In order to get 4 weeks/year where I work, you need to have been with the company for at least 15 years.
They do at least bump you up to 2 weeks in your 2nd year with the company. Some others won't even do that for several more years.
But they do also hand out extra vacation hours here and there for good performance, or holidays, or sometimes "just because."
tell him to stop working at mcdonalds
seriously, company can set whatever policy it wants. if it can't find or keep quality people, they'll eventually change their policy or disapear.
Or you get the other effect:
"Other companies are reducing their benefits packages down to utter crap. Now we can cut benefits too!"
Because the average Americans are morons compared to your average European. Hell, some of our most patriotic members will call the French and Italians scum and think how dare they get 5 weeks vacation, or how dare they get universal healthcare!. How will their businesses ever make the record profits like they do here with that thinking and afford to pay their CEO over 200x the salary of the average employee's wages!
It's a fascinating mindset indeed.
American's have been brainwashed in this country to slowly become legalized slaves. They have forgotten what it is like to live, aside from their routine go out to the bar every weekend or stay in some shitty all-inclusive hotel vacation where you don't even leave the resort.
...
And don't forget to take out as many loans as you can to buy whatever you want, so that you can be in debt your entire life.
Why do people think they should be able to take more than a week off at a time? Vacation is definitely necessary, but if you are in a position where taking 2+weeks off has no effect on the company- you are not critical, sorry.
"I'm planning to take 2 weeks off next month. We need to ensure that everything's taken care of so that can happen."
Even this is a reflection of that mindset: Effectively saying that if you are even
able to take a vacation, you're basically a worthless employee.
Over here (Germany) a normal job will give you 6 weeks of vacation and on top of that (in my state) 12 public holidays per year.
How anybody could accept a a job that offers no vacations at all is beyond me.
You're also in a country that believes in things like maintaining a strong manufacturing sector...something that's quite alien in this country, unfortunately. Or any manner of concern for a massive trade deficit, for that matter.
"You mean that we can get this thing made by near-slave-labor in China for 10% of what it costs us now? I can't see that there'd be
any downside to that. Let's do it!"
"They're doing layoffs because we don't build anything here anymore? How did
that happen?"
But only a few can become CEO's with golden parachutes and continually get bonuses and jobs no matter how much they failed before thanks to the corporate buddy system.
Even as it blamed unions for the bankruptcy and the 18,500 job losses that will ensue, Hostess already gave its executives pay raises earlier this year. The salary of the company’s chief executive
tripled from $750,000 to roughly $2.5 million, and at least nine other executives
received pay raises ranging from $90,000 to $400,000. Those raises came just months after Hostess originally filed for bankruptcy earlier this year.
Hostess is hardly the only company that has compensated its executives during bankruptcy or times of financial instability. Failed financial firm MF Global gave CEO Jon Corzine an
$8 million pay package after it filed for bankruptcy, and Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit received a
$6.7 million pay package when he resigned, despite Citi’s 88 percent profit loss during his final quarter. And Hostess isn’t alone in giving executives massive raises while asking for concessions from union workers either: construction giant Caterpillar rewarded its CEO with a 60 percent pay raise, paying him $17 million, even as it forced a
pay and pension freeze on its union workforce.
We all know they don't care about the employees or their country, but their devout followers who still drink the corporate Kool aid think they do what is best for the shareholders and company.
Unless anyone can explain why this sort of thing is a necessity for these companies, this kind of thing just reeks of severe corruption.
- Propose a wage and pension freeze for workers.
- This substantially reduces the company's projected costs.
- You get a pay increase for reducing costs.
- You occasionally see shadows of memories of what it was like back when you thought about workers as more than annoying expenses in a spreadsheet.
The problem is it becomes a cultural standard to have 2 weeks vacation and so there are a limited number of jobs that provide more than that. The only job I ever had that did was a sales job and nobody actually took their allotted vacation because the metrics you were required to meet didn't allow for it, so it was sort of a sham.
I mean you look at that wikipedia list and its pretty pathetic we're the only country with no standards. The problem though is that corporations own our government
Money is speech now.
If you'd like to write your Congressman about a problem or concern, be sure to include cash. If you want your speech to matter, you'll probably need a larger envelope to ensure that you can fit in an adequate amount of "speech," or else you'll need to use bigger denominations.
(Remember, it's not bribery. It's just money that accidentally got placed in an envelope for unspecified reasons.)