Question 'Ampere'/Next-gen gaming uarch speculation thread

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ottonomous

Senior member
May 15, 2014
559
292
136
How much is the Samsung 7nm EUV process expected to provide in terms of gains?
How will the RTX components be scaled/developed?
Any major architectural enhancements expected?
Will VRAM be bumped to 16/12/12 for the top three?
Will there be further fragmentation in the lineup? (Keeping turing at cheaper prices, while offering 'beefed up RTX' options at the top?)
Will the top card be capable of >4K60, at least 90?
Would Nvidia ever consider an HBM implementation in the gaming lineup?
Will Nvidia introduce new proprietary technologies again?

Sorry if imprudent/uncalled for, just interested in the forum member's thoughts.
 

Glo.

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2015
5,761
4,666
136
About 9-10 months is the norm for GPUs as a whole. If there was a tape out right now, then you'd get a chip about November-ish.
Tape out should happen around April, for gaming, next gen GPUs, which makes them Q1/H1 2021 available.

Perfect for GTC 2021 release
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
Tape out should happen around April, for gaming, next gen GPUs, which makes them Q1/H1 2021 available.

Perfect for GTC 2021 release

Yeah, sounds fairly likely. For now I'll be very general and say sometime H1 2021 though, you never know with dates like this
 
Reactions: Glo.

insertcarehere

Senior member
Jan 17, 2013
639
607
136
Happens to everybody . I remember one guy not knowing who the ex-CanardPC chief was Fun times .

Since he is such a good source according to you, I am also gonna assume his radio silence on big Navi must indicate that we're not getting those until end of this year at the earliest.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
Since he is such a good source according to you, I am gonna assume his radio silence on big Navi must indicate that we're not getting those until end of this year at the earliest.
...or that he doesn't ever post AMD based rumours.

Nice try though, but it takes two minutes of checking his Twitter profile to see that.
 
Reactions: Glo.

Glo.

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2015
5,761
4,666
136
Since he is such a good source according to you, I am also gonna assume his radio silence on big Navi must indicate that we're not getting those until end of this year at the earliest.
He never posts AMD rumors, or rather - inside information, my friend. He is solely Nvidia focused, If I remember correctly.
 

insertcarehere

Senior member
Jan 17, 2013
639
607
136

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146

Idk what this is if not an AMD rumor, but OK 👌🏻
Look at the time stamp mate, not exactly a tapeout date, is it?

Navi was launched, what, 4 months later?

Also, I think it's techincally wrong, because you know, it's mostly a guess. Specifically the 32SIMD*2 part - pretty sure he's referring to cycles, and RDNA is Wave32 over a single cycle. So lol.
 
Last edited:

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
Don't try with them, they have fixated their mind on a preconcieved notion that NVIDIA is late, and their best evidence is an obscure twitter account. Some people never learn I guess.

They couldn't be more dead wrong.
This is actually factually wrong, but ok then. Sure.
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
Don't try with them, they have fixated their mind on a preconcieved notion that NVIDIA is late, and their best evidence is an obscure twitter account. Some people never learn I guess.

They couldn't be more dead wrong.

You keep calling everybody wrong, but you do not appear to have anything to back it up. Its fine to not agree with somebody on a piece of speculation, but calling somebody wrong "just because" goes against how threads on this forum should be conducted.
 
Reactions: Mopetar and Markfw

Muhammed

Senior member
Jul 8, 2009
453
199
116
You keep calling everybody wrong, but you do not appear to have anything to back it up. Its fine to not agree with somebody on a piece of speculation, but calling somebody wrong "just because" goes against how threads on this forum should be conducted.
Because random people on twitter are not sources, they are just rumor generators.
 

Muhammed

Senior member
Jul 8, 2009
453
199
116
Moving on, the specs for the 3070 and the 3080 are supposedly leaked:

The GA103 will come with 10/20GB GDDR6 VRAM capacity. IT will also feature SM (Streaming Multiprocessors) count of 60, 3840 stream processors and 320-bit video memory.

The GA104, on the other hand, will feature 8/16GB GDDR6 VRAM memory capacity along with 48 sets of SM arrays. There will be 3072 stream processors and 256-bit video memory.

the GA103 points towards the Nvidia RTX 3080 GPU while the latter indicates RTX 3070

 
Last edited:

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,829
5,442
136
That wouldn't be much of an SM count increase if real (esp given how big the increase in transistor density should be). Of course they could be spending a lot more on RT.
 

Glo.

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2015
5,761
4,666
136
Moving on, the specs for the 3070 and the 3080 are supposedly leaked:







Yeah, it was leaked.

https://twitter.com/kopite7kimi/status/1218229502423314434
#not

Im not targeting this at anyone but: how stupid can you be to believe in this "leak"?

Read all three Twitts. There is NO Ampere other than 7 nm TSMC, and no other than GA100. Only GA exists.
 
Reactions: uzzi38

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
Yeah, it was leaked.


#not

Im not targeting this at anyone but: how stupid can you be to believe in this "leak"?
Best bit is they just took Kopite's leak from months ago and made some diagrams based off of them hoping idiots would eat up the rumour. That what Kopite meant - that the diagrams aren't official ones.
 
Reactions: Glo.

Muhammed

Senior member
Jul 8, 2009
453
199
116
The Sketch is not official, it's just an illustration, funny enough, the leak is coming from another twitter account too. So it's up to you to believe which one is true!
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,223
1,598
136
The Sketch is not official, it's just an illustration, funny enough, the leak is coming from another twitter account too. So it's up to you to believe which one is true!

Given that it's a known fact Samsung is having issues with EUV especially on larger HPC dies and the suggested cards and code names make 0 sense, its' clear in what direction I would lean.

There never has been a xx1 or xx3 version. It's always been 100, 102, 104 and 106. That's already a clue the rumor is wrong. Then it's simply too many chips. With 7nm development costs, no way are they going to make that many chips that close to each other. Especially since the chips are probably rather big again and yields not great so there will be lots of binning opportunities.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
Look at the time stamp mate, not exactly a tapeout date, is it?

Navi was launched, what, 4 months later?

Also, I think it's techincally wrong, because you know, it's mostly a guess. Specifically the 32SIMD*2 part - pretty sure he's referring to cycles, and RDNA is Wave32 over a single cycle. So lol.
Well if nothing else, it seems we were wrong and he also thinks the Navi 21 rumours are reliable.

So er, that comment about Big Navi not taping out yet seems to have aged really poorly.

Seems like he just doesn't care enough about AMD stuff, that's all.
 

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,684
6,227
136
The problems with 7LPP for NVIDIA could probably be attributed to die sizes. 7LPP is fine for Mobile dies. Ian also mentioned N5 yields for HPC are crappy too.
But I bet NVIDIA will concentrate on HPC. Gaming is probably an afterthought.

Anyway, WhyCry said NV is expected to launch a new GPU in Q2 around the same time as Big Navi.


Not sure if the GPU is Ampere/Next Gen.
Because according to @KOMACHI_ENSAKA the next gen Gaming GPUs will be earliest Q4 this year


Also the new MX series are all Pascal based.
 

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,684
6,227
136
NVIDIA will want to thwart any AMD's attempt to steal the show around Computex which by AIB's account will launch Big Navi and I think WhyCry's source are quite consistent so far.
Question is which GPU will it be from NVIDIA to counter Big Navi. 2080Ti die size is already too big to compete with a much bigger RDNA(2) die. For comparison a Navi10 die on N7+ will be only 200+ mm2.
AMD will want to ride the Ryzen 4K hype to stir up interest on new Radeon products too.

Could it be the mesh shader thing for Multi GPU or a total new arch?
Can't imagine NVIDIA prioritizing DC over Gaming.
Right now the fabless companies have no choice but to start using Samsung as well, at least for the smaller dies.
 
Last edited:

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
The problems with 7LPP for NVIDIA could probably be attributed to die sizes. 7LPP is fine for Mobile dies. Ian also mentioned N5 yields for HPC are crappy too.
But I bet NVIDIA will concentrate on HPC. Gaming is probably an afterthought.
From my understanding (and I'm not taking a guess here), the issue with 7LPP/8LPP is pretty much for dies with a large number of logic levels. Power/perf and yields go to crap.

Anywho, server stuff is still intact, so that's pretty much exactly what they'll be doing.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |