blackangst1
Lifer
- Feb 23, 2005
- 22,914
- 2,359
- 126
Well, so far Trump hasnt legitimized the theory, only saying he'd look into it. Im sure he'll fall for it though. We'll see.
Well, so far Trump hasnt legitimized the theory, only saying he'd look into it. Im sure he'll fall for it though. We'll see.
Well, so far Trump hasnt legitimized the theory, only saying he'd look into it. Im sure he'll fall for it though. We'll see.
Well, so far Trump hasnt legitimized the theory, only saying he'd look into it. Im sure he'll fall for it though. We'll see.
"A very super intelligent high T professor said that".
Nope. No legitimization there.
Well, so far Trump hasnt legitimized the theory, only saying he'd look into it. Im sure he'll fall for it though. We'll see.
That is the game the Angstman plays......That legitimizes it. If you're not denouncing it as horseshit, you're giving it legitimacy by implying it's possible, even if it's not plausible.
Sometimes it’s best to put trolls on ignore.Ehm. I dont know how to respond to that.
The technical name is put the troll on trollgnore!!!!!Sometimes it’s best to put trolls on ignore.
I guess so. But dont leave out the rest of the story. The moment I got called out for using the term, I immediately rectified it. From my own post:
How about this. Kamala was a baby who was born on American soil whose parents werent citizens. Hows that?
I have NEVER in this thread defended the term, and immediately rectified it. I guess the rest of the posters here only see my first post where I used it. Theyre lack of intelligence seems to have prevented them from reading my redaction.
edit: the disturbing thing is you guys dont know when to back the fuck off when I do correct myself, while totally ignoring the meat of my post...which is Kamala is totally qualified to serve.
And you call my behavior disturbing?
Well, so far Trump hasnt legitimized the theory, only saying he'd look into it. Im sure he'll fall for it though. We'll see.
yeah, totally what John McCain did when the Palin idiots at his rally started chanting the birther shit about Obama. McCain just played it off like, "maybe so, maybe not, I don't know really," right?
Remember that guy, McCain?
funny shit, it's weird no one gave him any flack for being born in Panama.
Oh, as mentioned earlier, that distended rectum that is Ted Cruz, a Canadian, ....why doesn't any Pub ever call him out?
These are grand mysteries.
Thats dishonest at best.It's official: Ted Cruz a citizen of the U.S. - and the U.S. only - CNNPolitics
It's official. Sen. Ted Cruz is now a citizen of the United States -- and the United States only.www.cnn.com
That is just thr Angstman being the Angstman!!Thats dishonest at best.
That doesn't matter in the eyes of the U.S. constitution, as it mentions nation of birth specifically. You can't renounce having been born in Canada, dude... lolllIt's official: Ted Cruz a citizen of the U.S. - and the U.S. only - CNNPolitics
It's official. Sen. Ted Cruz is now a citizen of the United States -- and the United States only.www.cnn.com
That legitimizes it. If you're not denouncing it as horseshit, you're giving it legitimacy by implying it's possible, even if it's not plausible.
IMO the only question is will Trump actively advocate this flavour of birtherism or whether he'll happily dog-whistle it through "mentions" like "people are saying".
If it's not about race why did the Democrats expressly say they are not questioning John McCain's citizenship and he actually was not born in the United States but in the Panama Canal Zone.I heard this earlier this week. It has nothing to do with her race, however. But the argument is per the Constitution, as we all have read Im sure, is:
Now, the birther people claim there is a loophole for anchor babies (which Kamala is) that technically doesnt fall under the "natural born citizen" statement. However, the Constitution makes no much mention of this, and SCOTUS has already determined anchor babies ARE in fact natural born citizens, REGARDLESS of the baby's parent's status. Also, the birther people are arguing since she grew up as a teenager in Canada, she's disqualified. Which is bullshit, of course, because she DOES meet the requirement of time lived in the USA.
In other words, the whole thing is bullshit and not even worth the breath to argue about it.
Read the definition of promote. That is exactly what Trump did. Using the "some people are saying" bit. Citing a well respected lawyer. You don't have to explicitly agree with something to promote it.Well, so far Trump hasnt legitimized the theory, only saying he'd look into it. Im sure he'll fall for it though. We'll see.
to help or encourage to exist or flourish; further:to promote world peace.
to advance in rank, dignity, position, etc. (opposed to demote).
That doesn't matter in the eyes of the U.S. constitution, as it mentions nation of birth specifically. You can't renounce having been born in Canada, dude... lolll
Read the definition of promote. That is exactly what Trump did. Using the "some people are saying" bit. Citing a well respected lawyer. You don't have to explicitly agree with something to promote it.
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!www.dictionary.com
Racism is so ingrained in the Republican party that even when explicitly explained, they truly can't see it. It's just "normal" for them.
Yep, its not "real racism" because there wasn't an all white lynch mob literally saying "kill the n-----!" with a noose. Hell even then they'd be doing everything they can to go "that's not real!"