because it was a poor CPU.

Indeed. Here's a recent example:

Isn't he the one that posted that total troll Zen ~ i7 980 thread?

You sound familiar. Could swear I've seen you before.

 

[unseenmorbidity]

Hey guys, I just got a new leak in from my source in China.

Check out this Zen benchmark!!!




Totally legit... It's not like it took me two seconds to fake that in paint! Actually, it would be more accurate to say faking the likely fake in paint.






Do that again and you will be removed from the forum.


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director

 

[Nothingness]

Indeed. Here's a recent example:

To be fair, in that context they are using Cinebench to compare AMD vs AMD

 

[rainy]

Unbelievable how a leak that puts Ryzen 20% above stock 7700K in CB R15 (even if it only matches the 4C/8T competitor in Fritz Chess) already causes such mass hysteria from the usual suspects.

How you dare to call other members in such a way, when access to your forum profile isn't available publicly.
Are you trying to hide something?

Btw, as I see, you've posted those weak leaks on HardForum as scores:
https://hardforum.com/threads/amd-ryzen-8c-16t-cinebench-r15-fritz-chess-scores.1920313/

 

[blublub]

Hey guys, I just got a new leak in from my source in China.

Check out this Zen benchmark!!!

Totally legit... It's not like it took me two seconds to fake that in paint! Actually, it would be more accurate to say faking the fake.

Deleted...And from what I remembered after seeing it for 10s it only showed a score without a CPU info

 

[Sweepr]

Honestly 4/8t results won't be that good. i believe those results are from probably 2.8-3.0ghz zen 8/16t.

The Fritz Chess picture clearly indicates 16 threads.

 

[PhonakV30]

The Fritz Chess picture clearly indicates 16 threads.

But this doesn't say It's Ryzen.

 

[blublub]

But this doesn't say It's Ryzen.

Could be any INTC 8c CPU locked to lower frequencies

 

[Dresdenboy]

Is there some correlation between CB15 and Blender scores? This would put at least some credibility behind this score. Otherwise we might discuss until retail availability.

 

[waffleironhead]

Edit: missed them.

 

[unseenmorbidity]

Could be any INTC 8c CPU locked to lower frequencies

It could be a 6 core or a toaster. People fake this stuff all the time.

I didn't see one reliable leak from these Chinese forums when the RX480 was about to launch.

 

[PhonakV30]

Is there some correlation between CB15 and Blender scores? This would put at least some credibility behind this score. Otherwise we might discuss until retail availability.

Here link
Now compare it to Blender score, Maybe you find some correlation.I can't find a good database for blender

 

[Abwx]

Is there some correlation between CB15 and Blender scores? This would put at least some credibility behind this score. Otherwise we might discuss until retail availability.

Cinebench max out better the CPU with one thread/core than Blender, but If there s SMT enabled then the scores should be comparable, with some observations, though.

Blender and Cinebench 11.5 are both using 32bit FP precision while CB R15 can enable 64bit precision, but in this latter case Zen was even more improved (comparatively to the FX FPU) in FP64 than it is in FP32, also dunno if CB R15 actually use 64b FP in the bench.