- Oct 15, 2003
- 3,179
- 0
- 0
@the top right under Winchester.Originally posted by: Sunner
Where did Venice go?
Thw way I see it, FX is first and foremost a gaming solution, so the FX-61@3.2ghz should be more than enough to keep the gaming title firmly in AMD's camp.Originally posted by: Mik3y
So I'm seeing that there wont be any dual-cored FX's until 2006 under socket M2? I was expecting AMD to initially come out iwth a dual-cored FX to compete against Intel's upcoming dual-cored Pentium D X.
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
@the top right under Winchester.Originally posted by: Sunner
Where did Venice go?
Originally posted by: Mik3y
So I'm seeing that there wont be any dual-cored FX's until 2006 under socket M2? I was expecting AMD to initially come out iwth a dual-cored FX to compete against Intel's upcoming dual-cored Pentium D X.
It is too early to bet the farm on that one, and don't call me shirley Airplane rocked.Originally posted by: biostud
I think the regular dualcores will best Intels anyway. Intel had to drop to 3.2Ghz to get their dualcores running, AMD keep their current speeds. Surely AMD's dualcores will own any Intel dualcore.
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
It is too early to bet the farm on that one, and don't call me shirley Airplane rocked.Originally posted by: biostud
I think the regular dualcores will best Intels anyway. Intel had to drop to 3.2Ghz to get their dualcores running, AMD keep their current speeds. Surely AMD's dualcores will own any Intel dualcore.
Originally posted by: NightCrawler
Can't believe the FX will hit 3.2Ghz !!!!
Originally posted by: SonicIce
WHY DDR2? WHY WHY WHY?
Originally posted by: X
So much for AMD moving directly to DDR3.
Why is everyone saying August to upgrade? I heard the R520 was supposed to be ready by June as well. Obviously there is the risk of yet another paper launch, but that is equally true for the dualies.