Originally posted by: Def
Athlon64 looks like it thoroughly trounces the P4 in most tests between those two chips.
Go with an Athlon64 if you are actually looking to spend that much on a processor right now.
Originally posted by: Def
Athlon64 looks like it thoroughly trounces the P4 in most tests between those two chips.
Go with an Athlon64 if you are actually looking to spend that much on a processor right now.
Originally posted by: Shimmishim
Originally posted by: Def
Athlon64 looks like it thoroughly trounces the P4 in most tests between those two chips.
Go with an Athlon64 if you are actually looking to spend that much on a processor right now.
source?
Originally posted by: dexvx
Originally posted by: Shimmishim
Originally posted by: Def
Athlon64 looks like it thoroughly trounces the P4 in most tests between those two chips.
Go with an Athlon64 if you are actually looking to spend that much on a processor right now.
source?
I think he means the FX51. The A64 3200+ is about the same as a 3.2C.
Originally posted by: jiffylube1024
I'd get the Athlon. The P4 3.2C is IMO not worth it. If you're going to go for a P4, get a 2.6C or a 2.8C, or even a 3.0C (but even these are a tad pricey).
If you're going spend $400, I'd say go for the FX.
Originally posted by: ragazzo
My question is this: Will my Zalman CNPS7000A-Cu fit on the A64 3200 processor?