Question 'Ampere'/Next-gen gaming uarch speculation thread

Page 47 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ottonomous

Senior member
May 15, 2014
559
292
136
How much is the Samsung 7nm EUV process expected to provide in terms of gains?
How will the RTX components be scaled/developed?
Any major architectural enhancements expected?
Will VRAM be bumped to 16/12/12 for the top three?
Will there be further fragmentation in the lineup? (Keeping turing at cheaper prices, while offering 'beefed up RTX' options at the top?)
Will the top card be capable of >4K60, at least 90?
Would Nvidia ever consider an HBM implementation in the gaming lineup?
Will Nvidia introduce new proprietary technologies again?

Sorry if imprudent/uncalled for, just interested in the forum member's thoughts.
 

Tabalan

Member
Feb 23, 2020
41
25
91
What rumors? Any link?
There were some rumours about Ampere RTX 30 series that it will include DLSS 3.0. Making DLSS as common as possible is very reasonable, will boost Nvidia performance a lot. Tho, rumours are only rumours till RTX release, so don't take it for granted.
 

Glo.

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2015
5,761
4,666
136
Fine, not your speculation, someone elses. The crux of my point left unanswered: what is below a 3080 102 that serves as the mid-range and not cost an arm and a leg?
It appears also its not Kopite's speculation .

Do you NEED an Nvidia card? There will be alternatives, you know, maybe even faster and more efficient, you know?

Well the plus of this situation is that Nvidia can maximize the SKU numbers from dies, so they can release for example 3070 Ti, based on 102 or 104 die, depending on the competitions performance. The same thing can happen with 3060 Ti SKU and it can be released using both: 104 or 106 die. ETC, etc, etc...

I don't believe we, consumers have to worry about anything. This generation upcoming might end up better from perf/dollar perspective than previous generation.

However, Highest end will not be cheaper than 1000 bucks...
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
Wasn't Kopite adamant GA102 taped out in March? Is it even possible for Nvidia to have gotten silicon back so quickly?
Taped out = come back from the fabs.

Unless you work in AMD/Intel/Nvidia itself as an engineer or high up in management, you likely don't even know when chips get sent over to the fabs, only when they come back.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
There were some rumours about Ampere RTX 30 series that it will include DLSS 3.0. Making DLSS as common as possible is very reasonable, will boost Nvidia performance a lot. Tho, rumours are only rumours till RTX release, so don't take it for granted.
Sorry to say but MLID is spouting BS. He doesn't even believe the rumours himself.

I have a quote from another one of these types of Youtubers who I know is friends with MLID stating so.
 
Reactions: Glo.

rainy

Senior member
Jul 17, 2013
508
427
136
Why is it so hard to believe, that RTX 3080 could use 300W of power, and RTX 3090 375W's, considering even the person who has got legit, correct info touts that 102 based GPUs draw anywhere between 300-375W of power?

For someone like sontin (some other guys too) who is worshiping Nvidia, it's simply unthinkable.


You can't call people worshippers of nvidia anymore than you can call them fanboys.

AT Moderator ElFenix
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reactions: Stuka87 and Glo.

FiendishMind

Member
Aug 9, 2013
60
14
81
Taped out = come back from the fabs.

Unless you work in AMD/Intel/Nvidia itself as an engineer or high up in management, you likely don't even know when chips get sent over to the fabs, only when they come back.
Has Kopite clarified that as their meaning? I mean those are two very different things. I know of other "tape out" leaks that were clearly leaks of the actual tape out, the original Ampere/GA100 tape out leak for instance.

Considering they will release RTX 3080 first, cut down chip, yes its possible they can rush this GPU.

Yields, you know?
That seems so fast though, I've always heard it's like six months from initial tape out to getting silicon back and then three to six more months before product launch.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,702
6,405
146
Has Kopite clarified that as their meaning? I mean those are two very different things. I know of other "tape out" leaks that were clearly leaks of the actual tape out, the original Ampere/GA100 tape out leak for instance.


That seems so fast though, I've always heard it's like six months from initial tape out to getting silicon back and then three to six more months before product launch.
Like what? Tapeout always refers to getting chips back from the fabs.
 
Reactions: Glo.

FiendishMind

Member
Aug 9, 2013
60
14
81
Like what? Tapeout always refers to getting chips back from the fabs.
Are you sure? I could be mistaken but I lurk Beyond3D and RealWorldTech forums a lot and I've seen "tape outs" explained numerous times, tape out leaks are commonly discussed and the discussions always to refer to tape outs and getting silicon back as very separate things.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,104
136
Oh hell, people will care. The last last bastion of rhetorhic against AMD GPUs will fall. Bashing AMD for their GPUs being inefficient, and buying Nvidia cards, despite AMD GPUs being better value, will make people only look like complete hypocrites if they will not bash Nvidia, for the same thing, and buying Nvidia GPUs if the only thing Nvidia can do to compete with AMD is to lower prices below AMD offerings.

Its the same dilemma between RX 570 vs GTX 1050 Ti all over again but in reverse.

Will people buy more RX 6500 XT's, than direct competitor from Nvidia, if it is more efficient, than GTX 3050 Ti, despite being slower and costing the same?
It's not the last bastion, there's still the driver issue. AMD has to hit the market with better day one drivers or people will be turned off (as happened with Navi 10).
 
Reactions: Elfear and Konan

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,104
136
Taped out = come back from the fabs.

Unless you work in AMD/Intel/Nvidia itself as an engineer or high up in management, you likely don't even know when chips get sent over to the fabs, only when they come back.
Tape out means design implementation is sent to the fab. Mask are made etc. First silicon is when the company gets the first chips back from the factory.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
5,593
8,769
136
^^This is correct ^^
x3.

Depending on how high priority you are and how busy the fab is, it's possible to get a small volume, rushed order of chips back from the fab within a couple of months so you can start testing. Then the rest of the order will come later during the normal delivery window.
 
Reactions: FaaR

Tup3x

Golden Member
Dec 31, 2016
1,008
996
136
Because the numbers, yes theoretical, show that Ampere is actually less efficient in FP32/64 per watt.

Also, so FP32 Load is not "full" load, now. Got it.

Also, its actually on you to prove that that 400W TDP rating is not done on maximum load of FP32 numbers... And that it is not full load.
Wait what... So you can pull numbers out of your hat but I can't? That isn't fair. In any case, it's meant to do totally different thing that gaming cards. Also gaming Ampere likely has different tensor cores too so their efficiency and power consumption is likely very different. If I'd had to guess a random number, I doubt that we'll see much difference in power consumption compared to Turing (vs. same price range cards). They'll push 'em further if they think that's what it takes... there's not much point at worrying about that.
According to rumours DLSS 3.0 is supposed to work with every game with TAA implemented. They'll just suggest using those games and Ampere GPUs will run circles around Turing/Pascal.
I don't see how that's possible...
 
Last edited:

Glo.

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2015
5,761
4,666
136
Wait what... So you can pull numbers out of your hat but I can't? That isn't fair. In any case, it's meant to do totally different thing that gaming cards. Also gaming Ampere likely has different tensor cores too so their efficiency and power consumption is likely very different. If I'd had to guess a random number, I doubt that we'll see much difference in power consumption compared to Turing (vs. same price range cards).
First, I haven't pulled those numbers out of thin air, every human being that has IQ level even 5 points above 90 pts is capable of calculating them.

Secondly: Other sources quote even worse numbers than I do, for RTX 3080 power consumption. https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3080-cooler-could-cost-up-to-150-usd-alone

So deal with it my friend. Next gen Nvidia GPUs will not be as efficient as you, and others, hope and dream, but that was expected since they are made on 10 nm Samsung process.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |