So
there's that
The
2.5 times is higher than the previous 2X energy efficiency claim. Let's hope that turns out to be true.
Breaking the laws of physics now, huh? :hmm:...and this is EXACTLY how BS rumors start on the Internet when
literal translations are misconstrued by sites like WCCFtech. Next thing you know "AMD promised us 2.5X perf/watt but they only managed to provide 80%. AMD lies, again, here is the quote from Raja...."
------
The Casual Sky Observer's Guide: Stargazing with Binoculars and Small Telescopes - pages 28-29
"
Star Brightness
A star's brightness is measured in magnitudes (mag). It's an old method, introduced by the Ancient Greeks. The stars were divided into six categories. The brightest stars belonged to the class of first magnitude, the faintest visible to the naked eye were called sixth magnitude stars. The Greeks didn't have telescopes in their era, so there were not aware of the fact that there were fainter stars than the naked eye can see.
A first magnitude star is 2.5 times brighter than a second magnitude star. A second magnitude star is 2.5 times brighter than a 3rd magnitude star, and so on. Thus a first magnitude star is 2.5 x 2.5 x 2.5 times brighter than a 4th magnitude star."
^
"Research reported in Science suggests that Polaris is
2.5 times brighter today than when Ptolemy observed it, changing from third to second magnitude."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaris#cite_note-16
So for example, this star's
magnitude could have changed 2.5 x 2.5 times instead of just 2.5 times. WCCFtech is correlating things to mean what they want them to mean. IMO, Raja is not stating anything about changing perf/watt efficiency from 2X to 2.5X. He is stating a
literal observation about this star.
A new low even for WCCF Tech.
Polaris stars, counting 1, 2,
3 = HL
3 confirmed.
2.5X brighter,
3 stars => Arctic Islands 2.5X faster with HBM
3 confirmed.
It seems likely at this point that that Polaris will be a large 2682mm^2 die, four and a half times larger than AMD's existing Fiji GPU. It's not known yet how they managed to get around the reticle limit, but we expect performance of this new part to be massive.
Star's age: Age
7×10^
7 years
7nm node confirmed!