- Dec 25, 2008
- 9,110
- 1,260
- 126
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7003/the-haswell-review-intel-core-i74770k-i54560k-tested
Why has no one posted this yet ?
Why has no one posted this yet ?
Last edited:
Time to grab a drink and start reading!
:|Final Words
Im a fan of Haswell, even on the desktop. The performance gains over Ivy Bridge depend on workload, but in general youre looking at low single digits to just under 20%. We saw great behavior in many of our FP heavy benchmarks as well as our Visual Studio compile test. If youre upgrading from Sandy Bridge you can expect to see an average improvement just under 20%, while coming from an even older platform like Nehalem will yield closer to a 40% increase in performance at the same clocks. As always, annual upgrades are tough to justify although Haswell may be able to accomplish that in mobile.
And I quote:Gaming benches being GPU limited with max settings and 1440p was....really Anand?
After spending far too much time on the Iris Pro test system, I didnt have a ton of time left over to do a lot of gaming performance testing with Haswell. Luckily Ian had his gaming performance test data already in the engine, so I borrowed a couple of graphs.
- 70% of CPUs can clock to 4.5GHz
- 30% of CPUs can clock to 4.6GHz
- 20% of CPUs can clock to 4.7GHz
- 10% of CPUs can to 4.8GHz
And K models contain TSX.
And K models contain TSX.
And K models contain TSX.
Here is GT3e: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested
Big differences to A10-4600M.
At what, exactly? The guys that held out, only to get a processor that's 10% faster?I think us 2500K guys are still laughing.
Performance comes at a premium. It's not exactly a secret.Yeah about $300 on the chip alone. D: