Well he's just barely an adult. In our brave new Obama world, you're not an adult until age 26.
Well he's just barely an adult. In our brave new Obama world, you're not an adult until age 26.Wow 27 years old. Usually it's dumb kids doing dumb things.
People like you prove they don't need to exist.
White guy attacks white guy and gets 5 years.
White guy attacks black guy and gets 7 years. Both should get the same sentence.
and that it just so happens that 90%+ of the perps are black and 90%+ victims are white is conicidence? I am not defending what this guy did by any means. . . . just the double standard..
You really are ignorant. This is caused by the drug war which is the failure of big government and doesn't work. This is the institutional racism of big government. Try to educate yourself before you spout your BS.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/26/federal-authorities-charge-white-knockout-suspect-/
White guy knocks out and breaks jaw of elderly black man in texas. . . "just to see" if it would cause outrage. . . well apparently he's right! HATE CRIME!. I hope for his sake that he's really rich and suffers affluenza.
The problem isnt that this kid is getting charged with a hate crime. The problem is the blacks who attack whites arent.
This really goes to show the unbalanced idea that is "hate crimes".
Not a problem because intent has to be proved. This guy made the intent element easy to prove.
Its not called "Polar bear hunting" because they are actually hunting bears.
As I said. This kids charges are fitting. The problem isnt with his case, its all the other cases where the Feds turned a blind eye.
Did people scream "polar bear down" in the other cases? What do you have to satisfy that the victims were chosen based on race? This case it's fairly easy.
Charging someone with a hate crime means that you need to prove certain things. Your proof is just the races of the victims and attackers. That's not very substantial.
Ok, lets take a real world case rather than general statements.
How about that ball player in Oklahoma who was killed? One of the teens has tweeted racial slurs directed at whites. Funny, you dont see any federal charges there do you.
How about the couple that was attacked in New York, in which the group of minority attackers explicitly yelled racial slurs during the attack, and of which most were NOT charged with hate crimes? Explain to me how attacking someone of another race, shouting racial slurs and and yelling you are attacking them because of their race is not a hate crime?
Funny how the Feds sure do want to get involved when its a white guy making the attacks, but drag their feet when it snot. That is what I mean. The law isnt applied fairly in all cases.
Was it tweeted directly in reference to the crime?
Links?
It's strange you can claim that the government isn't acting fairly towards whites when our entire society and government is unfairly structured and developed to cater to white Americans. Why else has abuse of white privilege not been criminalized? It's a disgusting social ill.
I remember each of those cases on the local news here in SC... and there is no such thing as white privilege anymore. if you can't accomplish something its not because of your skin color.
Yes, it's around. White privilege is people "accomplishing" stuff that they didn't even earn because of their skin color. And they then say it's because "they worked hard."
Yes, it's around. White privilege is people "accomplishing" stuff that they didn't even earn because of their skin color. And they then say it's because "they worked hard."
I don't know what it's like where you are from, but everywhere I have lived that couldn't be further from the truth.
You come across as bitter and jealous.
so is it black privilege when a black person is promoted over a more qualified person of lets say Asian ethnicity, just so the company maintains its ratio? Or when a white kid is denied a scholarship but the EXACT same application is given a scholarship when African-american is checked? Same goes for male vs female.
Don't just work hard, be the best at what you do and if your current place passes you over b.c. of your race take your talent to a company with better morals.
How do you determine who is qualified? Don't you favor some factors over another? Do you not think white privilege plays into that?
All of American society and government needs to be reordered and redistributed and then we can go with the "don't just work hard, be the best at what you do" stuff.
by using annual performance reports that mask gender, race, and names.... pretty simple really.
Or the case of some firefighters a few years back where it was based on standardized test score but not enough African american's were promoted so they had to promote those with lower test scores (and no CBA to search for it now was a few years back).
Personally if i found out i was given a job over a more qualified person just b.c. of my race, or status i'd be pissed.... If i didnt earn it via my work I dont want it.
We can use the "..be the best.." now, yeah some have to work harder than others but life isn't fair and never will be. If a homeless kid from NC can get a full ride to Harvard the only thing stopping anyone else from doing the same is themselves. (just one quick example b4 i leave work).
This is often what happens with white privilege though
Any attack on an elderly person is despicable. The fact that this elderly man was targeted purely because of his race by a white jackass trying to make a political point makes it even more despicable.
It's a shame the victim wasn't carrying a firearm so that he could have blown that smug smile off this fucking idiots face.
The problem isnt that this kid is getting charged with a hate crime. The problem is the blacks who attack whites arent.
This really goes to show the unbalanced idea that is "hate crimes".
I think the issue is that Jim Crow laws were active up until about 1965. We're not really that far out from this period of time. There are still african american's alive who remember lynch mobs, segregation in every facet of society, discrimination in the justice system, and so these topics remain highly sensitive. If you really think about it, between 1863 and 1965, white society openly, blatantly used laws, the justice system, informal militias to intimidate black society. White society doesn't mean, just a few outliers and etc. No it means WHITE SOCIETY as in the majority of people either didn't care, were OK with it, or openly supported it. It wasn't until around the civil rights movement in the 50s and early 60s that things began to change. So I understand a bit the double standard. Again, not that far removed.The problem isnt that this kid is getting charged with a hate crime. The problem is the blacks who attack whites arent.
This really goes to show the unbalanced idea that is "hate crimes".