He probably has pride in his work, something that can get lost when you start working for a big corporation. Hopefully it stays with him.
They should have hired him way earlier. Also, it's pretty funny that one man can make such a difference to, what i assume is a team of highly qualified software engineers.
Probably because Nvidia has the Apple-like ability to con its customers into buying $1,000 Titans that were no faster than a $550 AMD 290X just eight months later.No wonder these guys keep losing market share.
the guy who made radeonpro works at amd now, probably why this is coming to ccc finally
Probably because Nvidia has the Apple-like ability to con its customers into buying $1,000 Titans that were no faster than a $550 AMD 290X just eight months later.
If they care so much about power saving, they should put out designs like Maxwell which are efficient, not gimmicky driver updates like this.
Not to have a competitor bring nearly identical performance for half the price. Even in the computer world, that's extremely fast depreciation.8 months is a long time
If they care so much about power saving, they should put out designs like Maxwell which are efficient, not gimmicky driver updates like this.
Not to have a competitor bring nearly identical performance for half the price. Even in the computer world, that's extremely fast depreciation.
8 months is a long time
People were still buying 700 dollar 780Tis over 550 dollar 290Xs. Nvidia has a reality distortion field.
If they care so much about power saving, they should put out designs like Maxwell which are efficient, not gimmicky driver updates like this.
Probably because Nvidia has the Apple-like ability to con its customers into buying $1,000 Titans that were no faster than a $399 AMD 290 just eight months later.
As a gamer who lives for 60fps with vsync on how does this improve my lot in life with an AMD card? Though i'm hoping to live at 120fps 1080p if TV's ever get there.
I guess this is for non vsync users essentially?
I'd like to hear more, maybe Ryan can get more info about this and possible tie into an Omega Driver article? Pretty please.
as usual, it will probably be poorly implemented and not the most stable; unlike NVidia's solution which will be closed source but work consistently.
I wish AMD would just hire a few more developers to get things right. I really prefer them as a company and want to support them. The core setup of one monitor works pretty well but there's lots of fringe cases where things just aren't stable or half-complete. OpenCL comes to mind, it's there for marketing but nobody can use it.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/ev...r-rtss-design-concept-into-precisionx-15.htmlSounds like they're just aping what Nvidia was crowing about on the Titan release (the whole 'target frame rate' thing in EVGA precision).
They're talking about downclocking, not just frame limiting.
But like I said, Nvidia had this since the Titan, so it's not a novel idea.