Right so the TSA added no value there
That's false reasoning. Absence of something doesn't mean it was prevented or discouraged. And it is well known that the TSA fails 90+% of the time so the statistical chance a terrorist makes it through is quite high. 9/11 style attacks can no longer happen because of aircraft changes and procedures (cockpit door hardening) Not because the TSA stops 10% of bombs and firearms going through their checkpoints
If you read the links I posted even a government study found private security to be more efficient and friendly.
And let's not forget things like the quiet skies program which had air Marshall's follow you if you looked at the gate, boarded late or slept on the plane:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...ero-threats/dsCm4BG3pq8v3xhi01zhLI/story.html
Or the secret watch list they put you on if your were rude to them or waited near security screening
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/politics/new-watch-list-tsa-screeners-.html
Or their unscientific, rascit profiling tactics:
https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-...w-documents-show-tsa-program-blamed-profiling
I could go on about and on but you feel safer despite the mountain of evidence they are ineffective so I guess that validates molestation, racism, search and seizures, etc etc that they bring (27,000 of the 55,000 agents have had complaints registered against them.)