You are the one trying to trivialize turning neighbors in to the authorities, know full well that some type of punishment will be forthcoming. Just like swatting, just a matter of degree.
You are the one trying to trivialize turning neighbors in to the authorities, know full well that some type of punishment will be forthcoming. Just like swatting, just a matter of degree.Unfortunately, this is typical MAGA these days. Tens of millions of sociopaths that just don't think right and decent.
You are the one trying to trivialize turning neighbors in to the authorities, know full well that some type of punishment will be forthcoming. Just like swatting, just a matter of degree.
You are the one trying to trivialize turning neighbors in to the authorities, know full well that some type of punishment will be forthcoming. Just like swatting, just a matter of degree.
When your neighbors are putting your family in danger by being selfish pricks, yeah, report them. They'll get a fine, and not sent to a fucking concentration camp, you collosal shithead.
Did you ask your neighbors if they already had COVID?
Did you ask them if they were all participants in a study and administered a vaccine?
Nah, call the cops for not being pure enough.
Again do you not see a difference in turning in your neighbor for being Jewish when you know they will be enslaved and murdered. And turning in your neighbor for choosing to break the law, which could get other people killed, and at most he'll face a ticket equivalent to speeding?You are the one trying to trivialize turning neighbors in to the authorities, know full well that some type of punishment will be forthcoming. Just like swatting, just a matter of degree.
No, i find them both to be evil. You find one to be not only acceptable, but a civic duty.Again do you not see a difference in turning in your neighbor for being Jewish when you know they will be enslaved and murdered. And turning in your neighbor for choosing to break the law, which could get other people killed, and at most he'll face a ticket equivalent to speeding?
Differences for you: Choice, Potential to harm others, Death penalty vs risk of ticket.
No, i find them both to be evil. You find one to be not only acceptable, but a civic duty.
No, i find them both to be evil. You find one to be not only acceptable, but a civic duty.
Did you ask your neighbors if they already had COVID?
Did you ask them if they were all participants in a study and administered a vaccine?
Nah, call the cops for not being pure enough.
Posting in the ATP&N over too many years.You are out of your tiny mind. How did you get like that?
Yeah, because everyone that spreads COVID knows they have it! Holy shit you are a dumb motherfucker.Did you ask your neighbors if they already had COVID?
Did you ask them if they were all participants in a study and administered a vaccine?
Nah, call the cops for not being pure enough.
Holy shit, you are a fucking Nazi. You are seriously a sick person. Get some help.No, i find them both to be evil. You find one to be not only acceptable, but a civic duty.
Evil is equating one with the other flippantly. As you did. To even mention them in the same breath, repeatedly, is simply obscene.
Pretty obvious he is a white supremacist or at least plays one on here.He took it a step further - comparing 'people strongly disagreeing with me on a forum' with 'being lynched'. Thus trivalising 20th century terrorist murders of black Americans in addition to treating lightly the genocide of Jewish people. I just don't get the mentality behind it. Is it a deep - yet mysteriously-factually-ungrounded - sense of victimhood, or is it that he genuinely doesn't see anything very terrible about murdering people based on their race?
He took it a step further - comparing 'people strongly disagreeing with me on a forum' with 'being lynched'. Thus trivalising 20th century terrorist murders of black Americans in addition to treating lightly the genocide of Jewish people. I just don't get the mentality behind it. Is it a deep - yet mysteriously-factually-ungrounded - sense of victimhood, or is it that he genuinely doesn't see anything very terrible about murdering people based on their race?
Did they spray paint it, burn it, damage it with metal objects and wreck the statue and throw it in a nearby river/lake?
Oh NO! Not a taped piece of paper! How will they manage to fix this defacement?
Posting in the ATP&N over too many years.
Your ignorance is not bliss. Lynching is not a one way road with only a single target.
Many whites were lynched for fighting racism
Racism is not dead in America, but the fact remains that many whites have died trying to defeat it, an Alabama Sate professor says.www.montgomeryadvertiser.com
.................................
"The Negro Holocaust: Lynching and Race Riots in the United States, 1880-1950" states that, contrary to present-day popular conception, lynching was not a crime committed exclusively against black people. Between the 1830s and the 1850s the majority of those lynched in the United States were whites. From 1882-1968, some 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States (not all lynchings were recorded). Of these, 3,446 or 73 percent were black and 1,297 (27 percent) were white. In other words, whites were the victims of more than one-fourth of all lynchings in the United States.
The vast majority (79 percent) of lynchings occurred in the South. Mississippi had the highest number of lynchings from 1882-1968 with 581, Georgia was second with 531, and Texas was third with 493. For blacks, most of the lynchings occurred in the South. Of the lynchings that did not take place in the South, most occurred in the West, and these were often lynchings of whites, not blacks. Note that for whites, it was equally likely that they would be lynched in Colorado (65) as Kentucky (63), Mississippi (42) as California (41), or Oregon (20) as West Virginia (20). Ninety percent of whites were lynched in nine states mostly in a swath from Montana, to Nebraska, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Texas. Ninety percent of blacks were lynched in the four Southern states of Mississippi, Georgia, Texas and Louisiana. Whites and blacks were lynched in “relatively equal” numbers in New York, New Jersey, Minnesota, Illinois and Missouri.
The worst year for whites was 1884 when 160 whites were lynched. For blacks, the highest number of lynchings occurred in 1892 when 161 were lynched. Three-fourths of all white lynchings occurred in the 14-year span from1882-1895. It took 28 years (1882-1909) for three-fourths of all black lynchings. There seems to have been a relative decline in lynchings generally beginning in 1901.
Not all states lynched people. Alaska, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Connecticut had no reported lynchings between 1882-1968. Even among those states that did have lynchings, seven states did not lynch any blacks: Arizona, Idaho, Maine, Nevada, South Dakota, Vermont and Wisconsin. Delaware is the only state in which a black person was lynched and no whites were lynched. Of the 44 states in which lynchings occurred, 23 (52 percent) states lynched more white people than black.
While some whites were lynched for murder or stealing cattle, there is another important reason many were lynched. Many whites were lynched for helping blacks or being anti-lynching. According to David Barton’s extensively well-documented book, "Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black & White," the original targets of the Ku Klux Klan were Republicans, both black and white. The Klan terrorized both black and white Americans not to vote for Republican tickets. “Of all forms of violent intimidation, lynchings were by far the most effective.” Republicans often led the efforts to pass federal anti-lynching laws and their platforms consistently called for a ban on lynching. “Democrats successfully blocked those bills and their platforms never did condemn lynchings.”
So there it is, the inconvenient truth. The truth that more than 1,000 whites were lynched and many of them were lynched because they were Republican, because they supported their fellow black citizens and because they opposed the lawless act of lynching. Equal rights, political autonomy, personal freedom … these are fundamental principles of our democracy. But they have not always been so. More than 360,000 whites fought and died in the (un)Civil War to help defeat slavery. And many whites were lynched because they believed that these principles also belong to black Americans. Racism is not dead in America, but the fact remains that many whites have died trying to defeat it.
Yes you did pmv, you made the claim, i just used a link to refute what you claimed. Your ignorance was not bliss.
The lynch mob mentality is aimed at the fact that they don't even know who committed the crime, but you and a few other people have your ropes out and are screaming for blood.You refuted nothing. You wear your ignorance like a suit of armour. No information can ever pierce it.
You're a fascist-enabling piece of fucking garbage who has literally called for killing illegal immigrants.The lynch mob mentality is aimed at the fact that they don't even know who committed the crime, but you and a few other people have your ropes out and are screaming for blood.
They are right-wing authoritarian fascist enablers. They want their chosen rightful authority figure to punish everyone that doesn't belong to their in-group.What type of person trolls in a topic like this? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with these folks?