- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,266
- 126
oh my god that has to be a setup. someone can't be that fucking stupid.
Uhh, no. That's not why the Union is in danger. It's in danger because some people think Jerry Springer, Pro Wrestling, and the caller in question are *real*...
Granted, the girl on welfare was a total idiot, but sadly, that does not elevate Micheal Savage in any way. And all it tells us is that Savage is slightly smarter than a total idiot.
Nor did the clip show anything about why Savage support's the Arizona law. A bone of contention that can be argued quite rationally either way. And since three entities have already filed suit against the Arizona law and the US Justice department will likely follow,
its no longer a subject for talk show hosts or politicians, as the courts will have the final word.
And its also possible that Savage faked the whole encounter, just for red raw meat for his devoted followers to eat right up.
No, I 100% endorse the HayaBausa Rider thread topic of, "And this is why the Union is in danger."
Yep its true folks, this nation is endangered because we have too many political talk radio show. And we get the dumbing down of America as a result. We used to get our news from newspapers where reporters by in large reported all sides of the story, pro and con. And even when we got an editorial opinion, it was labeled an opinion with the editorial writer being somewhat required to show why the pro's outweighed the con's.
Uhh, no. That's not why the Union is in danger. It's in danger because some people think Jerry Springer, Pro Wrestling, and the caller in question are *real*...
Haya, why were you listening to Michael Savage?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------That caller sounded obviously fake to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But as we all already know from the Rush Limbaugh show, if just ONE opponent of that Arizona law is wrong and makes false assumptions, every single other opponent of the Arizona law is equally wrong, equally illogical, and we can safely conclude the Arizona Law is so totally constitutional.
I don't. I found the link in another forum . . .
It is either dishonestly staged or a cherry-picked anecdotal extreme which proves NO legitimate point beyond its own sad existence, unless you are desperately predisposed to want it to.