He is pretty flippant about killing the Jews too, equating their enslavement or murder to that to what would be a possible citation and fee for violating health guidelines during a pandemic. I wonder how he feels about Muslims and the blacks.
You're a fascist-enabling piece of fucking garbage who has literally called for killing illegal immigrants.
You're fucking garbage.
Posting in the ATP&N over too many years.
The kind that make me weep for my fellow man. But on a serious note I have no idea if they are that deranged, a sociopath or a nazi (maybe all of the above). This thread should have included universal condemnation for these heinous acts, not whataboutisms and whatever else. I knew some posters here were not worth entertaining in conversation but I had no idea they were this far gone.What type of person trolls in a topic like this? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with these folks?
Shitbag Fascist imported_tajmahal isn't just for using grenades to kill people. He's also in favor of shooting people. Don't pigeonhole the fascist piece of garbage.Hey baby killer....how much do you practice throwing grenades? Use pictures of infants as your practice targets, right? Would fit for you.
Seems to me like you did. You basically said it's not so bad because someone can clean it up.No. No I didn't. But nice job crafting your own arguments into your head that simply don't exist.
You do realize that you can't claim to be from the party of Lincoln and downplay Nazi atrocities and defend the Confederate flag/statues as heritage all at the same time, right?Your ignorance is not bliss. Lynching is not a one way road with only a single target.
Many whites were lynched for fighting racism
Racism is not dead in America, but the fact remains that many whites have died trying to defeat it, an Alabama Sate professor says.www.montgomeryadvertiser.com
.................................
"The Negro Holocaust: Lynching and Race Riots in the United States, 1880-1950" states that, contrary to present-day popular conception, lynching was not a crime committed exclusively against black people. Between the 1830s and the 1850s the majority of those lynched in the United States were whites. From 1882-1968, some 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States (not all lynchings were recorded). Of these, 3,446 or 73 percent were black and 1,297 (27 percent) were white. In other words, whites were the victims of more than one-fourth of all lynchings in the United States.
The vast majority (79 percent) of lynchings occurred in the South. Mississippi had the highest number of lynchings from 1882-1968 with 581, Georgia was second with 531, and Texas was third with 493. For blacks, most of the lynchings occurred in the South. Of the lynchings that did not take place in the South, most occurred in the West, and these were often lynchings of whites, not blacks. Note that for whites, it was equally likely that they would be lynched in Colorado (65) as Kentucky (63), Mississippi (42) as California (41), or Oregon (20) as West Virginia (20). Ninety percent of whites were lynched in nine states mostly in a swath from Montana, to Nebraska, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Texas. Ninety percent of blacks were lynched in the four Southern states of Mississippi, Georgia, Texas and Louisiana. Whites and blacks were lynched in “relatively equal” numbers in New York, New Jersey, Minnesota, Illinois and Missouri.
The worst year for whites was 1884 when 160 whites were lynched. For blacks, the highest number of lynchings occurred in 1892 when 161 were lynched. Three-fourths of all white lynchings occurred in the 14-year span from1882-1895. It took 28 years (1882-1909) for three-fourths of all black lynchings. There seems to have been a relative decline in lynchings generally beginning in 1901.
Not all states lynched people. Alaska, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Connecticut had no reported lynchings between 1882-1968. Even among those states that did have lynchings, seven states did not lynch any blacks: Arizona, Idaho, Maine, Nevada, South Dakota, Vermont and Wisconsin. Delaware is the only state in which a black person was lynched and no whites were lynched. Of the 44 states in which lynchings occurred, 23 (52 percent) states lynched more white people than black.
While some whites were lynched for murder or stealing cattle, there is another important reason many were lynched. Many whites were lynched for helping blacks or being anti-lynching. According to David Barton’s extensively well-documented book, "Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black & White," the original targets of the Ku Klux Klan were Republicans, both black and white. The Klan terrorized both black and white Americans not to vote for Republican tickets. “Of all forms of violent intimidation, lynchings were by far the most effective.” Republicans often led the efforts to pass federal anti-lynching laws and their platforms consistently called for a ban on lynching. “Democrats successfully blocked those bills and their platforms never did condemn lynchings.”
So there it is, the inconvenient truth. The truth that more than 1,000 whites were lynched and many of them were lynched because they were Republican, because they supported their fellow black citizens and because they opposed the lawless act of lynching. Equal rights, political autonomy, personal freedom … these are fundamental principles of our democracy. But they have not always been so. More than 360,000 whites fought and died in the (un)Civil War to help defeat slavery. And many whites were lynched because they believed that these principles also belong to black Americans. Racism is not dead in America, but the fact remains that many whites have died trying to defeat it.
Your ignorance is not bliss. Lynching is not a one way road with only a single target.
Many whites were lynched for fighting racism
Racism is not dead in America, but the fact remains that many whites have died trying to defeat it, an Alabama Sate professor says.www.montgomeryadvertiser.com
.................................
"The Negro Holocaust: Lynching and Race Riots in the United States, 1880-1950" states that, contrary to present-day popular conception, lynching was not a crime committed exclusively against black people. Between the 1830s and the 1850s the majority of those lynched in the United States were whites. From 1882-1968, some 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States (not all lynchings were recorded). Of these, 3,446 or 73 percent were black and 1,297 (27 percent) were white. In other words, whites were the victims of more than one-fourth of all lynchings in the United States.
The vast majority (79 percent) of lynchings occurred in the South. Mississippi had the highest number of lynchings from 1882-1968 with 581, Georgia was second with 531, and Texas was third with 493. For blacks, most of the lynchings occurred in the South. Of the lynchings that did not take place in the South, most occurred in the West, and these were often lynchings of whites, not blacks. Note that for whites, it was equally likely that they would be lynched in Colorado (65) as Kentucky (63), Mississippi (42) as California (41), or Oregon (20) as West Virginia (20). Ninety percent of whites were lynched in nine states mostly in a swath from Montana, to Nebraska, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Texas. Ninety percent of blacks were lynched in the four Southern states of Mississippi, Georgia, Texas and Louisiana. Whites and blacks were lynched in “relatively equal” numbers in New York, New Jersey, Minnesota, Illinois and Missouri.
The worst year for whites was 1884 when 160 whites were lynched. For blacks, the highest number of lynchings occurred in 1892 when 161 were lynched. Three-fourths of all white lynchings occurred in the 14-year span from1882-1895. It took 28 years (1882-1909) for three-fourths of all black lynchings. There seems to have been a relative decline in lynchings generally beginning in 1901.
Not all states lynched people. Alaska, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Connecticut had no reported lynchings between 1882-1968. Even among those states that did have lynchings, seven states did not lynch any blacks: Arizona, Idaho, Maine, Nevada, South Dakota, Vermont and Wisconsin. Delaware is the only state in which a black person was lynched and no whites were lynched. Of the 44 states in which lynchings occurred, 23 (52 percent) states lynched more white people than black.
While some whites were lynched for murder or stealing cattle, there is another important reason many were lynched. Many whites were lynched for helping blacks or being anti-lynching. According to David Barton’s extensively well-documented book, "Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black & White," the original targets of the Ku Klux Klan were Republicans, both black and white. The Klan terrorized both black and white Americans not to vote for Republican tickets. “Of all forms of violent intimidation, lynchings were by far the most effective.” Republicans often led the efforts to pass federal anti-lynching laws and their platforms consistently called for a ban on lynching. “Democrats successfully blocked those bills and their platforms never did condemn lynchings.”
So there it is, the inconvenient truth. The truth that more than 1,000 whites were lynched and many of them were lynched because they were Republican, because they supported their fellow black citizens and because they opposed the lawless act of lynching. Equal rights, political autonomy, personal freedom … these are fundamental principles of our democracy. But they have not always been so. More than 360,000 whites fought and died in the (un)Civil War to help defeat slavery. And many whites were lynched because they believed that these principles also belong to black Americans. Racism is not dead in America, but the fact remains that many whites have died trying to defeat it.
We only do that to statues of traitors. So that their traitor offspring remember what they are.Did they spray paint it, burn it, damage it with metal objects and wreck the statue and throw it in a nearby river/lake?
First of all, it was a lie. Very likely one person did it impersonating the "we" of "we are everywhere." One solitary lonely hateful person (who happens to be hiding!). They are everywhere (well, not everywhere, but here and there), but the fact is they are extremely outnumbered... fortunately.
problem is the rwnj like taj have no problem doing it all the time and don't seem to realize the republicans in the mid 1800s were the progressives.You do realize that you can't claim to be from the party of Lincoln and downplay Nazi atrocities and defend the Confederate flag/statues as heritage all at the same time, right?
What type of person trolls in a topic like this? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with these folks?
It has been occurring for years now but it's only gotten worse the past couple months with the election happening. At some point they should be banned.What type of person trolls in a topic like this? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with these folks?
I'd be much happier if they were more SILENT.why, the "silent majority" of course!
I'm fairly confident that he's well aware of the fact that the Lincoln Republicans were liberals.problem is the rwnj like taj have no problem doing it all the time and don't seem to realize the republicans in the mid 1800s were the progressives.
‘This celebration of anti-Semitic genocide is easy to clean off’ is not the slam dunk argument he appears to think it is.No, they put swastikas on it, you fucking shitstain.
I clicked on this thread, knowing full well there would not be universal condemnation of the act. I knew, because the spineless, gutless, wanna be Nazis, like the real ones my father killed, post here.What type of person trolls in a topic like this? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with these folks?
We only do that to statues of traitors. So that their traitor offspring remember what they are.
It's shocking to me that condemning nazis is not universally accepted and that doing so will get you ironically labeled as "woke" or SJW. Which brings me to my next question, why do RWNJ think the label "social justice warrior" is offensive in anyway?I clicked on this thread, knowing full well there would not be universal condemnation of the act. I knew, because the spineless, gutless, wanna be Nazis, like the real ones my father killed, post here.
Gee, I wonder if the objection was to traitors generally or to traitors to the country in which the statues reside. Durrrrrr.Thomson Jefferson and George Washington were traitors?
I think you might need to re-take some 4th grade history lessons little Billy.
Um, yes?Thomson Jefferson and George Washington were traitors?
It's shocking to me that condemning nazis is not universally accepted and that doing so will get you ironically labeled as "woke" or SJW. Which brings me to my next question, why do RWNJ think the label "social justice warrior" is offensive in anyway?
Thomson Jefferson and George Washington were traitors?
I think you might need to re-take some 4th grade history lessons little Billy.
Trump is the dark room; brings the roaches out. Stick around when the lights come on, and they WILL get squashed again.It's shocking to me that condemning nazis is not universally accepted and that doing so will get you ironically labeled as "woke" or SJW. Which brings me to my next question, why do RWNJ think the label "social justice warrior" is offensive in anyway?