You just proved my point without even trying..
Ever heard of LCD math?
Least Common Denominator?
You may not like it, I may not like it either but it is what it is.
The LCD of the total 240 million voters is well and truly greater than the 75 million that actually saw the threat and objected.
Kinda stupid to assume they're on your side now vs Trump when they clearly didn't show any urgency to stop Trump's election.
It's like you're doing mental gymnastics to cope at this point dude..
What point was that? The one where you mentioend Asians, Latinos and Blacks who were flying Trump flags on their cars, and used them as an indication of proof that dumb people, out number the smart people? (kind of racist don't you think?) Or is it where I gave you the numbers showing that in total only 32% of the eligible voters or 22% of the total population, which included Asians, Latinos and Blacks, voted and supported Trump? leaving 68% or 78% that didn't which means they are at least smarter than those that went all in and voted for him? Now I know what you are trying to do, and that is implying that Only those that voted for Harris are smart, which isn't factual or provable. We do know that 77 million are dumb, as they proved it by voting Trump, or at least that is the indicator being used to determine being smart or dumb. But we have 1.9% or 3 million votes that went to a third party. Maybe they where the smartest of them all? We really don't know, But what we do know, is they where smart enough not to vote for Trump. Which would indicate that they are at least smarter than the Trump supporters. We aslso dont know out of the 90 million that didn't vote, why they didn't. Well we do know that 5 million where illegally purged and their votes where thrown out, and those where targeted at minorities, and other groups of people that normally vote democrat. We also have substantial voter supression in many red states that also could have influenced some of those 90 million that didn't vote, and possibly could have made it nearly impossible for them to make it to the polls (elderly). But in reality, you can't label the non voters as being as dumb as those that voted for Trump, or smart as those that voted Harris, unless you know exactly who they would have voted for, and why they didn't make it to the polls. Could they be considered dumb for not voting, sure. But they still didn't go all out and vote for Trump, which could indicate they where still smarter than a Trump supporter. So, is your LCD math that you are trying to use to counter, really factual? No..